Jump to content

Health insurance mandatory for long-stay foreigners in Thailand


Recommended Posts

Posted

I think it is a good idea as I am sure the Embassies in Bangkok are getting tried about being called about a foreigner who has no health coverage. I have seen this many times before where many expats dont even so much as have accident insurance. Yes you think it will not happen to you until is does. Private health care in Thailand can be pretty stiff and there should have been a rule years ago about health insurance as well as death coverage to ensure that there is money to send you body back home if that is what you want. The annual premiums above is pretty standard in Thailand but they usually offer combination policies such as coverage for cancer and other illnesses, accidents as well as death. 

  • Sad 2
Posted
22 minutes ago, jesimps said:

Fpr the attention of Ubon Joe. Grateful to know your take on this. Have 103FM got it wrong? They state all retirement type visas and extensions.

Not believing 103fm since other reports differ

  • Like 1
Posted

Clear as mud as usual, will this apply to all visa types, including PE (elite) when over 50 or just O-A and retirement extension or all extensions or to any one the IO of the day decides it should apply to. Can't they just shoot the PR people and replace them with one myanmar maid.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Can we only use Thai companies if they are part of the scam sorry I mean scheme? 40,000 for out patients? Are they serious? Is this just extension non o and a, or is it the normal multi entry visas?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, asiaexpat said:

Not believing 103fm since other reports differ

Well last time they was correct, so my opinion is they are absolutely trustworthy, speciel with the laws down here about fake news

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mosha said:

Can we only use Thai companies if they are part of the scam sorry I mean scheme? 40,000 for out patients? Are they serious? Is this just extension non o and a, or is it the normal multi entry visas?

 

I would assume as much as the local hospitals dont get a fit when you have a Thai medical aid card.

Posted

What about me that are paying Thai SSO and have a foreign in hospital policy with a cover of $2,5 mil.

What about those foreigners married to government workers. They are given free medical because all immediate family is covered 100% for any inpatient and outpatient medical problems as long as they use government hospitals. How will this new law affect them? 
 


Sent from my SM-A730F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Posted

Been expecting this.  I have in stay hospitalization coverage but no outpatient.   If I don’t need hospitalization I can fly back  to the US if it requires tens of thousands in outpatient care.   Hope they take that into consideration because I don’t want or need  outpatient care coverage.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Jumbo1968 said:

If you live out the UK for more than 6 months in one year you lose the entitlement to free medical treatment although they don’t ever refuse emergency treatment irrespective if you own property.

Although you are liable for UK Tax if you own a property in the UK ?

That's not quite true - you are not entitled to free NHS care in the UK if you are not 'ordinarily resident.' Someone who has been out of the UK for less than 6 months is almost always still considered as ordinarily resident but in contrast, just because you've been away for more than 6 months does not mean you have automatically lost your ordinarily resident status.

 

Just ask anyone (and there have been numerous cases) who has been forced to pay taxes because they were still considered to be ordinarily resident despite spending more than 6 months abroad. There was the famous example of an airline pilot (John Robson Gibson) who over a period of years spent as little as 60 days a year in the UK but was still found to be ordinarily resident and had to pay back taxes. On the other hand, he would still have been eligible for free NHS care.

Posted

I'm not exactly cash rich but I'm travelling comfortably. I have about 4.5 million in assets albiet in my wifes name can this be used as security. I've been married to my Thai wife for close on 20 years. Little do these lawmakers know that us better class farangs do take care of our Thai wives family. I've taken care of several siblings but at this stage I'm taking care of her 60yo brother who's unemployable from a construction site injury and never received one satang compensation because he's an essan jungle bunny.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

Ah another visa requirement on top of the rest. It's getting tough isnt it.

 

I wonder does this apply to non immigrant O multiple entry visas where your stay is limited to a max of 90 days?

 

Yes I know, you can leave the country and come back the same day at land border entry points such as Savanekhet, my preferred choice ( and to get new visa) unless I am leaving for some time. But I do leave for some time. I only spend a max. of 5 months a year, split in to two periods, in Thailand so to be required to buy an annual policy seems unreasonable. Will we be required to show an in date insurance certificate each time at entry points?

Posted
23 minutes ago, madmen said:

looking at their link for Bangkok insurance its very reasonable . Between 50 and 60 years its approx 50k. Whats wrong with that.

its staggering the amount of expats living here with NO insurance!!  if your 70 then go home for gods sakes where you can be taken care of in an emergency..which is just around the corner , not everyone dies in their sleep

 

 http://www.bangkokinsurance.com/long-stay-visa/

Knowing what insurance companies are like.the first minute the rule is changed the websites will go down for a day and hey presto it'll double as we expats are swimming in pools of cash.as I've pointed out before Thais can't raise prices 10-20%.they go the full hog of 50% or more and especially when there is 10,000s of farang with bags of cash having to buy insurance.

Posted
Here's the other reason I plan to leave:

There is no stability.  You can not make plans for a life in Thailand.  The government will keep moving the goalpost.  They will keep implementing sanctions on foreigners in degrees that would never imposed on their own citizens.  
 
If you had planned to retire here, or to marry a Thai woman - think again.  Don't!
For those of you here who have been supporting a Thai family for over a decade?  Bend over.  Or leave.  I'm going to opt for the latter and I'll leave a broken family behind.  That's on the Thai government.  
Thailand is not for everyone.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

To quote Kevin Keegan, I would love it, just love it if this does not apply to extensions of permission to stay but when the Colonel Kathathorn quoted in the Phuket News article says:

 

I'm fairly sure that what he's talking about is one-year extensions of permission to stay based on retirement.

 

"Col Kathathorn also confirmed that the new insusrance requirement applies only to Non-Immigrant O-A "retirement" visas."   

 

A direct copy from the Phuket News article.   What I find odd is that as I understand it, O-A Visas are only administered in the Thai Embassies/Consuls of the applicants home country or permanent residence.   There local IO's would have zero involvement.

Posted
13 hours ago, Orac said:

Seem to be several plans up on their website already though not all companies have them. Pacific Cross have cheapest but still just over 30k a year for my 51-55 age bracket and nothing for over 75s.  Click  on each insurer for their plan and premium.

 

https://longstay.tgia.org/

 

             Chances are , the insurance company will be owned by the Thai Goverment.

            

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, bbi1 said:

Let's face it, as it was said many years ago, Thailand only want quality type of tourists with money to spend. They want the young guns these days (especially the Chinese) or older folks with enough money to live here, not the grey nomads with no money to spend who will be a burden when they don't pay their hospital bills as the article stated.

Workers from neighboring counties make up the vast majority of expats ..... I guess a few million day labors from neighboring countries are no problem for the Thai heath care system.....But a few 100,000 retired westerners are?

   

  • Like 2
Posted
12 hours ago, Gecko123 said:

The mandatory insurance requirement only requires a 400,000 policy limit. I am assuming self-insurance would only need to match this limit.

But that is logic and TIT!

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, fforest1 said:

Workers from neighboring counties make up the vast majority of expats ..... I guess a few million day labors from neighboring countries are no problem for the Thai heath care system.....But a few 100,000 retired westerners are?

   

 

They don't threat u anyway if you don't pay them except for emergency stuff, and that's most likely a traffic accident than and has nothing todo with over 50 yos, as likely  to happen or even more likely to happen to my 35yo ass.

 

There's no way they lose money on us westerners here in terms health care, most of us spend plenty of baht because we always go to samitivej, bumrungrad, bkk hospital and co and pay plenty for that.

 

I don't believe their reason for a second... all they want is more money prolly.

 

 

What's the reason i don't health insurance with elite visa? there's no <deleted> reason, i have one and i am as likely to get sick here as a retiree... 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...