Jump to content

UK's Johnson says there is no alternative to lockdown


Recommended Posts

Posted

UK's Johnson says there is no alternative to lockdown

 

2020-11-01T223804Z_1_LYNXMPEGA01DH_RTROPTP_4_BRITAIN-BANKS-RISKS.JPG

FILE PHOTO: A person wearing a mask walks past the Bank of England in London, Britain, March 23, 2020. REUTERS/Toby Melville/File Photo

 

LONDON (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Boris Johnson will on Monday say there is no alternative but to lock down England as lawmakers prepare to vote on measures to contain a second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

After resisting calls for a new national lockdown for most of last month, Johnson announced on Saturday that restrictions across England will begin after midnight on Thursday and last until Dec. 2.

 

The United Kingdom, which has the highest official COVID-19 death toll in Europe, is grappling with more than 20,000 new cases a day. Scientists have warned a worst-case scenario of 80,000 dead could be exceeded this winter.

 

"Models of our scientists suggest that unless we act now, we could see deaths over the winter that are twice as bad or more compared with the first wave," Johnson is expected to say, according to his office.

 

"Faced with these latest figures, there is no alternative but to take further action at a national level."

 

Britain has reported 46,717 COVID-19 deaths - defined as those dying within 28 days of a positive test. A broader measure of those with COVID-19 on their death certificates puts the toll at 58,925.

 

Essential shops, schools, and universities in England will remain open but pubs and restaurants will be shut apart from for takeaways.

 

Outbound international travel will be discouraged except for work and non-essential retail will close.

 

Lawmakers will vote on these measures on Wednesday and the opposition Labour Party has offered its support.

 

The rest of the United Kingdom - Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland - have their own lockdown policies and enacted tougher health restrictions last month.

 

Cabinet minister Michael Gove on Sunday said England's lockdown could be extended beyond Dec. 2 if necessary, but Johnson will tell lawmakers that an extension is not the plan.

 

(Reporting by Andy Bruce; editing by Barbara Lewis)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-11-02
 
Posted
33 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

That makes sense to me. The first "wave" killed most of those that were going to die of underlying conditions when infected. After lockdown the non immune were infected leading to the second wave of infections, but as most of the likely to die had already died, the death rate is lower.

I'm sure some will disagree, so tell me why.

I disagree for the some reason that works on the assumption that those most likely to die were also those infected in 1st wave. 

Something is there in the data, I think it'll take a while to figure it out though. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, polpott said:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1102257/cumulative-coronavirus-cases-in-the-nordics/

 

Sweden:   Cumulative Covid cases 96K      Cumulative Covid deaths 5.9k

 

Norway:   Cumulative Covid cases  13k     Cumulative Covid deaths 267

 

Denmark: Cumulative Covid cases  30k     Cumulative Covid deaths 643

 

Finland:   Cumulative Covid cases   10k    Cumulative Covid deaths 346

 

Actually doing very badly compared to its neighbours who did enforce restrictions.

Even Sweden now admits that it got it wrong.

which nation has seen a lower death rate as of late then sweden ?

Screenshot (55).jpg

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, polpott said:

Thailand. I've shown you the stats. (yet again), and you choose to ignore them. Sweden's approach has failed, even the Swedish government now admit to that. Pity you can't.

we will be able to compare the two in a couple of months

when the balance is calculated,

that is to say, the testing and accounting just isnt good enough, we need to see if there is any anomaly in countries after new year

as compared to previous years

Edited by scammed
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, polpott said:

I've already illustrated how it fared worse than its neighbours. Britain one of the worst? Read and weep.

 

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/what-lockdown-sceptics-get-wrong-about-sweden

 

Wearing masks caused you to crash your car? Very Thai! Good one. More novel than brake failure.

media wants to makes headlines, their assessment is worthless.

yes, the mask directed my exhaust breath straight into my eyes

and agitated them, i am now technically blind on my left eye,

and it takes triangulation to pinpoint distance, which is also a requirement to pinpoint speed

Posted

Excess deaths per capita are the key to what might be happening.

 

Unfortunately not only do deaths lag the trend, but the data lags the deaths.....I'm not sure we will get a clear picture of what is happening until the New Year.

 

The only seemingly clear fact is that Johnson is bumbling buffoon and is way out of his depth.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, scammed said:

media wants to makes headlines, their assessment is worthless.

Media tells truth but their assessment doesn't agree with your agenda. Very Trumpian.

 

BTW. The Spectator is a right wing but well respected media source in the UK. Not prone to sensationalism.

 

 

Edited by polpott
  • Like 2
Posted

OMG...this has Cummings written all over it...

 

Excess deaths are well down for the data that is available, the indications are that the number of deaths will be nowhere near what they were in Spring....so?

 

Put out the news it is going to horrendous, introduce lockdown, not so many deaths......who's ya daddy?

 

Boris is our hero...he saved the nation.

Screen Shot 2020-11-02 at 04.01.49.png

Posted
4 minutes ago, polpott said:

Media tells truth but their assessment doesn't agree with your agenda. Very Trumpian.

 

BTW. The Spectator is a right wing but well respected media source in the UK. Not prone to sensationalism.

 

 

media is not a  respectable source, they are prone to sensationalism, its their work description to publish sensationalist headlines, to make a buck

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
Just now, scammed said:

media is not a  respectable source, they are prone to sensationalism, its their work description to publish sensationalist headlines, to make a buck

True if you read the Mail and the Express.

Posted
1 minute ago, scammed said:

media is not a  respectable source, they are prone to sensationalism, its their work description to publish sensationalist headlines, to make a buck

So we should believe you rather than The Spectator? The article contained facts, stats, graphs. What have you got other than "I think"? Don't make me laugh. :cheesy::cheesy::cheesy:

  • Haha 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, polpott said:

I've already illustrated how it fared worse than its neighbours. Britain one of the worst? Read and weep.

 

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/what-lockdown-sceptics-get-wrong-about-sweden

 

Wearing masks caused you to crash your car? Very Thai! Good one. More novel than brake failure.

Great article thank you.

I've been saying this for quite some time but it just falls on deaf ears for those too bunkered down in their echo chambers.

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, scammed said:

media wants to makes headlines, their assessment is worthless.

yes, the mask directed my exhaust breath straight into my eyes

and agitated them, i am now technically blind on my left eye,

and it takes triangulation to pinpoint distance, which is also a requirement to pinpoint speed

Your personal, anecdotal thoughts shouldn't be used as a benchmark for the masses. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, NorthernRyland said:

UK has got off the deep end. It's not THAT bad and It's been over for months.

 

860694087_COVID-whatwelearnedBBC.png.4da52b5f89fb30e1ef2bb06d97b3b4ac.png

.....the only defense I can see for locking down is that the projections do indeed show a massive increase in excess deaths...the current data shows little or no excess deaths...all very strange

Posted
Just now, johnnybangkok said:

Your personal, anecdotal thoughts shouldn't be used as a benchmark for the masses. 

Funny though, made me smile. 555

Posted
Just now, Surelynot said:

.....the only defense I can see for locking down is that the projections do indeed show a massive increase in excess deaths...the current data shows little or no excess deaths...all very strange

Rise in deaths lags rise in cases by 4-8 weeks.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

Your personal, anecdotal thoughts shouldn't be used as a benchmark for the masses. 

triangulation for measure depth is a mathematical fact,

and it take two eyes to triangulate.

back to your math lessons, and this time do your homework

Edited by scammed
Posted

I feel sorry for my family who are suffering financially. My brother owns a few pubs and shops and has had to pay his staff(well a %age) for months while getting no income himself. Boris is a bumbling posh <deleted>. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...