Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, BritTim said:

Technically, "years" could theoretically be "0.25 years". However, colloquially, when we say "years ago" this usually means "several years ago", possibly three but probably longer.

"possibly three but probably longer."

Yes,that's the way I use "years ago",

it's a way to emphasize that it was several years back. 3 years (in this case less than 3 years) is in my opinion not very long ago.

 

Posted
11 hours ago, Number 6 said:

Who the hell has or even wants citizenship

I'm  sure thousands who moan on here every day about TM30, money in the bank, etc

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Troll?

 

Do you remember the German stupido who helped his Thai GF with selling chicken barbeque?

Not enough: he had pictures and video taken for FB and a Thai TV station.

Big fun/applause on day1.

Day2: no fun, immigration watch TV too, arrested, been on overstay(!), due for deportation.

 

A German mate made "jokes" about me when he saw me cutting the gras in front of the house (brushcutter). "Do you have a work permit").

Edited by KhunBENQ
  • Confused 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, JohnnyBKK said:

Immigration is reading this topic it seems, they saw a farang working in the market and they went for it directly. 

The article wasn't about any farang.

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, BritTim said:

Technically, "years" could theoretically be "0.25 years". However, colloquially, when we say "years ago" this usually means "several years ago", possibly three but probably longer.

Well it is nearly three, so why is everyone on my back? What dull lives some of you guys out there live! Running out of grammar to correct?

Edited by jacko45k
Posted

It can be extreme sometimes. There was a Belgian guy sitting everyday in the bar of his Thai wife, speaking to fellow Belgian customers. He got in trouble, he was told he was a kind of his wife's bar public relation, and was entertaining customers, and therefore needed a w.p..

 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, luckyluke said:

It can be extreme sometimes. There was a Belgian guy sitting everyday in the bar of his Thai wife, speaking to fellow Belgian customers. He got in trouble, he was told he was a kind of his wife's bar public relation, and was entertaining customers, and therefore needed a w.p..

What about all those farangs bar manager pimping girls to other sexpats? Do they also need WP?

Posted
55 minutes ago, luckyluke said:

It can be extreme sometimes. There was a Belgian guy sitting everyday in the bar of his Thai wife, speaking to fellow Belgian customers. He got in trouble, he was told he was a kind of his wife's bar public relation, and was entertaining customers, and therefore needed a w.p..

 

 

Amazing, surely he could have claimed to simply be a customer. 

Obviously someone complained and then the police were obliged to investigate, then obliged to extort. 

  • Like 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, onera1961 said:

What about all those farangs bar manager pimping girls to other sexpats? Do they also need WP?

There are other ways to not been annoyed by authorities.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jacko45k said:

Well it is nearly three, so why is everyone on my back? What dull lives some of you guys out there live! Running out of grammar to correct?

if the soft opening was in 2015 would it be nearly 4 years ?

Posted
7 minutes ago, Don Mega said:

if the soft opening was in 2015 would it be nearly 4 years ?

You are correct, thank you. I wonder if it yet qualifies as 'some years back'?  

Posted
1 hour ago, luckyluke said:

It can be extreme sometimes. There was a Belgian guy sitting everyday in the bar of his Thai wife, speaking to fellow Belgian customers. He got in trouble, he was told he was a kind of his wife's bar public relation, and was entertaining customers, and therefore needed a w.p..

 

 

That's bs. As long as he doesn't do anything in the bar,he can sit there 24/7. Especially when the bar belongs to his wife.

Posted
13 minutes ago, spiekerjozef said:

I've seen the french owner of Dom Pizza on pratumnak hill serve food

That's against the law. An owner can never serve food in a restaurant,even in his own,but I think he knows that. 

Posted
Just now, Max69xl said:

That's bs

I am agree with you, but by paying some "contribution" he was left alone. 

 

Of course there are "warriors" who are ready to argue with the reprensatives of the authority. 

 

Usually not, but some may even win. 

 

I am personally 19 years in Thailand, I abide. 

 

The day I will consider something as  too much", I will leave, not trying to change the system in place. 

 

But of course we are all different. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Max69xl said:

That's against the law. An owner can never serve food in a restaurant,even in his own,but I think he knows that. 

Sometimes those guys can have a WP as a specialist chef.

Russian girls wait tables etc but have WP as entertainers/dancers.

Posted

This topic appears of run its course since it has gone way off topic and the OP got his answer several pages ago.

This topic now :mfr_closed1:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...