11 hours ago, canuckamuck said:

Talk to Twitter and Facebook about all the accounts they have shut down for having the wrong opinions.

Off you go again with your misguided idea that private businesses owe you the right to say what you wish on their platform.

11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Off you go again with your misguided idea that private businesses owe you the right to say what you wish on their platform.

I am confident that if the situation was reversed we would have Antifa style riots by now.

9 hours ago, rabas said:

Google "does hating affect your health?" and come back in a few years after you finish reading. 219,000,000 hits. And that is just your physical health.

 

But the people you hate don't feel a thing. 

I didnt say i hate them. I dont give a toss about them.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What’s the problem with seeing and calling out fools, haters, racists, misogynists, xenophobic, homophobic and cultists?

There is no problem with calling out the occasional wrongdoer, though the simplistic name calling is a bit silly because human behaviour is vastly more complex.

 

The problem is blindly labelling vast unseen swaths of society with these silly labels often along political boundaries. All but the truly blind know this is a ploy used through the ages to teach hate and gain political power or votes.

 

1 hour ago, mogandave said:

Someone that doesn’t “give a toss” about them claims they deserve to be punished. 
 

 

What punishment?

 

Saying people who believe in a fairy tale are stupid is not punishment.

4 hours ago, rabas said:

There is no problem with calling out the occasional wrongdoer, though the simplistic name calling is a bit silly because human behaviour is vastly more complex.

 

The problem is blindly labelling vast unseen swaths of society with these silly labels often along political boundaries. All but the truly blind know this is a ploy used through the ages to teach hate and gain political power or votes.

 

You mean just like what Trump's doing?

 

PS. That was just too easy, but thanks for the Christmas present!

 .... Jerry Falwell, Jr. tweeted his criticism of Christianity Today for its editorial calling for President Donald Trump’s removal from office, asserting the publication has revealed itself as the same “liberal evangelicals” who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 ...

Some troll posts have been removed. 

1 hour ago, Catoholic said:

 .... Jerry Falwell, Jr. tweeted his criticism of Christianity Today for its editorial calling for President Donald Trump’s removal from office, asserting the publication has revealed itself as the same “liberal evangelicals” who voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 ...

And?

Trump is no fine Christian by any standard. but why is no one calling out Nancy for abandoning the tenets of her faith while still pretending to be a Catholic!? 

 

 

19 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Trump is no fine Christian by any standard. but why is no one calling out Nancy for abandoning the tenets of her faith while still pretending to be a Catholic!? 

 

 

One can be a religion but not religious. Unlike trump who says he is to use it to his advantage.

Troll posts removed.  

 

9 hours ago, Sujo said:

One can be a religion but not religious. Unlike trump who says he is to use it to his advantage.

"One can be a religion"..... a religion with one follower? Ok, great.

 

"Unlike trump who says he is to use it to his advantage."...… Where did he say that? All politicians play up the "religion" THING when it's time for the vote. As an example, you never see a white Presidential candidate attending a predominately black church UNTIL they are running for office and stop by on a Sunday to take to the pulpit(with a camera crew in tow) to talk about things that will make the black community think they are "one of them" so to speak. 

 

If they were really all that interested in the black community they'd stop by for services on occasion rather than once every 4 years to try to gain their votes. It's true of all politicians.

Edited December 27, 20196 yr by HuskerDo

On ‎12‎/‎25‎/‎2019 at 7:44 AM, canuckamuck said:

The current line up of Democrat candidates are straight out of a dystopian novel. People who have not yet had their morality and common sense dissolved by the constant degradation of a formerly great culture, based on morality and founded on Godly principles, will obviously vote for any alternative to the slobbering hell beasts. Trump is not them, vote Trump.

 

Think trump will lose a couple of voters because of the "great things" (sarcasm) he has achieved:

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/in-trump-country-a-season-of-need-on-family-farms/ar-BBYmQwq?ocid=spartandhp

23 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

Think trump will lose a couple of voters because of the "great things" (sarcasm) he has achieved:

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/in-trump-country-a-season-of-need-on-family-farms/ar-BBYmQwq?ocid=spartandhp

Just getting rid of the revolting Pacific treaty thing earned him my vote. Opting out of Paris accord got him a second vote from me. Unfortunately I can't vote in the US.

1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Unfortunately I can't vote in the US.

There IS a God

14 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Just getting rid of the revolting Pacific treaty thing earned him my vote. Opting out of Paris accord got him a second vote from me. Unfortunately I can't vote in the US.

And how many judges? 
 

 

25 minutes ago, ThaiBunny said:

There IS a God

When Trump wins next year I might revise my opinion that God does not interfere in the business of mankind. IMO God has sent Biden to make sure Trump wins.

Just now, thaibeachlovers said:

When Trump wins next year I might revise my opinion that God does not interfere in the business of mankind. IMO God has sent Biden to make sure Trump wins.

And you to tell as.

10 minutes ago, sirineou said:

And you to tell as.

"as"?

On 12/24/2019 at 8:49 PM, soalbundy said:

what's to dislike about liberal people, look up the word in the dictionary, it's the same as tolerance, something I'm sure that Jesus would agree with. Communist doctrine:- 'From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs' not a bad basis for a society but like christianity it has never been put into practice, even the Soviet socialist republic never pretended to be communist and they weren't even socialist, it was just a dictatorship, the West has a sort of democracy but it's real basis is dictatorship from capital.

 

On 12/24/2019 at 8:50 PM, thaibeachlovers said:

Except for the first sentence, I agree.

I don't think you looked it up.

 

Doesn't this definition look a lot like tolerance?

Wiki says:

Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), capitalism (free markets), democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion.

Jimmy and Tammy are next on the .... trump train.

21 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

 

I don't think you looked it up.

 

Doesn't this definition look a lot like tolerance?

Wiki says:

Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), capitalism (free markets), democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion.

Liberal has been co opted by the left, in the same way as "gay" was co opted by homosexuals and no longer means what it originally did.

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Liberal has been co opted by the left, in the same way as "gay" was co opted by homosexuals and no longer means what it originally did.

No, in the US liberal has been co opted by the right as an insult for the left. In other countries 'liberal' still has the traditional meaning. Don't know about all countries though, how about NZ e.g.?

36 minutes ago, stevenl said:

No, in the US liberal has been co opted by the right as an insult for the left. In other countries 'liberal' still has the traditional meaning. Don't know about all countries though, how about NZ e.g.?

I guess in several other countries (I.e in Europe), what is called a liberal political platform in the US would be called moderate right wing, and what is called leftist or even socialist would be called liberal or social democrat.

42 minutes ago, stevenl said:

No, in the US liberal has been co opted by the right as an insult for the left. In other countries 'liberal' still has the traditional meaning. Don't know about all countries though, how about NZ e.g.?

The only reason it is sometimes used as an insult by the right is because so many people confuse liberalism with leftism. 
 

Traditional liberals have much more in common with conservatives in the US than leftists. 

On 12/25/2019 at 7:49 AM, Boon Mee said:

Christianity Today - the outfit that made excuses for / supported Joseph Stalin's reign of terror? 

 

Enough said... 

Lmao... enough said? Not really enough said at all... you made a statement that lacks any links, and is deceptive, if not an outright lie.

 

Did you even read Breitbarts article about a CT editor lionizing a man who failed to condemn Communism as much as nazism?

 

lol... breitbart... what was it you said... oh yeah “enough said”

49 minutes ago, mogandave said:

The only reason it is sometimes used as an insult by the right is because so many people confuse liberalism with leftism. 
 

Traditional liberals have much more in common with conservatives in the US than leftists. 

Are you herein suggesting that republicans are stupid as they cannot discern left from liberal.... after all, these insults are meant for republican consumption, to further divide... or should I say; to further polarize their base?

18 minutes ago, jany123 said:

Are you herein suggesting that republicans are stupid as they cannot discern left from liberal.... after all, these insults are meant for republican consumption, to further divide... or should I say; to further polarize their base?

Herein? 

11 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Herein? 

Yes... herein (as applied in response to your post)