Jump to content

Trump communication with foreign leader prompted whistleblower complaint -Washington Post


Recommended Posts

Posted

The report says it happened during a phone call to a foreign leader.  Trump "interacted with" five other leaders in the last five weeks, but only spoke to one of them on the phone:

 

"The (Washington) Post reported that Trump interacted with at least five foreign leaders in the five weeks before the whistleblower filed their complaint: Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, Pakistani prime minister Imran Khan, Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte, and Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, the emir of Qatar.

Putin is the only one Trump is known to have spoken on the phone with, a call Trump initiated."

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-subject-of-whistleblower-complaint-odni-2019-9

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, ballpoint said:

The report says it happened during a phone call to a foreign leader.  Trump "interacted with" five other leaders in the last five weeks, but only spoke to one of them on the phone:

 

"The (Washington) Post reported that Trump interacted with at least five foreign leaders in the five weeks before the whistleblower filed their complaint: Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, Pakistani prime minister Imran Khan, Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte, and Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, the emir of Qatar.

Putin is the only one Trump is known to have spoken on the phone with, a call Trump initiated."

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-subject-of-whistleblower-complaint-odni-2019-9

I believe the call was made on july 31

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Tug said:

Curious to know what he did to freak out the intelligence guy so much he would risk his career pension and all kinds of trouble crossing a vindictive trump must have been very serious indeed

Under the Whistleblower Protection Act the government as the employer cannot take any personnel action against an employee because of the employee protected whistleblowing. See 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8).

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, stevenl said:

So the inspector general is not objective. That's the only possible conclusion from your post.

in your mind it is i guess. I guess you can ignore the previous claims made by others as to preconceived guilt and results, that would not be objective though

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...