Jump to content

U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs Trump's immunity claim, lets prosecutor get financial records


Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, jimmybcool said:

But this isn't the IRS asking him.  They already have them and one has to assume in his tax bracket audit them every year.  It is his political opponents asking for them so they can sift through with a fine toothed comb and find ANYTHING that could be spun as illegal or unethical.  Just as they have done over and over again with other issues.  Like the latest bogus assault about Russians putting bounties on our troops.  Or the original Russian collusion.  

 

But heck, I'm OK with he being forced to show them.  Just so long as we understand it goes both ways.  I want to see Biden's sons returns.  I want Obamas college transcripts opened up.  Kerry's military records unsealed.  If we are going to seriously do due diligence on Trump open it wide up.  And let's have a serious inquiry into Hillary's use of a private server, and Benghazi........

 

The funniest thing in all this is the right wingers who thought Hillary would go to jail.  And now the left wingers think Trump is going to jail.  ????????

 

 

 

 

I want to see Nancy Pelosi's financial records. She seems to have done rather well for someone that never had a proper job.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I want to see Nancy Pelosi's financial records. She seems to have done rather well for someone that never had a proper job.

Oh I’m sure they are available lol otherwise old Donald would be having another twitter tantrum and sniveling about beeing the biggest victim ever lol the dudes a dirty little monkey and soon very soon he will be exposed just as soon as he’s run out of the White House 

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

After this could we have disclosure of ALL financial records for those involved in the white house and both houses, it would be fascinating

Auditors need to ask questions about where some of these fortunes came from

Edited by piewarmer
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

The extent to which the president is going to protect the financial records indicates that the information contained therein is particularly damaging to his freedom, legacy (cough/spit), family (like he cares, OK, maybe Ivanka) and company.

 

That said, he's got to know that it will eventually come out, so he's stuck stewing in his own vat of paranoia.

 

Can't ever see anything be named after him, save for the odd Institute for the Criminally Insane, in Alabama.

 

He will forever and ever be remembered as a failure. And pesented as such in future Broadway plays and Hollywood films, like his mentor Roy Cohn.

 

The word "trump" will become both a noun and a verb.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by mtls2005
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, candide said:

Shameless deflection, as noticed by Jingthing

Here it is, BTW

http://clerk.house.gov/public_disc/financial-pdfs/2016/10015814.pdf

 

So we have records from Clinton (both), Biden, Pelosi, etc...  

Why is it that Trump's financial information must be kept secret? 

Nothing to fear, nothing to hide! ????????????????????

 

Applies to all in government or no one, IMO. Even the dogcatcher should have records published.

In the real world we understand that it doesn't matter if a rich person's tax records are published as they pay lotsacash to clever accountants to hide the real stuff. IMO no one really cares about Trump's taxes- they are just using them as another stick to beat him with. 3 1/2 years and umpteen sticks later still have nothing to show for it, LOL.

4 more years.

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, mtls2005 said:

The extent to which the president is going to protect the financial records indicates that the information contained therein is particularly damaging to his freedom, legacy (cough/spit), family (like he cares, OK, maybe Ivanka) and company.

 

That said, he's got to know that it will eventually come out, so he's stuck stewing in his own vat of paranoia.

 

Can't ever see anything be named after him, save for the odd Institute for the Criminally Insane, in Alabama.

 

He will forever and ever be remembered as a failure. And pesented as such in future Broadway plays and Hollywood films, like his mentor Roy Cohn.

 

The word "trump" will become both a noun and a verb.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOL.

More likely IMO is that he's just taunting his opponents and when they come out after the election they'll be just another nothing burger to add to the mountain of them.

  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

LOL.

More likely IMO is that he's just taunting his opponents and when they come out after the election they'll be just another nothing burger to add to the mountain of them.

Yeah....OK.....totally convincing!

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

More likely IMO is that he's just taunting his opponents and when they come out after the election they'll be just another nothing burger to add to the mountain of them.

 

4D chess?

 

Yeah, right.

 

 

Posted
22 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Shameless deflection.

She's not running for president.

I don't see how it is deflection.  If people want Trumps tax records to search for corruption or influence then Pelosi should also be fair game.  She wields enormous power as SOTH and has been in congress for a long time. If she is being influenced by Russia or China etc we need to know.

 

I say change the law and make it mandatory for every member of congress and presidents to have open financial records.  And if there is even an inkling of corruption by their family benefiting from inside information or influence (ala Trump Jr or Biden's son) open them up too.  I take no side.  I want to clean out corruption of any stripe.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
21 hours ago, jcsmith said:

The Pelosi stuff is just him trying to deflect. Not only is Pelosi not running for president, but she is also not fighting to keep them private. Nor did she lie to the public about not being able to release them because she was under audit. Nor has she had any criminal investigations or scandals which would merit needing her tax returns. Nor has she promised the public in the past that she would release them. Trump did. He promised people that once his fictitious audit was finished he'd release them. Now four years later he's doing everything in his power to keep from releasing them.

 

Why is that? What is he hiding?

Doesn't matter if Trump releases them or not. If there's nothing bad in them the haters will just say that he's been hiding the bad stuff, and there can't be anything illegal or the IRS would already have done something about that.

 

If I were Trump, and had suffered all the garbage and <deleted> that's been heaped on him for the past 4 years I'd be trying to keep them secret just for a bit of payback. Given by the hysteria it does seem to be working.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Doesn't matter if Trump releases them or not...trying to keep them secret just for a bit of payback

Why has he refused to release them for 4 years, then? No particular reason? No-one believes that. And you think he should now withhold them out of spite? 

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, teatime101 said:

Why has he refused to release them for 4 years, then? No particular reason? No-one believes that. And you think he should now withhold them out of spite? 

Yes.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Doesn't matter if Trump releases them or not. If there's nothing bad in them the haters will just say that he's been hiding the bad stuff, and there can't be anything illegal or the IRS would already have done something about that.

 

If I were Trump, and had suffered all the garbage and <deleted> that's been heaped on him for the past 4 years I'd be trying to keep them secret just for a bit of payback. Given by the hysteria it does seem to be working.

You do understand why President's have always released their tax returns, don't you?  It's to eliminate even the perception of conflict of interest when setting both domestic and international policy.  It's so that we don't wonder why Trump sold arms to Saudi Arabia against the wishes of Congress.  And why Trump has ignored all Russian transgressions including bounties.  And why Trump wants to shut down the investigation of a Turkish bank.  And why Ivanka managed to get all those Chinese trademarks.  And Jared/Qatar.  Etc.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

You do understand why President's have always released their tax returns, don't you?  It's to eliminate even the perception of conflict of interest when setting both domestic and international policy.  It's so that we don't wonder why Trump sold arms to Saudi Arabia against the wishes of Congress.  And why Trump has ignored all Russian transgressions including bounties.  And why Trump wants to shut down the investigation of a Turkish bank.  And why Ivanka managed to get all those Chinese trademarks.  And Jared/Qatar.  Etc.

 

 

President's have always released their tax returns,

 

 

https://www.efile.com/historic-1040-income-tax-returns-of-us-presidents-and-candidates/

Presidents of the United States make their tax returns a matter of public record. However, the practice of releasing returns as president or when running for office didn't become commonplace until the late 1960's.

 

Bolding by me

 

https://www.taxnotes.com/presidential-tax-returns

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Are presidents required to release their tax returns?

Presidents aren’t required by law to release their tax returns.

Edited by thaibeachlovers
  • Thanks 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

You know full well that being the Narcissist that he is, if 45's tax returns actually were impressive and showed him to be the successful business person he pretends to be, he would already have signed an Executive Order mandating they be required reading in all US Public Schools.

 

As for his 'immunity', perhaps someone should inform him that those guys Jefferson and Madison could have used the Magna Carta as the founding document of the United States, but they made a conscious choice to exclude any leader, monarch or otherwise, from such immunity.

 

In the documents those men authored, ALL are equal under the law, and NOBODY is above the law.

 

Sorry 45, it's called the Constitution.

Soooooo. Quote the part of the constitution that says presidential candidate tax returns have to be published.

:violin:

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/10/2020 at 11:08 AM, Emdog said:

Why are so many Trump backers comfortable with his hiding and lying? Seriously

Seriously, have you seen the opposition? great if your a socialist I guess!

Does this mean that we will now be able to see the tax records for Biden and Pelosi, very rich "government" employees?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, CGW said:

Seriously, have you seen the opposition? great if your a socialist I guess!

Does this mean that we will now be able to see the tax records for Biden and Pelosi, very rich "government" employees?

Yes you may and Biden is poorer than Tucker Carlson. As for Pelosi, she not running for the White House. 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-releases-financial-disclosure-form-latest-tax-returns

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Yes you may and Biden is poorer than Tucker Carlson. As for Pelosi, she not running for the White House. 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-releases-financial-disclosure-form-latest-tax-returns

Thanks, guess Joe can always borrow a few $ from his son if needs be,

Politics obviously pays well as Pelosi, despite not running for the WH (great reasoning by the way ???? ) has been extremely thrifty and managed to accumulate ~USD120m, on quite a meagre salary as well. ????

Tucker Carlson makes $6m a year in salary, understandable why he has more net worth than a politician who makes 5% of that.

Admirable how folks can make excuses isn't it.

Edited by CGW
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, CGW said:

Thanks, guess Joe can always borrow a few $ from his son if needs be,

Politics obviously pays well as Pelosi, despite not running for the WH (great reasoning by the way ???? ) has been extremely thrifty and managed to accumulate ~USD120m, on quite a meagre salary as well. ????

Tucker Carlson makes $6m a year in salary, understandable why he has more net worth than a politician who makes 5% of that.

Admirable how folks can make excuses isn't it.

Perhaps this link can provide the information as to how Pelosi and her husband made their fortune in real estates. Still pittance compare to Trump but who really know his wealth. 

 

https://moneyinc.com/nancy-pelosi-net-worth/

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

We were told that trump's tax returns were under audit, and that he would release them when the audit was completed.

 

Have heard some rumblings (rugy g, among others) that the audits are complete, maybe excluding 2019, and that he had to adjust some returns and pay fines.

 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...