China's Sinovac starts late stage trials for its COVID-19 vaccine
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
-
Latest posts...
-
126
Report Thailand to Mandate Tax Declarations for All Citizens by 2027
i guess offshore income will now pool in an offshore corp. and one in year in 10 i'll be doing a lot of travelling 😄 -
35
THAILAND LIVE Thailand Live Monday 25 August 2025
Paetongtarn's Fate Hangs on Imminent Court Verdict File photo for reference only As Thailand stands on the brink of a significant political verdict, widespread concerns about possible judicial payoffs are gaining momentum, casting a shadow over the fate of court-suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra. Scheduled for this Friday, the Constitutional Court's decision is anxiously awaited, with the potential to dramatically reshape the political landscape. Full Story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1370919-paetongtarns-fate-hangs-on-imminent-court-verdict/ -
23
-
0
Politics Paetongtarn's Fate Hangs on Imminent Court Verdict
File photo for reference only As Thailand stands on the brink of a significant political verdict, widespread concerns about possible judicial payoffs are gaining momentum, casting a shadow over the fate of court-suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra. Scheduled for this Friday, the Constitutional Court's decision is anxiously awaited, with the potential to dramatically reshape the political landscape. At the heart of the controversy is Paetongtarn Shinawatra, who finds herself embroiled in allegations of misconduct linked to a leaked phone conversation with Cambodian leader Hun Sen. This conversation reportedly revolved around sensitive Thai-Cambodian border disputes. The spectre of payoffs has loomed large, fuelled by fears that secret cash deals might influence the decision-making of the nine-judge panel charged with her judgment. This is not merely speculative paranoia. Paradorn Patanathabut, a former head of the National Security Council, pointed out that such rumours—though potentially part of a wider smear campaign—are deeply rooted in the history of Thai political dealings. In fact, such fears are reminiscent of past incidents, notably in 2008, when Thaksin Shinawatra's former lawyer was apprehended and convicted for attempting to bribe Supreme Court judges with a two million baht payoff. Paetongtarn’s situation mirrors a similar predicament faced by her predecessor, Srettha Thavisin, who was forced from office on similar impeachment grounds, stemming from the appointment of the aforementioned lawyer. It is this backdrop of contentious political history that sharpens the current climate of uncertainty. The imminent court decision has critically split opinion. While some analysts foresee a conviction that would dislodge Paetongtarn from her premiership, others predict a narrow victory, possibly decided by a single vote among the judges. This cautious optimism within her camp is bolstered by her father, Thaksin Shinawatra, an enduring figure in Thai politics, who remains confident in a positive outcome. His unwavering support underscores the tight-knit bond and influential dynamic within the Shinawatra political dynasty. Paradorn expressed doubts about the potential influence of Chatchai Bangchuad, the present National Security Council chief, in aiding Paetongtarn’s cause. This stems from Paetongtarn’s seemingly deferential communication with Hun Sen, as revealed in the leaked audio tape. In their conversation, she reportedly displayed a willingness to yield to demands, raising questions about her allegiance and sparking allegations of conduct akin to treason, perceived to damage both her personal integrity and Thailand’s military prestige. These allegations have only complicated matters between Thailand and Cambodia. The Shinawatra family's historical ties with the Hun family add another layer of complexity to diplomatic relations. Tensions escalated recently, culminating in last month’s border clashes, which saw five gruesome days of conflict result in numerous casualties. The reverberations of these skirmishes have intensified scrutiny on Paetongtarn’s decisions and raised fears about her capacity to protect national interests effectively. Faced with such intense pressure, Paradorn suggested that Paetongtarn might consider resigning ahead of the court's decision, seeing it as a way to mitigate potential political fallout. A guilty verdict could not only strip her of her office but also ban her from political life indefinitely. This precarious scenario paints a perilous picture for Paetongtarn’s political trajectory. Despite these daunting challenges, Paetongtarn has not retreated. Her determination to contest the allegations is fortified by the backing of her influential father. Paetongtarn has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, insisting her discussion with Hun Sen was misconstrued and posed no harm to Thailand’s national interests. As Friday approaches, the political atmosphere in Thailand grows increasingly tense, underscoring the high stakes involved. The political arena remains rife with speculation, as various factions prepare for possible outcomes. What is clear, however, is that the verdict will resonate beyond the courtroom, potentially altering the contours of Thai politics in significant ways. This situation highlights the perennial complexities and challenges of governance within Thailand, where court rulings, political allegiances, and familial dynasties intertwine. The impending decision serves as a critical juncture for Paetongtarn and, by extension, the Shinawatra legacy. It’s a tale of power, influence, and the relentless intrigues of political survival. The situation also offers a poignant reflection on the broader dynamics of Thai-Cambodian relations, underscoring the need for diplomatic finesse and strategic cooperation amidst historical tensions. As regional powers, the actions and decisions of leaders like Paetongtarn carry weighty consequences for both internal stability and regional harmony. With the clock ticking down to the court's judgment, eyes across the nation—and indeed the wider region—are fixed on the Constitutional Court, poised to deliver a verdict that could either stabilise or further complicate Thailand's intricate political framework. As the drama unfolds, one thing remains certain: the ripple effects of this case will be felt for years to come, both in the corridors of power and among the citizenry who watch closely the unfolding narrative of their nation’s politics. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Thai Newsroom 2025-08-25 -
14
How evil is Daniella Weiss?
Have you ever read their racist basic law? The land of Israel is the historical homeland of the Jewish people, in which the State of Israel was established. B. The State of Israel is the national home of the Jewish people, in which it fulfills its natural, cultural, religious, and historical right to self-determination. C. The right to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people. 5 — Ingathering of the Exiles The state will be open for Jewish immigration and the ingathering of exiles. 6 — Connection to the Jewish people A. The state will strive to ensure the safety of the members of the Jewish people and of its citizens in trouble or in captivity due to the fact of their Jewishness or their citizenship. B. The state shall act within the Diaspora to strengthen the affinity between the state and members of the Jewish people. C. The state shall act to preserve the cultural, historical, and religious heritage of the Jewish people among Jews in the Diaspora. 7 — Jewish Settlement A. The state views the development of Jewish settlement as a national value and will act to encourage and promote its establishment and consolidation. THAT you call a democracy?? I repeat, STOLEN ETHNO TERROR STATE!! As it completely disregards the 20% Arabs living in Israel and promotes the violent creation of settlements on Palestinian owned land. -
10
EU Germany's Tough New Bid to Slash Migrant Rights Stirring Fury
Again you show that you don't understand laws. I'll explain it again to you (last time): You can "deport" an illegal migrant only if the recipient will take him/her back. If this is not possible he/she will be your "guest". Got it?
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now