Jump to content

Sweden faces political deadlock after far-right gains


webfact

Recommended Posts

 

It is reported in the Swedish MSM dn.se that the reason why Ms Loof, C, called off the

negotiations with Mr Lofven, S, was disagreement re workers rights.

 

In the situation when a company / enterprise has to take steps to lay off people,

who should go first/last, they could not agree upon.

 

Important issue for employees of course,

but crucial for building a government?

 

Not uncommon in large scale negotiations, they fail on relatively minor issues.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 287
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Appreciate your updates melvinmelvin. I have kind of given up on this. 3 months down the road and no government. Just proves that Swedish politicians, like all others, are narcissistic megalomaniacs... No surprises there. But what is worst, they seriously believe that by totally neglecting SD they will win their own and SD will magically go away. 18% of voters, and growing...

Look at the rest of Europe...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, SpaceKadet said:

Appreciate your updates melvinmelvin. I have kind of given up on this. 3 months down the road and no government. Just proves that Swedish politicians, like all others, are narcissistic megalomaniacs... No surprises there. But what is worst, they seriously believe that by totally neglecting SD they will win their own and SD will magically go away. 18% of voters, and growing...

Look at the rest of Europe...  

Thank you.

 

Agree, turning the blind eye to SD will not really solve anything, and in all likelihood,

it will just strengthen SDs voter base.

 

If this had been the situation where I come from, Norway, my honest guess is that the government issue

would have been sorted long time ago.

Why? Experience. Our politicians have years of experience in building governments across blue/red blocks/borders

they can quickly get down to the essence and start talk practical politics and what goes / does not go.

This situation is kinda new in Sweden, hence, meagre results so far.

 

We also have a much less stringent and easier process for picking a PM if the GE does not give a clear answer.  

 

Anyway,

I am somewhat surprised that the Speaker does not take a more active role in this.

It is clear that these politicians need quality guidance and need to be told where the cupboard should be placed

and where Adam bought his beer.

The new Speaker is a very experienced politician and well respected and should be able to offer guidance.

However, I am not familiar with Swedish parliamentarian practice, for all I know an active Speaker is not

proper, perhaps.

 

But it is rather obvious that these politicians are in need of guidance and assistance.

The way I see it, the Speaker, number 2 man in the country, should be able to offer that.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, you are right. Th Speaker is very experienced and respected politician, but this is a first.  I suppose he doesn't want to be the first ever in Swedish politics to fail to create a working government. Never before is Swedish politics had they contend something they don't understand. You could just follow the pre-election  debates to see how far removed from the electorate the parties were.

It would seem that the other European countries are much more mature in their politics and can embrace and co-work with parties that represent a sizable portion of the electorate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, roobaa01 said:

last but least the 3 rd attempt to form a gov failed for swedish people are sick of cartel party deals with left wing moral hyper sickness. new elections then the sd will rise to 20 plus, 5555

 

wbr

roobaa01

fair enough,

but as far as the Speaker is concerned, it was his 2nd attempt, he still has 2 of his 4 attempts left.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, melvinmelvin said:

fair enough,

but as far as the Speaker is concerned, it was his 2nd attempt, he still has 2 of his 4 attempts left.

 

no problem, so the game could be called swedish roulette instead of the russian one. i wonder no left wing tootsy came out thus far to raise russian influence.

 

mfg

roobaa01

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday evening on a TV program the Speaker opined;

 

That he was disappointed that the party leaders were still pretty far apart and locked

in pre election positions.

He said that during the weekend he had been in contact with all the party leaders

and that he early this week will inform the public about the next steps to be taken.

He said that he hoped that the next candidate would be a candidate that had a real chance of flying.

 

 

I find his last comment a bit strange. If I have understood the process correctly, the Speaker is the

sole decision maker re candidates to be put forward.

 

Maybe it is not supposed to be that way in Sweden, but I had expected the Speaker to take a more active

role in banging heads. It is rather clear that the politicians need assistance/facilitation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today, Wednesday 19th, the Speaker announced

that the next PM vote will take place on 16th January 2019.

 

So far, no identified candidate. The process between now and mid January in order to destill

a candidate is not clear to me.

 

------

 

Ms Loof and the Centre party is going significantly down down down in the polls

after they did not manage to pull it off with Mr Lofven and the S party.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, melvinmelvin said:

Today, Wednesday 19th, the Speaker announced

that the next PM vote will take place on 16th January 2019.

 

So far, no identified candidate. The process between now and mid January in order to destill

a candidate is not clear to me.

 

------

 

Ms Loof and the Centre party is going significantly down down down in the polls

after they did not manage to pull it off with Mr Lofven and the S party.

 

 

 

yep and sd up, up......

 

wbr

roobaa01

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, roobaa01 said:

yep and sd up, up......

 

wbr

roobaa01

I guess by sd you mean Social Democrats. Because they did go up on the latest Ipsos poll by 4 points. As for the Sweden Democrats, the news isn't so good. Down by 2 points.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-19/swedish-christian-democrats-overtake-center-in-latest-ipsos-poll

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bristolboy said:

I guess by sd you mean Social Democrats. Because they did go up on the latest Ipsos poll by 4 points. As for the Sweden Democrats, the news isn't so good. Down by 2 points.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-19/swedish-christian-democrats-overtake-center-in-latest-ipsos-poll

What I think this poll is saying is that the

voters are not happy that the recent PM vote failed.

 

And it seems they put the blame on the Centre party and the Liberal party.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

From Bloomberg above and dn.se and svd.se today,

 

the National Assembly will soon enter a 3 week Xmas/new year break.

 

The Speaker will meet with party leaders on the 14th of January and there will be a PM vote on the 16th.

If that vote does not produce a PM there will be another PM vote on 23rd  of January.

(that is assuming that the Speaker can find a willing candidate)

 

Next step will be an extraordinary GE.

 

The Speaker called on Mr Kristersson, M and Mr Lofven, S to show responsibility for pushing the process forward.

Which in practical terms means that either potential PM would need the support of Ms Loof and the Centre party.

 

Unless some new constellations should surface over Xmas.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

According to dn.se  the Speaker has had conversations with both

Mr Kristersson, leader of M, and Mr Lofven, leader of S, to assess how their

efforts re building s government is progressing.

 

apparently no xmas quiet for the two

 

nothing leaks from these talks, impressive - all involved are mum

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday the Speaker had individual talks with the leaders of the two largest parties in Sweden.

Mr Lofven, S and Mr Kristersson, M. The purpose of the talks; update the Speaker on progress re

building a government that the assembly can tolerate and without the need for SD support.

 

As usual, nothing leaks from these talks but I think it is safe to assume that they both endeavour

to lure the liberal parties, C and L, into supporting them.

 

They have about another week to sort it out.

 

------

I wonder. Hope there is a Swede or two around.

In everything I have heard from the Speaker he is totally clear on the dates for voting,

not once, as far as I have heard, has he mentioned the possibility of not having a PM candidate.

 

Can the Speaker simply decide that a party leader shall be a PM candidate and then carry out the voting process?

Find it somewhat strange that the no-candidate situation never has been mentioned.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Thursday morning this week the Speaker will meet (individually) with

the two (currently) potential PM candidates,

Mr Lofven, S, and Mr Kristersson, M.

 

Following their reports and the talks

the Speaker will be briefed in detail re conditions related to an extraordinary general election.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today

the Speaker has had individual meetings with the leaders of the two largest parties in Sweden.

The leaders conveying their final report of their efforts to the Speaker.

 

The Speaker, only says;

Monday next week I will meet with all party leaders, following that a PM candidate will be nominated

and the vote will take place on Wednesday next week.

 

(the way the Speaker expresses himself and the language used in Swedish msm suggests to me that relevant people 

 cannot actually refuse to become a PM candidate, not sure if that is correct though)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has been reported in Swedish msm that for all practical purposes the negotiations

between the parties re building a functional majority coalition must be finalised

before tomorrow morning.

 

Saturday and Sunday the MP groups and the decision making bodies with the C and L parties

will meet and see if they can accept what has been negotiated.

 

Monday morning the Speaker has scheduled meetings will the party leaders

following which he will launch a PM candidate to be voted over on Wednesday next week.

 

The Speaker now has 2 attempts left to find a PM candidate that survives the voting process,

of these two attempts both fail the constitution stipulates a new general election.

The date 7th April has been picked for such, if necessary.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, melvinmelvin said:

It has been reported in Swedish msm that for all practical purposes the negotiations

between the parties re building a functional majority coalition must be finalised

before tomorrow morning.

 

Saturday and Sunday the MP groups and the decision making bodies with the C and L parties

will meet and see if they can accept what has been negotiated.

 

Monday morning the Speaker has scheduled meetings will the party leaders

following which he will launch a PM candidate to be voted over on Wednesday next week.

 

The Speaker now has 2 attempts left to find a PM candidate that survives the voting process,

of these two attempts both fail the constitution stipulates a new general election.

The date 7th April has been picked for such, if necessary.

 

Thanks again for the continued updates Melvin.

 

They are much appreciated even though very few comment on the thread as we know nothing about the Swedish political system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, dick dasterdly said:

Thanks again for the continued updates Melvin.

 

They are much appreciated even though very few comment on the thread as we know nothing about the Swedish political system.

alas, too many typos in my previous post, too late to edit now

 

my pleasure DD,

didn't know much myself either before I started to follow this process,

caught my interest to see how they manage to sort a functional majority government

not dependent on support from the populist, SD, party

 

I just happen to be pretty good at reading and listening to Swedish, so it is

easy for me to follow their MSM, some of the MSM are actually quite good

 

It is quite clear, to me - I think, that Swedish politicians have much much less experience

in building cross blue-red coalitions than Norwegian politicians,

Norwegian politicians are in my view pretty good at such and can normally conclude

within a reasonable timeframe,

they have of course plenty plenty experience in this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, melvinmelvin said:

 

The Speaker now has 2 attempts left to find a PM candidate that survives the voting process,

of these two attempts both fail the constitution stipulates a new general election.

The date 7th April has been picked for such, if necessary.

The Swedes don't like to hurry things. That's 7 months since the last elections were hold. 

 

Here is a story about the snap elections in English.

 

https://www.thelocal.se/20190111/swedish-snap-election-could-be-held-on-april-7th?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=thelocaleurope

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, oilinki said:

The Swedes don't like to hurry things. That's 7 months since the last elections were hold. 

 

Here is a story about the snap elections in English.

 

https://www.thelocal.se/20190111/swedish-snap-election-could-be-held-on-april-7th?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=thelocaleurope

 

 

ta,

good stuff

 

as far as I understand you cannot refuse to become a PM candidate in Sweden,

the possibility of not having a PM candidate has NEVER been mentioned

 

(in Norway, you cannot refuse to become a MP, at least it used to be that way,

 but becoming a PM is a kinda private deal between the relevant person and the Head of State)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, at last,

it seems that the PM hunting galore has been finalised.

 

Mr Lofven, S-Socialdemocrats as PM

backed by C-Centre and L-Liberal and MP-Green.

This represents a solid majority government.

 

C concluded last Friday evening L concluded yesterday afternoon.

 

This is what will be presented to the Speaker Monday morning and voted over on Wednesday.

 

Something really extraordinary would have to happen in order to derail this,

but you should never say never in politics.

 

The SD-Sweden Democrats seem

to be safely outmanoeuvred and sidelined,

this was very important for both S and C.

 

The two conservative parties, M and KD, are now in a clear minority.

 

Not sure what has happened to the red V (Left) party in this game, long since I have even

heard it mentioned.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Further to my post above.

Political happiness in Sweden is rather moderate I think you could say.

Some comments heard;

 

earlier V politician and MP says V has been treated unfairly in this process

 

the Swedendemocrats are of course disappointed that they have been sidelined,

but the degree of surprise ought to be moderate, it was not unexpected

 

MP/Green, not sure, but probably comfortable with the result

 

Mr Lofven, S, has received quite some criticism with the party,

this for giving up too much S principles in order to lure C and L into support.

It has been argued that it would have been better to let the PM post fly and keep the S principles.

 

C and L are fairly pleased is my guess, C more so than L, but .....

 

Ms Loof, the leader of C has received quite some praise within the party for the results of the process.

 

The two conservative parties, M and KD are quite simply VERY ANGRY.

They take their aggression out on Ms Loof. Words like traitor and Nazi are frequently heard.

 

Over the past 2-3 months, Ms Loof has quickly become the most hated politician in Sweden.

Social media are full of very very harsh criticism directed at her.

Four letter words and threats are flying all over the place.

Wouldn't surprise me if the security police is watching her.

 

 

Couple of days ago, Dagens Nyheter (dn.se), I think the largest newspaper in Sweden,

had a very lengthy editorial about the process and in particular the roles of the C party and Ms Loof,

the editors of DN praised her and her doings in this process.

so; some hate - some praise, can't win 'em all

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Further to the above,

as I said, never say never in politics

 

"civil war" has just broken out within the L party, the body of the upper political echelons

are debating the issue right now,

 

broad casted live, here https://www.dn.se/nyheter/politik/live-liberalernas-partirad/

in Swedish of course.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see now that my post above summing up majority / minority is incorrect to say the least,

sorry,

will have a go at doing better in a post below

 

just a few observations first;

 

the large labour unions in Sweden are not really happy with the coalition Mr Lofven is building,

the call it toothless

and too far to the right

 

The upper echelons (the manifesto bosses) in the Liberal party have now concluded,

they are split but the majority concluded to support Mr Lofven, S as PM.

looks to me from what I read that they make decision dependent on the leftmost

party, V, also joining (will have a go at explaining why below)

 

In the MP party (the green party) the organisation for the young members are starting

to make a fuss, they do not think it is appropriate that MP joins such a coalition.

 

"civil unrest" to some extent in V, they are still debating whether to join and

support Mr Lofven's efforts, without V's support Mr Lofven's prospect would look bleak.

 

it is worth remembering that it is today that the Speaker will meet with all party

leaders and establish a candidate to be voted on, (can be delayed I would guess).

It is now 3 am in Sweden - so they still have some hours to get this sorted.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry for my sloppiness above - will have a go at explaining seats and groups in a better way here

 

Sweden has 349 seats in its national assembly. Computed majority is 175.

In order to pass the PM/government voting process you must ensure that

less than the computed majority vote against you, (yes/support - votes do not count).

 

seat overview:

 

left, V (red) - 28 seats / MP (green) - 16 seats

S (red) - 100 seats / C (blue) -31 seats / L (blue) - 20 seats

M (blue) - 70 seats / KD (blue) - 22 seats / SD (blue/brown?) 62 seats

 

Now, it is reasonable to expect that SD, KD and M will vote reject to Mr Lofven as PM,

that is a group of 70+22+62=154 votes/seats - 21 votes short of computed majority

 

Mr Lofven's current coalition is

S+C+L+MP with 100+31+20+16=167 seats, 8 seats short of computed majority

 

If V with its 28 seats should conclude to support Mr Lofven the coalition would command

votes way above computed majority.

It is worth noting that that will be the case even if MP (green) should pull out of the coalition.

And, furthermore it is worth noting that MP's 16 seats will not suffice re bringing the conservative

group passed computed majority.

 

(can only hope, that this was at least a wee bit better)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now,

the Swedish Speaker is conducting his series of individual meetings with all party leaders,

before pointing to a PM candidate.

Mr Lofven has concluded his meeting and is now holding a press conference,

he looks very very tired, has probably been working 24 hours since before Xmas.

 

broadcasted live on dn.se the meetings with the Speaker are mum, but the press conferences are broadcasted

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, melvinmelvin said:

Right now,

the Swedish Speaker is conducting his series of individual meetings with all party leaders,

before pointing to a PM candidate.

Mr Lofven has concluded his meeting and is now holding a press conference,

he looks very very tired, has probably been working 24 hours since before Xmas.

 

broadcasted live on dn.se the meetings with the Speaker are mum, but the press conferences are broadcasted

 

 

 

I was quite impressed with that press conference,

first the way in which he reported to the press and secondly the way in

he responded to questions.

Very very clear concise and to the point, and not least open and friendly.

 

Both UK and Norway could do with PMs with comparable qualities.

 

It seems clear now that the open question here is the leftwing V party,

will they support the social/centre coalition or vote it down?

This seems to be open, so far.

 

Will see what the Speaker comes up with this (Swedish) afternoon.

 

( my guess;

 if V should vote down Mr Lofven's coalition this will lead to a new election.

 can't see any meaning in a leftwing party propping up a government of KD, M and SD

 alternatively

 if this week's vote goes down the drain the Speaker allows ample time for trying to

 negotiate V into the coalition.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...