Jump to content

Biodiversity key to every life on the planet


webfact

Recommended Posts

Biodiversity key to every life on the planet

By PRATCH RUJIVANAROM 
THE NATION

 

12a3cbd4bcf687b631c1ea2b61e4b56a.jpeg

 

THE GLOBAL community has to take immediate action to conserve biodiversity and maintain healthy ecosystems in order to avoid catastrophic consequences to every life brought about by the impact of human activities.

 

On the occasion of International Day for Biological Diversity today, international environmental experts insisted our health and well-being are directly connected and benefit from healthy ecosystems and biological diversity, so unless we stop the unsustainable exploitation of natural resources, we are endangering our own future. 

 

A statement from the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres iterated that we are heavily dependent on healthy ecosystems and rich biodiversity to maintain food security and well-being, as the water we drink, the food we eat and the air we breathe all depend on the natural world.

 

However, the ecosystems that sustain us are undergoing unprecedented harm, he said, citing a recent report from the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), which revealed that the world is losing its biological diversity at the fastest rate in the last 10 million years.

 

“The impact on people worldwide will be grave, as we projected that with the current negative trends in biodiversity and ecosystems, 80 per cent of the targets for Sustainable Development Goals [SDGs] will be undermined and we simply cannot allow this to happen,” Guterres said.

 

According to the report, humans are primarily behind the catastrophic degradation of the environment and the mass extinction of most flora and fauna species globally. It was found that over 75 per cent of the environment on land was severely altered by human activities and led to the extinction of at least 680 animal species, while pollution and overfishing are responsible for the up to 90 per cent decline of global marine fish stock.

 

Meanwhile, on the regional level, Mahidol University’s biology professor Philip Round revealed in an interview that the ecosystems and biodiversity in Southeast Asia are also increasingly pressured by deforestation, construction of harmful development projects, pollution and intensive use of farm chemicals.

 

“Even though Thailand has an outstanding wildlife conservation performance compared to other countries in the region, we have noticed that it still has a very high rate of ecological degradation and loss of biodiversity,” Round said.

 

“As I am a veteran birdwatcher and have been studying birds in Thailand for more than 40 years, I have noticed a great decline in many bird species that prey on insects. I have found that the vast reduction of insects from the intensive use of pesticides in farmlands is the main reason for the vanishing of many bird species.”

 

He said this vividly highlighted the link of each species in the web of life and cautioned that removing some species from the equation may result in a massive impact on the entire ecosystem and will inevitably affect our species.

 

He said that since some 75 per cent of our food crops rely on pollination, getting rid of insects will have a profound impact on our food security.

 

Pianporn Deetes, International Rivers campaigns director for Thailand and Myanmar, also cited the severe environmental degradation caused by large-scale hydropower development in the Mekong River Basin, which has already affected the livelihood and well-being of local people, especially in the aspect of local economy and food security.

 

Pianporn said the construction of hydropower dams in the Mekong mainstream has caused fish stocks to decline greatly. 

 

And, she said, it is estimated that with this trend, the fish population will be further reduced by up to 40 per cent by 2020. 

 

Nevertheless, Guterres said we can still avert a planet-wide ecological breakdown by halting environmentally harmful practices, diversifying our food systems and promoting more sustainable production and consumption patterns. However, he said, we must act quickly to reverse these trends and promote transformative change.

 

“On this International Day for Biological Diversity, I urge all – governments, businesses and civil society – to take urgent action to protect and sustainably manage the fragile and vital web of life on our one and only planet,” he said.

 

The International Day for Biological Diversity is marked on May 22 every year with the intention of raising public awareness on the importance of biological conservation. 

 

The theme this year is “Our Biodiversity, Our Food, Our Health”.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30369774

 

thenation_logo.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, webfact said:

conserve biodiversity and maintain healthy ecosystems

Keeping mind that its "domestic" and not "foreign" biodiversity.

Killer Bees come immediately to mind but foreign intrusion by the same for snakes, insects and animals are common threats to domestic biodiversity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Srikcir said:

Keeping mind that its "domestic" and not "foreign" biodiversity.

Killer Bees come immediately to mind but foreign intrusion by the same for snakes, insects and animals are common threats to domestic biodiversity.

Without human interference , evolution will take care of that .

Nothing stays the same forever , change will lead to more changes ... if left alone , Nature will balance itself again .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could always increase our CO2 emissions. That would help the existing forests to flourish and help conserve biodiversity, and also speed up any reforestation that should be part of the policy to conserve biodiversity. ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VincentRJ said:

We could always increase our CO2 emissions. That would help the existing forests to flourish and help conserve biodiversity, and also speed up any reforestation that should be part of the policy to conserve biodiversity. ????

Get ready to duck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barring a natural catastrophe, species rise and fall is typically a VERY slow process, hundreds of thousands of years. It should be highly improbable for even one species to go extinct in our lifetime. But we have hundreds. It is clear that something is very, very wrong, and the direction is not a good one. The price will be paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, VincentRJ said:

We could always increase our CO2 emissions. That would help the existing forests to flourish and help conserve biodiversity, and also speed up any reforestation that should be part of the policy to conserve biodiversity. ????

I think your cunning plan fails at the point where they chop off the forests for profit as soon as a tree is knee high. Tomatoes would be good though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DrTuner said:

I think your cunning plan fails at the point where they chop off the forests for profit as soon as a tree is knee high. Tomatoes would be good though.

No, no! That's only part of the plan. There must also be laws and regulations in place to prevent further deforestation, and also policies implemented to grow new forests.

 

However, when such laws are broken or not enforced, which often tends to happen, the higher CO2 levels will at least compensate to some extent for the reduced area of forest. ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, VincentRJ said:

We could always increase our CO2 emissions. That would help the existing forests to flourish and help conserve biodiversity, and also speed up any reforestation that should be part of the policy to conserve biodiversity. ????

& what excuse could the powers that are use to increase taxes then? ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CGW said:

& what excuse could the powers that are use to increase taxes then? ????

Cheaper power costs as a result of combining the most efficient renewables with the most efficient fossil fuel energy, without being obsessive about CO2 emissions and instead use the most effective emissions controls for the real pollutants that harm health.

 

Windmills should be banned because they contribute towards species extinction, such as birds and bats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...