Jump to content

Activist Thunberg denounces "creative PR" in climate fight


Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Sure thing, temperature readings were much more reliable in the 19th century than they are now 

two decimal thermometer improvement does not negate urban asphalt surrounding impact

Posted
6 minutes ago, brokenbone said:

two decimal thermometer improvement does not negate urban asphalt surrounding impact

Lol, you really think 19th century readings are more reliable than today's.

That says more than enough.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/12/2019 at 10:19 PM, Lacessit said:

 

Meantime, don't buy  any real estate in Bangkok. A city only 1 metre above sea level doesn't strike me as a good long-term investment. Bet the financial advisers are not saying that.

there are two tide gauges in bkk region,

one shows rapid sea rise and the other very little.

one of the tide gauges was built on fill dirt in a swamp,

the other on solid ground.

the gauge built on fill dirt in a swamp project flood by 2050,

the one on solid ground project flood by year 8000 (western counting)

not saying it is, but it could be that the alarmists mixed

up sinking station with rising sea level,

it wouldnt be the first time they got it 180 degree wrong

 

this is, btw, a direct analogy to the issues of thermometer placement

in urban surroundings these days, just swap swamp/asphalt/urban

depending on what you are trying to measure,

its going to give false readings either way you cut it

 

EDIT By Crossy.  Graphs sourced here 

https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.shtml?stnid=600-041

bkk sea rise 1.jpg

bkk sea rise 2.jpg

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, brokenbone said:

there are two tide gauges in bkk region,

one shows rapid sea rise and the other very little.

one of the tide gauges was built on fill dirt in a swamp,

the other on solid ground.

the gauge built on fill dirt in a swamp project flood by 2050,

the one on solid ground project flood by year 8000 (western counting)

bkk sea rise 1.jpg

bkk sea rise 2.jpg

top one is sinking

Posted
17 minutes ago, nauseus said:

top one is sinking

youre just ruining our panic-party, party pooper pooping all over anxiety, how dare you ?

 

on a more serious note, it brings up a problem that has emanate

lately. your typical climate scientist would combine both data

to formalize it, and present an undeniable upward trend,

this has been done in historical temperature record,

while the obvious logical way would be to dismiss poor data altogether.

this illustrate how sh!t data from sh!t stations are, sometimes

with sinister intent, used to mess up history and predictions,

and humanity would be a whole wide world better off

with fewer high quality stations,

its stuff like this that causes misinformation & hysteria

Posted
18 minutes ago, brokenbone said:

youre just ruining our panic-party, party pooper pooping all over anxiety, how dare you ?

 

on a more serious note, it brings up a problem that has emanate

lately. your typical climate scientist would combine both data

to formalize it, and present an undeniable upward trend,

this has been done in historical temperature record,

while the obvious logical way would be to dismiss poor data altogether.

this illustrate how sh!t data from sh!t stations are, sometimes

with sinister intent, used to mess up history and predictions,

and humanity would be a whole wide world better off

with fewer high quality stations,

its stuff like this that causes misinformation & hysteria

I'm serious.

Posted
On ‎12‎/‎12‎/‎2019 at 12:42 AM, snoop1130 said:

“I still believe the biggest danger is not inaction, the real danger is when politicians and CEOs are making it look like real action is happening when in fact almost nothing is being done apart from clever accounting and creative PR,” she added.

She's correct there, but it's because no one outside the bubble of climate change religion believes in it, IMO. Too afraid to come out openly, they just do nothing while pretending to do something.

 

On ‎12‎/‎12‎/‎2019 at 12:42 AM, snoop1130 said:

“To stay below 1.5 degrees we need to keep the carbon in the ground.”

Yet no one can prove that, and I'm pretty sure that keeping the carbon in the ground from here on would consign most of the world's people to starvation. How does little miss knowitall think farmers grow food these days? Plough horses are in short supply now.

Posted
2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

Take a look at what mass tourism has done to Halong Bay.

A symbol of overpopulation. Anyone that wants to think about it knows that the cause of pollution is humanity. As population increases, so does pollution, ergo the simplest way to solve the problem is to stop population rise, and reduce population in the future.

Yet no one in the climate alarmist camp is touting sterilisation as a good thing for the believers to do. Wonder why?

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Lacessit said:

You think Obama or his heirs won't have sold off the seaside property before 2100? At a handsome profit? It's called kicking the can down the road.

The dismal science has a central assumption economic growth can go on indefinitely. It's the mantra of all politicians. Logical nonsense, because it is only recently the environmental and social costs of economic growth have started to be taken into account. The barges that trundle New York's waste out into the Atlantic will only stop when the sea starts to stink - or maybe not even then. Take a look at what mass tourism has done to Halong Bay.

Entropy is at work, and we need to get clever. 

Re your point about Obama's hot property. Neither he nor his heirs are likely to get a decent deal from its resale except from buyers unaware of the sea level scare or dyed-in-the-wool deniers!

 

Your views on the undesireability of ongoing economic growth based primarily on the use of fossil fuels is shared by Cory Morningstar, who actually demonstrates how the biggest polluters have hijacked the climate activist movement to (to quote a phrase in one of your earlier emails) ensure "business as usual" for the foreseeable future. Plus, would you believe, a additional business and fat profits from fourth industrial revolution based around finding "green" solutions to the problems they have created!

 

I totally agree regarding the need urgently to tackle pollution of the air, sea and land - which kills and maims millions of us every year. Unfortunately, the funds needed to ameliorate this problem are being mopped up by our preoccupation with a distant global warming catastrophe that might not materialise.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 12/11/2019 at 7:48 PM, rabas said:

China is by far the worlds' greatest CO2 emitter, particularity from coal. US and Western countries are both much lower and declining relative to China.

 

One country and person in particular would benefit greatly by shutting down Western oil oil production while ignoring global warming. Russia and its richest man Putin.

 

-- Russia wants to sell as much oil as possible at the highest price possible.

-- Russia would also benefit heavily from a warming climate. One of Russia's greatest weaknesses is food production because it is far north, and it relies heavily on Ukraine, the Soviet Union's traditional break basket.

-- Russia has no coast lines threatened by sea level rise.

-- Russia also has no warm water ports and its navy has trouble projecting power from cold water ports.

-- Russia wants to unlock vast oil reserves in the Arctic which is hampered by sea ice.

-- Russia could hold summer Olympics!

 

CO2 is not the problem.  It's some of the other chemicals that emanate from the coal fired power stations.   India and Prickistan are just as bad but on a smaller scale compared to China.  

Posted
13 hours ago, Lacessit said:

Oh dear, rational discussion being subsumed by pejoratives. You've already stated you were part of the fossil fuel industry, so what's wrong with me taking that into account?

Because it is IRRELEVANT... but you started it.

 

13 hours ago, Lacessit said:

In case it has escaped your notice, renewable energy in Australia is killing the gold-plated energy networks, and they are squealing like stuck pigs. Not enough profit, despite the best attempts of governments to prop them up.

With a reported half of Australia's power coming from renewable sources just over a month ago, that indeed is no mean feat. Meanwhile, oil and gas exploration offshore West Australia, which sensibly hasn't placed all it's eggs in the renewable basket, is increasing for which I, for one, am truly grateful.

 

13 hours ago, Lacessit said:

I dare say in my working career I contributed far more to advancing knowledge than you have.  ...

Allegedly. But apparently there's a sizeable amount of methane going about where the source is unaccounted for. Now you've given us a clue.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, NanLaew said:

In your lifetime you mean?

WE shouldn't get too stressed about it all. We might go back to riding horses and eating seaweed to save the planet, only to have a decent sized asteroid kill us all. Nowhere is it said that life is fair.

Posted
6 hours ago, stevenl said:

Lol, you really think 19th century readings are more reliable than today's.

That says more than enough.

One of the problems is that many measurement devices originally located in wide open spaces are now affected by the heat from urban developments such as housing, airports, car parks etc. 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Krataiboy said:

One of the problems is that many measurement devices originally located in wide open spaces are now affected by the heat from urban developments such as housing, airports, car parks etc. 

 

 

this video explains it better then what can be done in text alone,

and also goes into the issue of normalizing data

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFPRMV2p5cY

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
10 hours ago, brokenbone said:

two decimal thermometer improvement does not negate urban asphalt surrounding impact

You seem to be confusing the concepts of precision, accuracy, and calibration, not to mention statistical principles.

Convince me a thermometer manufactured prior to 1906 will be more precise and accurate, and calibrated to show the true temperature, as one manufactured today. Or that the quantity and distribution  of readings was more comprehensive in that time.

I will be interested to witness someone trying to prove a negative.

https://www.theage.com.au/environment/weather/like-a-furnace-massive-heatwave-could-roast-australian-records-20191213-p53jps.html

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

You seem to be confusing the concepts of precision, accuracy, and calibration, not to mention statistical principles.

Convince me a thermometer manufactured prior to 1906 will be more precise and accurate, and calibrated to show the true temperature, as one manufactured today. Or that the quantity and distribution  of readings was more comprehensive in that time.

I will be interested to witness someone trying to prove a negative.

https://www.theage.com.au/environment/weather/like-a-furnace-massive-heatwave-could-roast-australian-records-20191213-p53jps.html

Yes, incredible that TVF members are now claiming temperature measurements in the 19th century were more accurate than they are now.

Posted
17 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Yes, incredible that TVF members are now claiming temperature measurements in the 19th century were more accurate than they are now.

Maybe that's because they are still living there.

Posted
2 hours ago, brokenbone said:

this video explains it better then what can be done in text alone,

and also goes into the issue of normalizing data

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFPRMV2p5cY

 

Thanks for that. I like the way Heller routinely hoists climate change alarmists on the petard of official data, which is all too often manipulated to fit the apocalyptic narrative. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, RickBradford said:

It's very noteworthy that Greta was told to "denounce creative PR" when the whole manufacturing of Greta, and parading her around with world leaders, is almost certainly the most egregious piece of creative PR to come out of the whole climate debate.

 

Her handlers took a schoolgirl, and a troubled one at that, who knows nothing about climate science or the political and economic realities of today's world, and tried to position her as a world savior. It doesn't get any more creative than that.

 

But that's the Green/Left all over. Always accuse the other side of what you are guilty of yourself.

How do you know that, or are these the usual inferences made when attacking a messenger? How do you know she knows nothing  about climate science?

The usual cheap shot of "troubled" when Aspergers are nothing of the sort, simply different. They have a lot of positive traits which you could do well to emulate.

So what are your solutions, or do you just want to take potshots from the sidelines?

But that's the right wing for you, business as usual. About 50 odd billionaires have as much wealth as the bottom 50% of the world population, and we wouldn't want to upset that applecart.

Posted
6 hours ago, Lacessit said:

You seem to be confusing the concepts of precision, accuracy, and calibration, not to mention statistical principles.

Convince me a thermometer manufactured prior to 1906 will be more precise and accurate, and calibrated to show the true temperature, as one manufactured today. Or that the quantity and distribution  of readings was more comprehensive in that time.

I will be interested to witness someone trying to prove a negative.

https://www.theage.com.au/environment/weather/like-a-furnace-massive-heatwave-could-roast-australian-records-20191213-p53jps.html

 

 

 

Posted

I am happy that the Thunberg rich teen is back at home. She certainly got herself her 15 minutes plus of fame.  I do hope that she fades back into being a teen who is going to school for her very valuable education. Must be nice to have rich parents, sort of like Justin

Trudeau of Canada, and see where he ended up. Hey maybe she will go into politics in a few years.  555. Yup the new voice of the future, just what we need. Sure glad that someone without much of life's experience is talking to the world and giving us her knowledge, one from someone who does not have worries of her fortunes,  She has the ability via her rich parents, to buy a house, car and some things that other people cannot afford. She also has not lost a job, etc, so yes she does not have many experiences. Of course she got to sail around the world, whoopie.

Geezer

  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/12/2019 at 10:19 PM, Lacessit said:

A morningstar is a medieval weapon similar to a mace, used as a flail. Much like the experience I am getting on this thread.

Meantime, don't buy  any real estate in Bangkok. A city only 1 metre above sea level doesn't strike me as a good long-term investment. Bet the financial advisers are not saying that.

meanwhile in the Maldives the Arabs have just  long  term leased some of the islands for 100 years was it? now wasnt that the same Maldives the rulers were going to  move everyone off as they would all be underwater or so they told  us https://maldivesfinest.com/saudi-arabia-to-invest-10bn

Posted
6 hours ago, brokenbone said:

 

Excellent video.

 

Consider the massive distortion of facts, the degree of twisted logic used, the psychological tactics employed, the enormous corruption, and the immense flows of unaccountable money which exists in the field of politics.  And then imagine that none of that exists within the field of climate change.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...