Jump to content

Thailand to demand proof of health insurance for 'risky' long-term visitors


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Samui Bodoh said:

I do not have a problem requiring visitors to have health insurance; it is simply a good idea.

 

However, the quote above leaves me speechless. Are there any valid figures to show a lack of repayment? Especially by long-stayers? Generally all I hear about are tourists, not long-term stayers, who don't have insurance and end up with a 'Go fund me' page.

 

Add a few Baht tax to all plane tickets/landings, use the money to aid foreigners hurt in the Kingdom, and problem solved.

 

It doesn't need to occur like this, and thus makes me wonder what else is at play...

 

People without real jobs with way too much time on their hands trying to look busy and useful.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Momofarang said:

Agree, it is indeed an obvious requirement. But, as with all things Thai, the solution is driven solely by corruption and utter intellectual laziness.

Correct, even more so when you take the word 'intellectual' out of the sentence

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, happysanook said:

Add a few Baht tax to all plane tickets/landings

Didn't they already do that?  I faintly recall some amount being added to the tax of flight tickets a while back.  Is it time for another go at the trough?

does anyone recall a tax being added already to cover medical emergency

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Samui Bodoh said:

I do not have a problem requiring visitors to have health insurance; it is simply a good idea.

 

However, the quote above leaves me speechless. Are there any valid figures to show a lack of repayment? Especially by long-stayers? Generally all I hear about are tourists, not long-term stayers, who don't have insurance and end up with a 'Go fund me' page.

 

Add a few Baht tax to all plane tickets/landings, use the money to aid foreigners hurt in the Kingdom, and problem solved.

 

It doesn't need to occur like this, and thus makes me wonder what else is at play...

 

Ive always paid cash in full anytime ive got medical care here ir anywhere else excpet back in america where i made payments to the hospital if bill too high still after insurance. But i have never not paid my medical bills. I for one wont trust my money with a thai insurance company thus leaves me with signa which is anywhere from 300-650 a month usd for insurance. 

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Estrada said:

This is just a repeat of yesterday's news on Thai Visa/Nation which clearly stated that this applies for applications for O-A visas from outside Thailand which does not apply to Non-O retirement visas and extensions.

You are right. Reuters report very generally so haven't gone into the specifics.

 

However, it wouldn't surprise me if this is just the beginning and that this requirement will at some point be applied to those on extensions of stay without a work permit (they should be covered under the Government healthcare scheme).

 

Some people have extensions of stay based on an original OA visa. I assume they will have to hold health insurance but that hasn't been made clear.

 

I can see this issue evolving over the next year or so. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I never leave home without credit card insurance, which probably won't be accepted,  will have to start back on tourist visas as they are exempt from everything. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, reargunnerph3 said:

I broken my leg in Pattaya playing softball and went to Bangkok Hospital Pattaya, I got a quote for the operation when the results of the x-rays came back and negotiated the price down to Bt52,000 and had to pay by credit card before the operation. I would find it hard to believe anyone gets free medical treatment in Thailand.

They did do a great job.

 

Was it a complex procedure or just really good plaster of Paris?

Posted
1 hour ago, jesimps said:

Even if fit, financially secure and self-insures because he doesn't want to waste a massive amount of his hard-earned every year?

There is many of us, who never will have problems with the new rules or terms, but there is to many with bad health, minimum pentions and risky lifestyle who live a unhealthy life on the top of bad health. This group is growing with the stronger baht, and have no security left. Incan understand Thailand want them out, bu is it fair? Fair for who?

 

My concern is, do I want them to control me and my choices for my insurance and possibillities for taking care of myself? 

 

I still have social security back home, social security support if something happens to me here, outpatient cost covered, Insurance privat hospital back home, and travel insurance with evacuation since I travel back for work every second month or so. 

 

I have double up, and still not good enough for the new plan. How they going to sort out those who can take care of themselves and not?

  • Like 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, Estrada said:

This is just a repeat of yesterday's news on Thai Visa/Nation which clearly stated that this applies for applications for O-A visas from outside Thailand which does not apply to Non-O retirement visas and extensions.

It appears that it applies only to those obtaining Non-Immigrant O-A Visas in their country of residence AND for an extension of stay that was based on entry using the O-A Visa.  The article on ThaiVisa that appeared yesterday noted that information was based on new Immigration rules for extensions with a note that the Foreign Ministry rules (which will govern applications for and issuance the O-A Visa was to be announced later that afternoon). As I recall, postings indicated that the Ministry of FA rules will permit health insurance from other than the Thai health insurance policies listed on a link (my understanding is that those policies -- which have been required for the O-X Visa for some time -- will be for the 400k inpatient and 40k outpatient amounts, but will cover only services at a Government Hospital) - but, I haven't seen as yet any info on what the Ministry of FA will require.

 

The Immigration rules for extensions of stay if based on an O-A Visa seem fairly clear, it will require a Thai health insurance policy that will cover the one-year extension period obtained from those policies listed on the link -- I am not that familiar with their requirements, but would be interested to know if they have an age restriction - if not, then probably some exorbitant premiums for the more elderly.  Here is link to Immigration webpage showing the new rules - in Thai and English: https://www.immigration.go.th/read?content_id=5d9c3b074d8a8f318362a8aa&fbclid=IwAR39UI_zBxVLedZKgZeAeYnvb0yyyIsr6SHPhnq64ohzACO7VsLUU_LlGn0  - it has a pdf file showing the rules which can be downloaded if you want to keep a copy.  The link to the health insurance policies for O-A Visa is:  http://longstay.tgia.org/home/companiesoa

Posted
4 hours ago, dave s said:

500,000,000/80,000=6,250. By the figures in the article, on average, every single expat in Thailand stiffs a hospital for over 6,000 baht every single year. Every single expat, not one of whom they can collect from, despite TM28, TM30, TM6, multiple TM47 reports, ad nauseum. And no reporter at this press shindig waved their hand and said, "Yoooo-ooo, Minister Pitutecha, isn't this absolute proof that all the mindless immigration paperwork is useless and should be abolished?"

True,I'm still trying to work out who gets away without paying their medical bills,apart from the two week stayers that have accidents and are taken in unconscious,most I'm sure do pay up. my visits to hospitals,clinics for treatment are always started off with them taking copies of my passport,always been that way,and no doubt my visa,the first time of my many visits for higher cost bills just meant a deposit of approximately fifty percent of the possible costs, the last visit some years ago they nicely asked if I would mind paying all the possibly cost upfront before the small operation,looks like I'm one of those 'At risk' ones,and no way will I pay the insurance costs they want,even if I could find one, looks like it's getting near to suitcase packing time, this has to be a male hating women's logic,

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, davidstipek said:

Most of us had to pay before being treated!

You are talking about privat hospitals, local government hospitals will treath you without paying up front! 

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...