rooster59 Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 Victoria Secret human trafficking case: Court orders assets seized but owner remains at large Image: Naewna Thai media has reported that the Civil Court in Bangkok has ordered the seizure of 467 million baht in assets from 15 people in connection with the Victoria Secret massage parlor. The parlor in Bangkok was raided in January of last year for offering underage girls from Laos, Myanmar and Thailand for sex. Owner Kampol Wirathesuporn remains at large but manager Satthatham Chaengchai was earlier sentenced to a prison term of 18 years plus 16 months, a sentence he is appealing. Prayut Phetkhun, a deputy at the office of the attorney general said that the court had ordered assets totalling 467 million to be seized. Only 225 million of this will find its way into the hands of the state with the rest going to pay debts to two securities firms. The owner and manager of the parlor are two of the people who have had assets seized. A warrant is out for the arrest of owner Kampol; there is a 20 year statute of limitations on the case. Source: Naewna -- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2019-12-28 Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bluesofa Posted December 28, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 28, 2019 1 hour ago, rooster59 said: Victoria Secret human trafficking case: Court orders assets seized but owner remains at large He shouldn't be too difficult to track down, rather than someone who is small or medium. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezzra Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 15 minutes ago, bluesofa said: He shouldn't be too difficult to track down, rather than someone who is small or medium. I think you bonmed on your attempt to joke here as the term 'remains at large' is the correct use of the english language to describe someone in the wind... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesofa Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 23 minutes ago, ezzra said: 40 minutes ago, bluesofa said: He shouldn't be too difficult to track down, rather than someone who is small or medium. I think you bonmed on your attempt to joke here as the term 'remains at large' is the correct use of the english language to describe someone in the wind... Thanks. I never realised that. 'someone in the wind' - might that be Johnny Fartpants perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proboscis Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 I suppose that no one is chasing them for flagrant breach of the trade mark/copyright law! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klauskunkel Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 manager Satthatham Chaengchai was earlier sentenced to a prison term of 18 years plus 16 months, a sentence he is appealing: "It's too long. I want a micro-sentence!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post mwbrown Posted December 28, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 28, 2019 4 hours ago, ezzra said: I think you bonmed on your attempt to joke here as the term 'remains at large' is the correct use of the english language to describe someone in the wind... Did you hear about the midget ghost whisperer who broke out of prison? He's a small medium at large. 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deli Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 Must have <deleted> off someone wearing a lot of stripes and tinsel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sydebolle Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 It can be safely assumed, that those "at large" will stay "at large". You do not run such a business without having all the key people "in check" and on the "payroll". Hence those "at large" will ensure staying "at large". Who do you want to fool - would be my question if anyone would ask ???? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcatcher Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 6 hours ago, ezzra said: I think you bonmed on your attempt to joke here as the term 'remains at large' is the correct use of the english language to describe someone in the wind... Ezzra, glasshouses and stones? Did you mean "I think you bombed on your attempt...."? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotchilli Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 9 hours ago, rooster59 said: Owner Kampol Wirathesuporn remains at large One wonders how.... LOL 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubon farang Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 The owner will never be caught. Lets just say he has friends in high places mmmmmm Like red bull guy Manager took the fall the owner will be most grateful and the cops save face All Happy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prairieboy Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 On 12/28/2019 at 9:00 AM, rooster59 said: Owner Kampol Wirathesuporn remains at large He probably changed his name and is hiding out in parliament! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammieuk1 Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 (edited) Prayut Phetkhun, a deputy at the office of the attorney general said that the court had ordered assets totaling 467 million to be seized. Only 225 million of this will find its way into the hands of the state with the rest going to pay debts to two securities firms. Or sweet <deleted> after special sticky hand deductions???? Edited December 30, 2019 by metisdead Profane acronym removed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChipButty Posted December 30, 2019 Share Posted December 30, 2019 1 hour ago, sammieuk1 said: Only 225 million of this will find its way into the hands of the state with the rest going to pay debts to two securities firms. Or sweet <deleted> after special sticky hand deductions???? Why not build a few schools or something the poor people would benefit from, or is that to much to ask? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now