Jump to content

Survey: More than half of all Thais can't survive losing their jobs more than 6 months


Recommended Posts

Posted

Survey: More than half of all Thais can't survive losing their jobs more than 6 months

 

10pm.jpg

Thai caption: Lose job - Hurt - No savings

 

A survey by the comparison site GoBear suggests that more than half of all Thais - 56% - don't have enough savings to survive losing their jobs for more than 6 months. 

 

People were asked how long they could survive. 

 

Six per cent were not sure.

 

Six said they didn't have enough to survive even a week. 

 

Nine could last a month or less. 

 

Eighteen had enough money for 1-3 months. 

 

Seventeen had enough for 3 to six months. 

 

In total 56% would be destitute within 6 months.

 

Source: Sanook

 

 
thai+visa_news.jpg
-- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2019-12-23

 

Posted

I believe it's the same EVERYWHERE in reality. I'd bet most people in my home country would be hard pressed to come up with an AU$30k bank balance. Superannuation would likely cover it for most, but actual savings are very hard to accumulate.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Senechal said:

This is not only people in Thailand, it's most middle class people in the US and Europe.

That's because they live on credit...

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Senechal said:

This is not only people in Thailand, it's most middle class people in the US and Europe.

Can you please post a link to the stats you based that statement on?

 

Thanks in advance.

  • Like 1
Posted

I thought it was reported on TVF earlier this week that 63% of Thais had less than 500bht in bank savings.. Have could that last for 6 mths being unemployed?? 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Metapod said:

If you can't survive for 6 months, you need to start lowering your living expenses now and start saving more.

 

So many people live paycheck to paycheck in BKK, it is crazy

Its hard to lower when ones getting paid 300baht per day. ????

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, RasiMike said:

I believe it's the same EVERYWHERE in reality. I'd bet most people in my home country would be hard pressed to come up with an AU$30k bank balance. Superannuation would likely cover it for most, but actual savings are very hard to accumulate.

You cannot  automatically access superannuation funds when unemployed, strict criteria exists for accessing super prior to age 55 

 

Posted
33 minutes ago, shady86 said:

No worries, pawn your iphones, cars designer clothes.

Designer clothes from local market??

Cars, under finance

Iphones worth nothing secondhand

  • Like 1
Posted

There was study done in UK, USA and Australia a few years ago, and it revealed 70% (I think was the figure) were less than 3 pay checks away from homelessness.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Yadon Toploy said:

Can you please post a link to the stats you based that statement on?

 

Thanks in advance.

Google..try it. First result.  https://www.threethriftyguys.com/2014/01/how-long-could-you-live-without-a-paycheck/

 

Back in 2012 Huffington Post reported that two thirds of American households are living paycheck-to-paycheck. Quoting the results of a survey from the American Payroll Association, they reported that 68% of households would find it “somewhat difficult or very difficult if their paychecks were delayed for a week”.

 

Europe: Compared to US citizens, Europeans are apparently in worse shape.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/americans-are-bad-at-saving-money-but-europeans-are-much-worse-2017-01-26

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...