Jump to content

Victoria Secret human trafficking case: Court orders assets seized but owner remains at large


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Victoria Secret human trafficking case: Court orders assets seized but owner remains at large

 

462934.jpg

Image: Naewna

 

Thai media has reported that the Civil Court in Bangkok has ordered the seizure of 467 million baht in assets from 15 people in connection with the Victoria Secret massage parlor. 

 

The parlor in Bangkok was raided in January of last year for offering underage girls from Laos, Myanmar and Thailand for sex. 

 

Owner Kampol Wirathesuporn remains at large but manager Satthatham Chaengchai was earlier sentenced to a prison term of 18 years plus 16 months, a sentence he is appealing.

 

Prayut Phetkhun, a deputy at the office of the attorney general said that the court had ordered assets totalling 467 million to be seized. 

 

Only 225 million of this will find its way into the hands of the state with the rest going to pay debts to two securities firms. 

 

The owner and manager of the parlor are two of the people who have had assets seized. 

 

A warrant is out for the arrest of owner Kampol; there is a 20 year statute of limitations on the case.

 

Source: Naewna

 

thai+visa_news.jpg

-- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2019-12-28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, bluesofa said:

He shouldn't be too difficult to track down, rather than someone who is small or medium.

I think you bonmed on your attempt to joke here as the term 'remains at large' is the correct use of the english language to describe someone in the wind...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ezzra said:
40 minutes ago, bluesofa said:

He shouldn't be too difficult to track down, rather than someone who is small or medium.

I think you bonmed on your attempt to joke here as the term 'remains at large' is the correct use of the english language to describe someone in the wind...

Thanks. I never realised that.

'someone in the wind' - might that be Johnny Fartpants perhaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can be safely assumed, that those "at large" will stay "at large". You do not run such a business without having all the key people "in check" and on the "payroll". Hence those "at large" will ensure staying "at large". 

Who do you want to fool - would be my question if anyone would ask ???? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

6 hours ago, ezzra said:

I think you bonmed on your attempt to joke here as the term 'remains at large' is the correct use of the english language to describe someone in the wind...

Ezzra, glasshouses and stones?    Did you mean   "I think you bombed on your attempt...."?   :thumbsup: 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prayut Phetkhun, a deputy at the office of the attorney general said that the court had ordered assets totaling 467 million to be seized. 

 

Only 225 million of this will find its way into the hands of the state with the rest going to pay debts to two securities firms. 

 

Or sweet <deleted> after special sticky hand deductions????

Edited by metisdead
Profane acronym removed.
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sammieuk1 said:

Only 225 million of this will find its way into the hands of the state with the rest going to pay debts to two securities firms. 

 

Or sweet <deleted> after special sticky hand deductions????

Why not build a few schools or something the poor people would benefit from, or is that to much to ask?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...