Trump takes fighting stance as election swings toward Biden

[Jeffr2]

1 hour ago, BobBKK said:

 

Of course it's a record and every election will be as the population is GROWING. Biden got most and Trump second in the history of US elections because?  yea, you got it... more people can vote. The Dem Party has certainly changed into PC Libs and I'm not sure how they can incorporate just under 50% of the country into unity. Let's see. 

It was a record. Way over previous totals. Nothing to do with a bigger population.

 

PC libs? What's wrong with you?

[Sujo]

33 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

 

  I think that they should concentrate on the allegation of voter fraud as thats far more serious than the data protection act  

The allegation is not founded on anything except someone says there must be. There is no evidence at all of voter fraud.

 

Did you note they didnt allege voter fraud in the court filing.

 

From the link.

 

While the lawsuit mentions "over 3,000 instances of ineligible individuals casting ballots," that is not included among the actual legal charges.

Edited November 8, 2020 by Sujo

[placeholder]

34 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

 

  I think that they should concentrate on the allegation of voter fraud as thats far more serious than the data protection act  

And if they had made an allegation of mass murder that would be more serious still. It's evident from reading the article that the case is based on the notion that you need a postal address in Nevada to be eligible to vote. Nevada says that's not the case. The resume of the lawyer is not exactly impressive. This suit will be dismissed like so many of the others.

[Sujo]

4 minutes ago, placeholder said:

And if they had made an allegation of mass murder that would be more serious still. It's evident from reading the article that the case is based on the notion that you need a postal address in Nevada to be eligible to vote. Nevada says that's not the case. The resume of the lawyer is not exactly impressive. This suit will be dismissed like so many of the others.

And by being so incompetent they have opened themselves and the trump campaign to criminal charges. All for something they dont even want charged.

 

What idiots.

[CorpusChristie]

13 minutes ago, placeholder said:

And if they had made an allegation of mass murder that would be more serious still. It's evident from reading the article that the case is based on the notion that you need a postal address in Nevada to be eligible to vote. Nevada says that's not the case. The resume of the lawyer is not exactly impressive. This suit will be dismissed like so many of the others.

 

   The allegation is that 10 000 people voted in the Nevada elections and they shouldnt have voted in those elections because they no longer live in Nevada 

[CorpusChristie]

9 minutes ago, Sujo said:

And by being so incompetent they have opened themselves and the trump campaign to criminal charges. All for something they dont even want charged.

 

What idiots.

 

    The agency that shared the info would get charged as they were the ones that shared it , the Trump campaign wont get charged with anything (Not that I think that anyone will get charged at all)

[placeholder]

4 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

 

   The allegation is that 10 000 people voted in the Nevada elections and they shouldnt have voted in those elections because they no longer live in Nevada 

And it's an allegation from a partisan source. Trump supporters must think that because such allegations  mention opossible crimes they  are somehow similar to a state sponsored investigation of such crimes. They're not. There's no reason to take this seriously unless and until the state does. And there are certainly indications that it's a garbage case. For instance the use of a no-name no-reputation lawyer to file the case. It probably means that no reputable lawyer  would touch it with a barge pole because it stinks so badly. Get back to us if and when the state launches an investigation. Until then, it's insignificant.

[Sujo]

8 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

 

   The allegation is that 10 000 people voted in the Nevada elections and they shouldnt have voted in those elections because they no longer live in Nevada 

There is no allegation, its not included in the charges to be considered because you dont have to live in nevada. Nothing illegal about it. Thats why its not in the charges.

 

[Sujo]

8 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

 

    The agency that shared the info would get charged as they were the ones that shared it , the Trump campaign wont get charged with anything (Not that I think that anyone will get charged at all)

And so would the receiving agency that used that info. Being a law and order person im sure u want that investigated.

Edited November 8, 2020 by Sujo

[Credo]

3 hours ago, CorpusChristie said:

 

   The allegation is that 10 000 people voted in the Nevada elections and they shouldnt have voted in those elections because they no longer live in Nevada 

You do not need to live in a state to be eligible to vote.   That is why there are absentee ballots.   I would suspect that a large number of people who work in places like Las Vegas may well be out-of-state with many of the casinos not operating with shows, entertainment and related activities.   

 

They will remain residents of Nevada until/unless they take up legal residence elsewhere.