UK finance minister 'livid' at PM Johnson over firing of aide - media

[Nigel Garvie]

7 hours ago, nontabury said:

I’ve heard this same talk from many remainers, regarding those who Democratically voted to leave. And that includes remoaners here on T.V.

 

 

I've never seen posts on TV about inferior genes, or people being (Naturally) superior, from Leavers or Remainers, this isn't the sort of thing that normal decent people say, it smacks of racism.  Maybe you could give me one example of a remainer saying this, I don't mean saying that someone is stupid, or has done something stupid, I mean inferior genes .....rather different.

 

Or did you warm to his charming words?

[MarineEquine]

On 8/31/2019 at 9:03 AM, RuamRudy said:

The word 'traitor' is being bandied about with more and more frequency of late. Is this insertion also tongue in cheek?

No. It's quite simple. British people who put the interests of the EEC ahead of the UK are traitors to the UK. 

[stevenl]

27 minutes ago, MarineEquine said:

No. It's quite simple. British people who put the interests of the EEC ahead of the UK are traitors to the UK. 

Since it is clear that staying in the EU is best for Britain all brexiteers are traitors?

[7by7]

13 hours ago, MarineEquine said:

No. It's quite simple. British people who put the interests of the EEC ahead of the UK are traitors to the UK. 

 Remainers are British people who think that it is in the best interests of the UK to remain a member of the EU are not putting the interests of the EU above those of the UK; ergo by your own definition are not traitors.

 

[Forethat]

15 hours ago, stevenl said:

Since it is clear that staying in the EU is best for Britain all brexiteers are traitors?

Excuse me? Since when did you become spokesman for 17 million voters? And more importantly, how do you know what's important to them?

 

The simple answer is: you don't.

[joecoolfrog]

On 9/2/2019 at 4:42 AM, MarineEquine said:

No. It's quite simple. British people who put the interests of the EEC ahead of the UK are traitors to the UK. 

Possibly the most simplistic nonsense I have read on the subject, it really is a classic lol.

[joecoolfrog]

12 hours ago, Forethat said:

Excuse me? Since when did you become spokesman for 17 million voters? And more importantly, how do you know what's important to them?

 

The simple answer is: you don't.

He was being ironic , in response to a truly ridiculous post.

[7by7]

12 hours ago, Forethat said:

On 9/2/2019 at 5:10 AM, stevenl said:

Since it is clear that staying in the EU is best for Britain all brexiteers are traitors?

Excuse me? Since when did you become spokesman for 17 million voters? And more importantly, how do you know what's important to them?

 

The simple answer is: you don't.

 

Where does he claim to speak for them?

 

The simple answer is: he doesn't.

 

Where does he claim to know what's important to them?

 

The simple answer is; he doesn't.

 

He is asking a question; as indicated by the question mark at the end!

 

[Forethat]

49 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

 

Where does he claim to speak for them?

 

The simple answer is: he doesn't.

 

Where does he claim to know what's important to them?

 

The simple answer is; he doesn't.

 

He is asking a question; as indicated by the question mark at the end!

 

It's a statement (several, actually) disguised as a question. A classic method of trying to lure your opponent to accept a false statement by answering the question. 

Let me demonstrate:

 

You always wan't to have the last word, right? (note that I'm asking a question; as indicated by the question mark at the end!)

 

Glad to have helped!

Edited September 3, 2019 by Forethat

[7by7]

4 hours ago, Forethat said:

It's a statement (several, actually) disguised as a question. A classic method of trying to lure your opponent to accept a false statement by answering the question. 

Let me demonstrate:

 

You always wan't to have the last word, right? (note that I'm asking a question; as indicated by the question mark at the end!)

 

Glad to have helped!

 

Ah, you have produced the usual Brexiteer spin.

 

If he made a statement disguised as a question it was only one, not several.

 

Despite your claims to the contrary he did not claim to speak for or know what's important to anyone.

 

That is my last word on that post, but I doubt it will be yours.

[7by7]

On 8/31/2019 at 5:32 PM, 7by7 said:

On 8/31/2019 at 5:26 PM, evadgib said:

On 8/31/2019 at 4:23 PM, 7by7 said:

<snip>

So one of her last three political bosses was a Remainer and two were Brexiteers; what does that prove?

<snip>

That It was you

<snip>

What was me?

 Since you are going on elsewhere about me not answering questions; it's time you answered this one!

 

I suspect it's that I was the person who posted that Ms Khan was a leaver; in which case you are wrong. As you would know had you bothered to read the topic before commenting!

 

Not the first time you've made that mistake; doubt it will be the last.

[stevenl]

6 hours ago, 7by7 said:

 

Where does he claim to speak for them?

 

The simple answer is: he doesn't.

 

Where does he claim to know what's important to them?

 

The simple answer is; he doesn't.

 

He is asking a question; as indicated by the question mark at the end!

 

Thanks, but no worries. This poster is on my ignore list, so I don't get riled by his provocations.

 

But I can read yours and you're correct, I did not or pretend to speak for others.

Edited September 3, 2019 by stevenl

[evadgib]

2 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

 Since you are going on elsewhere about me not answering questions; it's time you answered this one!

 

I suspect it's that I was the person who posted that Ms Khan was a leaver; in which case you are wrong. As you would know had you bothered to read the topic before commenting!

 

Not the first time you've made that mistake; doubt it will be the last.

Lighten up 49; the question mark was self explanatory and would not have been questioned had I not been a B-B-Brexiter.

[7by7]

26 minutes ago, evadgib said:

Lighten up 49; the question mark was self explanatory and would not have been questioned had I not been a B-B-Brexiter.

No question mark in your post, evadetheissue!!

 

Your post in full

On 8/31/2019 at 5:26 PM, evadgib said:

That It was you & that my mugshot training remain as sharp as ever after all these years ????

(Glad to see you're on form 49!)

 So, if my assumption is wrong, what was me?

[evadgib]

51 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

No question mark in your post, evadetheissue!!

 

Your post in full

 So, if my assumption is wrong, what was me?

As you cannot see the error further input is pointless.

+ 

[7by7]

4 minutes ago, evadgib said:

As you cannot see the error further input is pointless.

+ 

 

I can see your error; that you won't admit to it is par for the course..

[Laughing Gravy]

I am looking forward to the GE.

Edited September 4, 2019 by Laughing Gravy