Jump to content

Who is legally at fault here?


Mike West

Recommended Posts

If a person riding a scooter (with a full Thai bike licence) hits a woman crossing the road, at a non zebra crossing, no traffic lights, and she crossed without looking at the last second and gets hit.
Who is legally at fault? I am getting mixed answers from different people. thank you 

Edited by Mike West
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the motorist are always at fault world wide,

on rare occasions it can be deemed a fluke of tuff luck,

but the motorist is between a rock and a hard place in any court.

i always get an extra insurance covering 3rd party in case i bump into a $1 million mercedes or pedestrian

 

Edited by brokenbone
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, 4MyEgo said:

If you are a farang and you hit her, you are up for it, sorry to say, no, I'm not joking, their system works like this, who has more money has to pay for damages.

 

Forget about legal here, just try and come to an arrangement and move forward, i.e. pay for her hospital costs at least and give her a wai, maybe 1,000 baht in her pocket too.

 

Just saying....you did ask, and that is my opinion, maybe backed up by some others ?

I just don't agree with the "who has more money has to pay for damages." why? this way they will never learn or get penalized. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mike West said:

I just don't agree with the "who has more money has to pay for damages." why? this way they will never learn or get penalized. 

When you say penalised, you mean a fine of 400 baht, or 200 baht cash in the cops pocket, if school kids on a bike with no helmet, push ups on the road side, a wai and then on they go to school, on the bike with no helmet. Unregistered/unlicensed drivers paying their fine and allowed to move forward with the same vehicle they were stopped with.

 

No point penalty system yet, no licenses, no registration, no insurances, welcome to Thailand, it is what it is, it is what it has been and it will be what it will be in the future, just duck and weave to survive, don't try to change it, your just a crazy farang in their eyes, and if you don't like it here then go back, regardless if you have a better alternative or point. 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Don Mega said:

But you are categorically wrong. so believe what you want but you should not post false information.

Are you still going on about this.

 

Perhaps the poster can give us a further update when the matter is sorted, i.e. after his insurer refuses to pay, or pay above xyz and then he has to dip into his own pocket.

 

Please get a grip on reality, I might be wrong in your mind, but it's my dribble oi.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Orton Rd said:

Learned this year that the law is often irrelevant here when it comes to who carries the blame in a traffic accident

Ive learnt on numerous occasions over the years it works exactly the way it does back home in Aus.

Rather amusing to see the at fault person told to go sling it by the police when they try it on and stooge the farang  "cause he has big money".

 

In saying that i did admit fault to one accident when it was clear the elderly lady that ran into me had no means to cover damage or hospital bills.... I instigated that, she was not trying to stooge me.

Edited by Don Mega
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mike West said:

only the normal accident/medical insurance which covered her up 30,000 baht in treatment. 

And herein lies the problem.

With First Class you would hand all this to the insurance company.

They would negotiate with the police, the injured party, they know how things work here.

Many Many Many threads I have read over the years ... situation the same as yours.

Would you be satisfied with the piddly amount of insurance offered here back where you come from ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/22/2019 at 9:40 AM, Mike West said:

If a person riding a scooter (with a full Thai bike licence) hits a woman crossing the road, at a non zebra crossing, no traffic lights, and she crossed without looking at the last second and gets hit.
Who is legally at fault? I am getting mixed answers from different people. thank you 

if all the above is true, then the pedestrian is at fault.

 

as the thai motor vehicle regulations generally follow those of western countries, legally you should be blameless.  additionally, you should be entitled to sue for any damages to your scooter caused by the pedestrians actions.

 

this is assuming you were following all traffic laws.......safe speed, correct side of road, not texting, etc.

 

how that plays out in a thai police station or courthouse is another matter entirely.......

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, canthai55 said:

And herein lies the problem.

With First Class you would hand all this to the insurance company.

They would negotiate with the police, the injured party, they know how things work here.

Many Many Many threads I have read over the years ... situation the same as yours.

Would you be satisfied with the piddly amount of insurance offered here back where you come from ?

And also another problem try getting 1st class ins on some scooters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a general rule on ThaiVisa or, indeed, any forum, you should ignore anything said by a poster who, in later posts, reveals himself to be unhinged.

Unless you have have your own footage of an accident, which indisputably demonstrates the other party's fault, as a farang hitting a Thai you are unquestionably at a disadvantage.

You might be lucky in having a fair-minded police man attend, or witnesses willing to attest your innocence, or the other party being mature enough to accept responsibility for their own mistake.

Bear in mind, however, that many Thais will perceive as "fair" an outcome in which the farang, who can obviously afford it, covers any costs. That can be enough for the cop to assign more credibility to the other party's version of events, or for witnesses to decide not to get involved, or for the other party to omit certain details.

That is a reality of living in Thailand as a foreigner. Some people may have had different personal experiences, but that does not alter the greater reality.

 

Edited by donnacha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Don Mega said:

Just checked my insurance company (roojai), are they wrong or is the por ror bor insurance  for scooters different ?

 

81256953_10157340609102740_7540494100982

 

https://www.roojai.com/en/car-insurance/compulsory/

CTPL is all the same for m/c, wave type & scoots and if you can get voluntary 1st for 2 wheels you're lucky. 

OP hasn't told the extent of ladies injuries so the outcome is usually resolved by discussion and this can work out better for both sides falangie or no falangie.

 

Kids, adults, old people, bicycles, scoots small & waves, big scoots & big bikes, small cars, big car, pick up truck, lorries & truck a law unto themselves. That's how I see the order of things judged upon.  ????

 

Sometimes its considered fair sometimes not,  as said one of those things to avoid if at all possible in Thailand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.






×
×
  • Create New...