Jump to content

Breaking with Republicans, Romney votes 'guilty' in Trump impeachment trial


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

Oh I don't know. Rachel Maddow released portions of Trump's taxes. It was a massive flop. Frankly, most of what I've seen Democrats think they'll find indicates they don't even understand tax returns and what is and isn't on them.

If there was nothing there Trump would have been waving them around like a clean pair of underwear.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Crazy Alex said:

What has been covered up?

isn't that the same innocent question asked by Trump supporters over the little matter of the Ukraine impeachable offences?

  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, Crazy Alex said:

Not really. He's been masterfully baiting (pun intended) Democrats for years. It's the same old trap every time. Trump sets the bait. Democrats take it. Trump reels them in. Democrats fight violently and make a big deal. The original issue fizzles out. Democrats look like idiots making much ado about nothing.

Nothing there: ????

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Ricohoc said:

Oh my!  Romney's press secretary from 2012 ripped into him pretty good.

 

Rick Gorka:

"I believe Mitt Romney is motivated by bitterness and jealously . . ."

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/481705-former-romney-campaign-spokesman-says-impeachment-decision-is-motivated-by

A very bitter and vindictive sod,a true has been and never was been!  Mr. Trump proved this swamp creature,Washington politician wrong! Be interesting to see how he votes for bills coming up!

 

 

Edited by riclag
  • Like 2
Posted
On 2/8/2020 at 1:54 AM, Crazy Alex said:

In the House? Yep. I agree. Fortunately, the Senate proceedings were just as fair as those in the House.

The house had witnesses. How many witnesses in the senate trial.

  • Haha 1
Posted
20 hours ago, riclag said:

A very bitter and vindictive sod,a true has been and never was been!  Mr. Trump proved this swamp creature,Washington politician wrong! Be interesting to see how he votes for bills coming up!

 

 

Well there are about 300 bills waiting on mitchs desk that havent been dealt with. Could try that for a start.

  • Confused 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Sujo said:

The house had witnesses. How many witnesses in the senate trial.

Don't you get tired of churning out the same old troll information? the House did not allow Trump a proper defence as they did Clinton and Dems pulled in 18 'witnesses' not one of which said they had seen him do anything wrong. Give it a REST you lost.

  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, BobBKK said:

Don't you get tired of churning out the same old troll information? the House did not allow Trump a proper defence as they did Clinton and Dems pulled in 18 'witnesses' not one of which said they had seen him do anything wrong. Give it a REST you lost.

The house is an investigation, not a trial.

 

Clinton did not get investigated by the house, they only voted. Starr did the investigation.

 

There is evidence. Even repubs are saying he did wrong but not worthy of removal.

 

Trump could call witnesses, he just refused to call them, the ones with direct knowledge of his perfect call.

 

We all know why.

 

Interesting you dont like facts.

Edited by Sujo
  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, Sujo said:

The house is an investigation, not a trial.

 

Clinton did not get investigated by the house, they only voted. Starr did the investigation.

 

There is evidence. Even repubs are saying he did wrong but not worthy of removal.

 

Trump could call witnesses, he just refused to call them, the ones with direct knowledge of his perfect call.

 

We all know why.

 

Interesting you dont like facts.

 

The investigation led to dismissal. That's how it works.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Well there are about 300 bills waiting on mitchs desk that havent been dealt with. Could try that for a start.

 

Let the house put through meaningful legislation. We can rename libraries and streets later. Let the house introduce an infrastructure bill. Otherwise McConnell is correct the senate should use the time they have and prioritize confirming judges.

Edited by Cryingdick
  • Like 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, rabas said:

Mueller investigated Trump, for years. Nothing. So the house investigated on their own. Nothing. And you complain about him being acquitted?


Yes, but remember, the only reason they did not find anything is because Trump‘s obstruction. 
 

Keep in mind, there is never any accountability on the left, they just move to the next hysteria. 
 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, mogandave said:


Seventeen witnesses in the Senate trial. 
 

I missed them giving evidence in the trial.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, BobBKK said:

Don't you get tired of churning out the same old troll information? the House did not allow Trump a proper defence as they did Clinton and Dems pulled in 18 'witnesses' not one of which said they had seen him do anything wrong. Give it a REST you lost.

America lost. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

 

Let the house put through meaningful legislation. We can rename libraries and streets later. Let the house introduce an infrastructure bill. Otherwise McConnell is correct the senate should use the time they have and prioritize confirming judges.

Many of the bills are bipartisan. Sitting waiting.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...