Jump to content

U.S. won't 'tiptoe' around China with Asia stability at threat - defence chief


Jonathan Fairfield

Recommended Posts

U.S. won't 'tiptoe' around China with Asia stability at threat - defence chief

By Idrees Ali

 

2019-06-01T013955Z_1_LYNXNPEF502DG_RTROPTP_4_ASIA-SECURITY.JPG

 

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - The United States will no longer "tiptoe" around Chinese behaviour in Asia, with stability in the region at threat on issues ranging from the South China Sea to Taiwan, acting U.S. Defence Secretary Patrick Shanahan said on Saturday.

 

Shanahan did not directly name China when making accusations of "actors" destabilising the region, but went on to say the United States would not ignore Chinese behaviour, the latest in the exchange of acerbic remarks between the world's two biggest economies. He however added he was keen to foster a military relationship with Beijing.

 

"Perhaps the greatest long-term threat to the vital interests of states across this region comes from actors who seek to undermine, rather than uphold, the rules-based international order," Shanahan said at the annual Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia's biggest security gathering.

 

"If the trends in these behaviours continue, artificial features in the global commons could become tollbooths, sovereignty could become the purview of the powerful."

 

Shanahan's first major speech since taking over as acting defence secretary in January came as the United States and China remain locked in an escalating trade war and at odds over a range of security issues in Asia.

 

His reference to artificial features was a swipe at islands built by China in the disputed South China Sea, a strategic waterway claimed almost wholly by Beijing.

 

"We're not going to ignore Chinese behaviour and I think in the past people have kind of tiptoed around that," Shanahan said later in answer to a question.

 

He said it was in Beijing's interests to have a constructive relationship with the United States.

 

But he added: "Behaviour that erodes other nations' sovereignty and sows distrust of China's intentions must end."

"Until it does, we stand against a myopic, narrow, and parochial vision of the future, and we stand for the free and open order that has benefited us all - including China."

 

TRADE WAR

 

Shanahan said that he did not see the current trade dispute between China and the United States as a trade war, but rather just part of trade negotiations.

 

An increase in Chinese tariffs on most U.S. imports on a $60 billion target list took effect as planned on Saturday, after Washington’s own tariff increases.

 

Shanahan also became the latest senior U.S. official to call out Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, saying in his speech that it was too close to the Chinese government.

 

The United States has accused Huawei of espionage, breaching trade sanctions against Iran and intellectual property theft. Huawei disputes all allegations.

 

China's Defence Minister Wei Fenghe is due to address Asia's marquee security summit on Sunday when he is expected to criticise the United States over its implied support for a democratic Taiwan.

 

On Friday, Shanahan held talks with Wei that both sides called "constructive", although their teams later reverted to type with critical comments on each other's defence strategies.

 

Along with the expected warnings aimed at China, Shanahan referred to cooperation between the two countries in areas like military-to-military exchanges, counter-piracy and joint efforts to reduce the "extraordinary threat" posed by North Korea's military ambitions.

 

"I am confident that we'll solve problems," Shanahan said.

 

Shanahan also called on U.S. allies to contribute more to their own defences. Burden sharing, from Asia to Europe, has long been a demand of President Donald Trump's administration.

 

"We need you to invest in ways that take more control over your sovereignty and your own ability to exercise sovereign choices."

 

(Reporting by Idrees Ali; additional reporting by Joe Brock, Lee Chyen Yee and Aradhana Aravindan; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-05-20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Kasane said:

"Perhaps the greatest long-term threat to the vital interests of states across this region comes from actors who seek to undermine, rather than uphold, the rules-based international order," says the country who is tearing up sacred treaties all over the planet. Hypocrites.

 

Ummm..."sacred"? Surely not.

And as above - the current administration certainly got a strong (and, IMO, wrong) take on issues relating to international cooperation and commitments. Applying this as a general USA policy, not really.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, the guest said:

If China joins up with Russia, then the USA would have a big problem on its hands.

 

Fantasies are free. China isn't going to "join" with Russia or vice versa.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, soalbundy said:

Of course they do, they just aren't being so hypocritical about it

 

How are they not being hypocritical about it? If the keywords was "so", then yes, obviously countries who aren't superpowers got less chances to be hypocritical about such things.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Morch is a firm believer in 

 

https://www.yourdictionary.com/my-country-right-or-wrong

 

Phrase
an expression of patriotism.
Usage notes
Frequently used either as an expression of jingoism (extreme patriotism), in the sense “I will stand by my country whether it be right or wrong”, or as a straw man to attack such patriotism as unthinking.

Origin
Originally Stephen Decatur, in an after-dinner toast of 1816–1820:

“Our Country! In her intercourse with foreign nations may she always be in the right; but right or wrong, our country!”
Later stated by, and often attributed to, Carl Schurz, 1872.

“My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right.”

 

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Stephen-Decatur

Ah..Stephen Decatur was  great sailor-but whether you would take him as the polar star of informed patriotism is another matter,indeed.

Edited by Odysseus123
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, the guest said:

If China joins up with Russia, then the USA would have a big problem on its hands.

the original idea was to 'trade' with China in order to drive a wedge between them and Russia. I have to agree in theory with most of the comments; America should give up being the superpower policeman of the world and concentrate on the Homeland. Bring all troops home including the navy, there is an entire continent to protect.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, oilinki said:

Who knows at this stage what the world is currently?

 

It's well known secret that Russia asked permission from the USA to nuke Peking. Fortunately it didn't happen, but naturally the Chinese remember these stories. 

 

Then again, China joined to one of the largest Russian military drill. That was a show of power against USA.

 

Now that USA has started it's trade war against both Russia and the Europe, due it's Freedom Molecules. Trying to block Russian gas flowing to the Europe. 

 

This is not going to end well with the USA, which is fighting economically against pretty much everybody at the moment. 

 

The rest of the world is going to stop, breath, think and act. That act will be against USA, if USA doesn't stop bullying against everybody.

 

The USA Administration  has  never stopped it's  abuses and  manipulation of even it's  own  gullible  home  grown patriot  war fodder under the  guise  of  democratic  freedom. The legitimacy  of that ruse  is now coming into increasing  question .

The  current  alienation and isolating policies are basically  a declaration  of invitation to test the long held propagandist assumption of superiority.

A dangerous situation  for the  world  given the pointless  havoc  that is  capable of all sides in provoked reaction.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, oilinki said:

As long as USA has a sensible leader, which it doesn't have currently, western unity will hold. 

 

If USA is gone, the other western countries, which hold the same values of their people's freedoms, will create a new union. 

 

I would say at that point the EU will have to step up to become the new western powerhouse. It takes time, but at least the ideology has already started to arise due unpredictability of the USA.

 

Perhaps..

But one hopes that the US will get rid of this twittering lunatic and return to more normal times.

 

They are perfectly capable of doing this if they can get their head around it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oilinki said:

Who knows at this stage what the world is currently?

 

It's well known secret that Russia asked permission from the USA to nuke Peking. Fortunately it didn't happen, but naturally the Chinese remember these stories. 

 

Then again, China joined to one of the largest Russian military drill. That was a show of power against USA.

 

Now that USA has started it's trade war against both Russia and the Europe, due it's Freedom Molecules. Trying to block Russian gas flowing to the Europe. 

 

This is not going to end well with the USA, which is fighting economically against pretty much everybody at the moment. 

 

The rest of the world is going to stop, breath, think and act. That act will be against USA, if USA doesn't stop bullying against everybody.

 

 

I think most of the World realizes that Trump is not a permanent feature, and that (hopefully sooner the later) the USA will get back to track. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oilinki said:

As long as USA has a sensible leader, which it doesn't have currently, western unity will hold. 

 

If USA is gone, the other western countries, which hold the same values of their people's freedoms, will create a new union. 

 

I would say at that point the EU will have to step up to become the new western powerhouse. It takes time, but at least the ideology has already started to arise due unpredictability of the USA.

 

 

I think that's a very optimistic take on how things could unfold. Nothing seen from Europe and the EU today inspires a whole lot of confidence in their ability to unite - at least not in a manner positioning the EU as a global power able to counterbalance the likes of Russia and China.

 

That's pretty much why I see the USA as essential, warts and all. Not a knight in shining armor. Just better than the alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the US has been tip toeing.  I liked President Obama, good dude, good orator, but he was weak on this, and his Secretary of State on the vassal puppet state, N. Korea.

 

Trump, while lacking bedside manner and anything resembling diplomatic aplomb and a decent hair cut, is fk'ing them off in a way they aren't used to - but in a way they would do themselves if necessary.  Easily.  Certainly. 

 

They are punching back now.  Both sides still jabbing, regarding each other's potential, their own losses and how much they are willing to accept.  Trump is more erratic and brash than his patient opponent who sees things in much  longer term views.  Trump is a moron but he's not entirely wrong in the essence of what he's doing.  And he's trying to do it in 4 years (or maybe 8, but who knows).  Something Xi doesn't have to worry about.

 

These Chinese a**holes don't respect weakness and they'll fk you at the drive-thru if you let them.  Same with the Arabs. 

 

They've had their run for long enough and it's about time somebody recognized their BS and punched back instead of kissing their a** 'cause we like the prices at Walmart.  It's going to get worse before it gets better, but in the long run, these ham-handed actions just might put the Chinese back in their place, as long as it's on their own terms and they can save a little face.

 

I'm not betting on it because the log has floated down the river long enough, but there's a chance.  They are smart.  They have leverage.  Trump is playing what hand the US has left.  Americans, and by extension many parts of the world, will pay a price for his actions.  Short term pain for potential long term gains, which may never happen, but at least he can't say he didn't try. 

 

Big ups @riclag  ????

 

Edited by 55Jay
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""