Jump to content

Trump poised this week to become third U.S. president impeached


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, J Town said:

Too many people don't understand, once he's impeached, that part is over. Finished. Full stop. Impeached forever in history. What is Bill Clinton most remembered for? The oral impeachment. Trump will be remember for the Ukraine phone call impeachment. The defining moment of his legacy.

bill made millions dollars in bribes, sorry, 100.000$ speeches for an hour by big business

 

his wife only had to give some return to the investors

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no earthly power can justly call me in question as a delinquent ... no learned lawyer will affirm that an impeachment can lie against the King. 

 

Sounds like DOJ spin, doesn’t it?... but no, that’s King Charles in 1649.... life is circular... history hopefully repeats, but I doubt it, given that some “jurors” have already started announcing their biased finding before the trial.... so in my view, it’s the senate on trial, not the king.

Edited by jany123
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mick501 said:

In a nutshell, Dems have been in high octane tantrum mode since their ineptitude snatched election defeat from the jaws of victory.  Impeachment in this instance is an extension of the "never trump" tantrum.  But we really really really don't like him.  Really really.

 

Of course, it will fail in the senate, and history will record it as another ineffectual Dems tanty.   A political stunt and nothing more.  Certain to backfire at the next election as it highlights that even when the entire Democratic Party sets its mind to a goal, they can not achieve it.

Certain to backfire huh? Interesting. How do you know that? Answer -- there is no way for anyone to really know the political consequences of the historic events happening now. Bluster from either side is just empty. But we do have an interesting fact. About 50 percent of the American public supports both impeachment and removal of the current president. That is evidence of some really real REALNESS underlying the effort to give consequences to a president that has CLEARLY violated his oath of office to uphold the constitution. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Certain to backfire huh? Interesting. How do you know that? Answer -- there is no way for anyone to really know the political consequences of the historic events happening now. Bluster from either side is just empty. But we do have an interesting fact. About 50 percent of the American public supports both impeachment and removal of the current president. That is evidence of some really real REALNESS underlying the effort to give consequences to a president that has CLEARLY violated his oath of office to uphold the constitution. 

Any investigation can be tailored to present the facts you want and achieve any goal you like.  In this case there has been a concerted effort by the prosecutor over many years.  Hardly impartial, and denied by President Trump.  

 

You are right, the outcome can not be known with certainty.  But when you hold the balance of power and a 2/3 majority needed, that seems like pissing in the wind, even if the facts were definitively known.  If Pelosi refers it, that puts President Trump back in the drivers seat and becomes his chance to author the investigation.

 

happy to take a bet with you on this.  I'll wave to you as you run naked down Sukhumvit.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mick501 said:

In a nutshell, Dems have been in high octane tantrum mode since their ineptitude snatched election defeat from the jaws of victory.  Impeachment in this instance is an extension of the "never trump" tantrum.  But we really really really don't like him.  Really really.

 

Of course, it will fail in the senate, and history will record it as another ineffectual Dems tanty.   A political stunt and nothing more.  Certain to backfire at the next election as it highlights that even when the entire Democratic Party sets its mind to a goal, they can not achieve it.

You just stating the obvious. If the Dems don’t go into high octane after their lost, they failed to represent the majority who voted for them. Don’t you think it’s a tad obvious they don’t like him? There are those who called him a kook, crazy and not fit to lead. Oh, that was Lindsey, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, justin case said:

bill made millions dollars in bribes, sorry, 100.000$ speeches for an hour by big business

 

his wife only had to give some return to the investors

 

He was an amateur.... chump change... selling ambassadorships for a million, that’s were it’s at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mick501 said:

Any investigation can be tailored to present the facts you want and achieve any goal you like.  In this case there has been a concerted effort by the prosecutor over many years.  Hardly impartial, and denied by President Trump.  

 

You are right, the outcome can not be known with certainty.  But when you hold the balance of power and a 2/3 majority needed, that seems like pissing in the wind, even if the facts were definitively known.  If Pelosi refers it, that puts President Trump back in the drivers seat and becomes his chance to author the investigation.

 

happy to take a bet with you on this.  I'll wave to you as you run naked down Sukhumvit.

Oh geez! 

You're talking about an entirely different thing! 

Not cool. 

Obviously the senate won't remove him if Pelosi sends the impeachment to trial. 

The comment was about the POLITICAL consequences going forward as in the 2020 election for the presidency, house, senate, etc. 

Please don't bother proposing bets to me about that either. Nobody knows. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dumbastheycome said:

I find it strange that so many persist in comparisons of the impeachment of Clinton with  that of this current attempt on Trump.

Clinton demeaned  himself by creating hypocritical outrage over a an issue that hardly questioned the national security of the USA.

Why avoid the comparison  with Nixon who only evaded impeachment and inevitable Senate conviction by doing a runner ?

The  base issues  for Trump absolutely call into question issues  of national  concern but the investigation of  has been thwarted by refusals to comply with legitimate legal process. Trump has put himself above the law in defiance of the  Constitution.

What legitimate legal process is that,abusing subpoenas! The framers envision the executive branch and the congress to have disagreements . They created a third branch to settle those ! Please pay attention ! That's  constitutional!

Edited by riclag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

You just stating the obvious. If the Dems don’t go into high octane after their lost, they failed to represent the majority who voted for them. Don’t you think it’s a tad obvious they don’t like him? There are those who called him a kook, crazy and not fit to lead. Oh, that was Lindsey, 

Sore loser much?  You should read up on how the voting system works.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mick501 said:

Sore loser much?  You should read up on how the voting system works.

I do marvel why the greatest democracy in the world have an indirect voting system as against direct voting system of popular votes like most countries in the world. Just rhetorical.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, riclag said:

What legitimate legal process is that,abusing subpoenas! The framers envision the executive branch and the congress to have disagreements . They created a third branch to settle those ! Please pay attention ! That's  constitutional!

Where is evidence of abuse? Congress is empowered  to issue subpoenas to attain access to tangible evidence either  by witness or documents. Disagreement between Congress and the Executive Branch of the White House (assuming that is the executive  branch  you refer to) would  infer a process of debate as to  good  cause in  due process.

What has been observed is a simple block and denial as  Contempt  of Congress.

Is that constitutional?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

Sure thing mate.

Hahahahaha indeed!

51 percent favor impeachment AND removal.

FOX.

 

https://news.yahoo.com/new-fox-news-poll-on-impeachment-contradicts-the-view-of-its-most-loyal-viewer-president-trump-165743309.html

 

Quote

New Fox News poll on impeachment contradicts its most loyal viewer — President Trump

 


.

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

Y’all cheerfully point out that the trump will persist in fighting court decisions right up to the Supreme Court.... but if the dems wish to continue pursuing an obstructed investigation, y’all cry like babies. Hypocrite much?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...