Jump to content

PM admits it is unfortunate that Dr. Somkid and his team left the Government


webfact

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, faraday said:

 

https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/thailand/publication/taking-the-pulse-of-poverty-and-inequality-in-thailand

 

 

"Between 2015 and 2018, the poverty rate in Thailand grew from 7.21% to 9.85% and the absolute number of people living in poverty increased from 4.85 million to more than 6.7 million."

Yes agreed, the causes being:

 

  • Over the past few years, Thailand’s growth rate has been lower than other large economies in the developing East Asia and Pacific region. In October 2019, Thailand had one of the lowest GDP growth rates in the region, at 2.7%.
  • Growth has been moderating across the region as trade and economic growth have also weakened globally, affecting exports.
  • Droughts have affected the livelihoods of farmers who are already typically the poorest.
  • Tourism has experienced declines.

Except Thailand did not suffer from drops in tourism and exports.

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking up a country and an economy so heavily reliant on tourism and finding that nobody is willing to travel to your country is brutal.  To insist on telling lies about the situation does nothing but garner distrust.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some inflammatory bickering posts and replies have been removed.

 

Some posts with off topic generalizations to the current circumstances of why Dr. Somkid and his team left the Government have been removed. This topic is about:

 

Thailand’s Prime Minister, Prayut Chan-o-cha, admitted today (Thursday) that it was a shame that Deputy Prime Minister Somkid Jatusripitak and his four-man economic team has left the Government adding, however, that their departures were necessary under the present circumstances.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2020 at 4:04 PM, rasmus5150 said:

Yes. We should have kept Yingluck as PM. She did such a good job reading scripts and answering questions from reporters.

 

I cannot imagine what kind of pandemonium Thailand would be in, if she was at the helm.

Many seem to have forgotten the unsolvable "Red Shirt/Yellow Shirt" confrontation that reigned for 6 months.  Government offices occupied, major thoroughfares shut down, (Asok for one) Barbed wire rolls on Sukhumvit and troops on pedestrian walkways.  Neither side had any intention of giving in.

 

The heavy hand of Chan Ocha and the Military Council was the only available path at the time to regain any form of normality.  Military juntas are certainly not a form of good government but in this case, it was the junta or bloodshed on a frightening scale. 

The heavy hand fell hardest on Isan and Red Shirt activists. Yellow Shirt Royalists got a pass.  It wasn't fair but the Red Shirts were revving-up for a violent insurrection with hard core agitators taking over leadership roles.   Sometimes, there is no fair way.

 

Taksin and his family were social progressives who did do a lot to open economic opportunity to Isan's impoverished farmers but they were also deeply corrupt and self- aggrandizing.  Taksin would himself probably have eventually become a heavy handed dictator, given the chance. 

 

It may be true that Chan Ocha's time has passed and he should step aside but he should be given credit for quelling what could have been a conflagration in a relatively non-violent manner.  

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the 2014 coup the wealth disparity in Thailand is getting worse every year. Oddly enough, the reason given for the coup was to stamp out corruption and enrich the lives of the Thai people. Obviously some have benefited more than others. 

 

According to the Bank of Thailand’s research institute, the Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research, approximately 36 percent of Thailand’s corporate equity is held by just 500 people compared to the country’s current population of about 69,625,582 people. The institute’s report states that each of these 500 individuals amass some 3.1 billion baht (US$102 million) per year in company profits. This is compared to the average yearly household income of around US$10,000. https://theaseanpost.com/article/growing-gap-between-richest-and-poorest-thais

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A post quoting multiple replies has been removed, please do not do this as it causes problem further down the page and is against forum rules.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2020 at 5:01 PM, Mr Meeseeks said:

She certainly did do a better job. 

 

At least she did not resort to throwing banana skins, threatening journalists, touching them inappropriately and putting cardboard cutouts out to answer questions he can't or doesn't want to answer. 

don't want to head off-topic- but I'm still looking for Yinglucks tablets I have asked dozens of rural families - they have never seen one; just like they have never received a single baht from this govt. during this virus tragedy. as the Thai expression goes 'kin thray' or gin sai - eat sand.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, dddave said:

Many seem to have forgotten the unsolvable "Red Shirt/Yellow Shirt" confrontation that reigned for 6 months.  Government offices occupied, major thoroughfares shut down, (Asok for one) Barbed wire rolls on Sukhumvit and troops on pedestrian walkways.  Neither side had any intention of giving in.

 

The heavy hand of Chan Ocha and the Military Council was the only available path at the time to regain any form of normality.  Military juntas are certainly not a form of good government but in this case, it was the junta or bloodshed on a frightening scale. 

The heavy hand fell hardest on Isan and Red Shirt activists. Yellow Shirt Royalists got a pass.  It wasn't fair but the Red Shirts were revving-up for a violent insurrection with hard core agitators taking over leadership roles.   Sometimes, there is no fair way.

 

Taksin and his family were social progressives who did do a lot to open economic opportunity to Isan's impoverished farmers but they were also deeply corrupt and self- aggrandizing.  Taksin would himself probably have eventually become a heavy handed dictator, given the chance. 

 

It may be true that Chan Ocha's time has passed and he should step aside but he should be given credit for quelling what could have been a conflagration in a relatively non-violent manner.  

truth be told - we settled in Thailand in 1996. The only time we were truly scared that we could end up in a civil war was prior to the coup. The problem, as always is power corrupts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, metisdead said:

Some more tedious bickering posts have been removed. 

Thanks for doing this. This is an interesting phenomenon which I have also noted on several FB forums I participate in. During the lockdown, absence of beer supplies and companionship, the bickering has reached new heights. An indication of how little we have progressed, as we respond to the current state of the world.. On the positive side, many expats are feeding the hungry Thais and Burmese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""