Pennsylvania Judge Halts Further Vote Certification Steps

[pkspeaker]

I think if it goes to the supreme court, it's their call, and the evidence is solid, then the conservative court will be on the presidents side.. it's just like the last 15 years here here-the yellow(conservative) side thinks that voting should be well considered and has limits, Thaksins red's just wanted to throw ballots all over the place with village heads telling their people who to vote for..

 

in the US I think conservative judges will be inclined to throw out questionable votes, even if they throw out legitimate votes along with them, where the liberals are much looser with the votes, more like the voting is done by random mailers or like an internet poll-like 'likes' on a facebook group

[Sujo]

16 minutes ago, pkspeaker said:

I think if it goes to the supreme court, it's their call, and the evidence is solid, then the conservative court will be on the presidents side.. it's just like the last 15 years here here-the yellow(conservative) side thinks that voting should be well considered and has limits, Thaksins red's just wanted to throw ballots all over the place with village heads telling their people who to vote for..

 

in the US I think conservative judges will be inclined to throw out questionable votes, even if they throw out legitimate votes along with them, where the liberals are much looser with the votes, more like the voting is done by random mailers or like an internet poll-like 'likes' on a facebook group

The lawsuit is made by republicans complaining about the voting system republicans voted to approve. So they are suing themselves and holding up their own nominations.

 

Again, trump cant win anything, its not a lawsuit pertaining to what has been certified.

[Berkshire]

20 minutes ago, Sujo said:

The lawsuit is made by republicans complaining about the voting system republicans voted to approve. So they are suing themselves and holding up their own nominations.

 

Again, trump cant win anything, its not a lawsuit pertaining to what has been certified.

Maybe we should just let these bewildered Trump supporters cling onto that little sliver of false hope.  I mean, it's all they've got!

[welovesundaysatspace]

More clutching straws and wasting money. That corrupt lazy loser should use the remaining days in office to serve the American people instead of wasting the courts‘ time and providing his criminal buddies an out of jail card. But then again that’s all he was doing for four years. What a banana republic. 

[Jingthing]

5 minutes ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

More clutching straws and wasting money. That corrupt lazy loser should use the remaining days in office to serve the American people instead of wasting the courts‘ time and providing his criminal buddies an out of jail card. But then again that’s all he was doing for four years. What a banana republic. 

Why would he change now?

Counting the days until this American nightmare presidency ends.

[candide]

8 hours ago, candide said:

It could not be invented! ????

"The irony here is that Rep. Kelly won his election against Democratic nominee Kristy Gnibus, and is thereby seeking to prevent his own win from being certified."

https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/judge-presiding-over-bonkers-election-lawsuit-blocks-whatever-hasnt-been-certified-of-bidens-certified-pa-victory/

On top of it, the law in question has been voted by a GOP led legislature, so he basically filed a complaint against himself. ????

[Tie Dye Samurai]

4 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

Not a problem as trump won’t succeed in PA.

 

Now if you’ll excuse me I have some chickens to count. 

I am wondering who will concede first...Trump or Tippaporn.  

[japanese]

This is one of several lawsuits.

 

When they go to a Republican judge then they may be treated sympathetically.

 

They will be thrown out by Democrat judges.

 

Everything gets appealed up to the PA Supreme Court which is democrat and so will be thrown out at state level.

 

Then it goes to SCOTUS.  They may or may not take the case, but as Justice Alito has already involved himself, my guess is they will take it.

 

There is a 6-3 Republican leaning although Chief Justice John Roberts seems to not like Trump so maybe we end up with a 5-4 ruling for Trump.

 

Interesting how law can be seen differently depending on political and personal persuasion...

 

But anyone thinking this is over has not been paying attention to the big picture.  A little too much confirmation bias perhaps.

[placeholder]

4 minutes ago, japanese said:

This is one of several lawsuits.

 

When they go to a Republican judge then they may be treated sympathetically.

 

They will be thrown out by Democrat judges.

 

Everything gets appealed up to the PA Supreme Court which is democrat and so will be thrown out at state level.

 

Then it goes to SCOTUS.  They may or may not take the case, but as Justice Alito has already involved himself, my guess is they will take it.

 

There is a 6-3 Republican leaning although Chief Justice John Roberts seems to not like Trump so maybe we end up with a 5-4 ruling for Trump.

 

Interesting how law can be seen differently depending on political and personal persuasion...

 

But anyone thinking this is over has not been paying attention to the big picture.  A little too much confirmation bias perhaps.

Judge Brann who threw out the Republicans major case is a Republican.

[placnx]

24 minutes ago, candide said:

On top of it, the law in question has been voted by a GOP led legislature, so he basically filed a complaint against himself. ????

These Republicanistas rate #1 for hypocrisy and opportunism!

[placeholder]

5 minutes ago, japanese said:

This is one of several lawsuits.

 

When they go to a Republican judge then they may be treated sympathetically.

 

They will be thrown out by Democrat judges.

 

Everything gets appealed up to the PA Supreme Court which is democrat and so will be thrown out at state level.

 

Then it goes to SCOTUS.  They may or may not take the case, but as Justice Alito has already involved himself, my guess is they will take it.

 

There is a 6-3 Republican leaning although Chief Justice John Roberts seems to not like Trump so maybe we end up with a 5-4 ruling for Trump.

 

Interesting how law can be seen differently depending on political and personal persuasion...

 

But anyone thinking this is over has not been paying attention to the big picture.  A little too much confirmation bias perhaps.

 Alito ruled that mail in ballots arriving after November 3rd should be sequestered. About 10,000 ballots arrived late. Even if they are disqualified it would make no difference as to who Pennsylvania voters elected

[candide]

5 minutes ago, japanese said:

This is one of several lawsuits.

 

When they go to a Republican judge then they may be treated sympathetically.

 

They will be thrown out by Democrat judges.

 

Everything gets appealed up to the PA Supreme Court which is democrat and so will be thrown out at state level.

 

Then it goes to SCOTUS.  They may or may not take the case, but as Justice Alito has already involved himself, my guess is they will take it.

 

There is a 6-3 Republican leaning although Chief Justice John Roberts seems to not like Trump so maybe we end up with a 5-4 ruling for Trump.

 

Interesting how law can be seen differently depending on political and personal persuasion...

 

But anyone thinking this is over has not been paying attention to the big picture.  A little too much confirmation bias perhaps.

Republican judges have also thrown out Trump's campaign baseless lawsuits.

As concerns this case, it is about a lawsuit by Republican lawmakers to prevent their own election to be certified, as Biden election is already certified.

[placeholder]

27 minutes ago, candide said:

On top of it, the law in question has been voted by a GOP led legislature, so he basically filed a complaint against himself. ????

 This case is particularly hopeless for Trump supporters. There is some support for the notion that the Supreme Court will rule that only state legislatures  can make laws and rules regarding voting. If they so decide then questions as to the constitutionality of the law re the Pennsylvania State Constitution are null and void . If not then the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will almost certainly overrule Judge McCullough. It's what is called a lose-lose situation for Trump supporters.

[placnx]

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Why would he change now?

Counting the days until this American nightmare presidency ends.

The sad thing is that after January 20th his tweets will continue to delude too many, perhaps to promote the "vision" of his 2024 candidacy. Like the sequel of a horror movie, this will  continue.

 

Even if he ends up in jail, and that could take years with the appeals, he can have surrogates do his tweets as he manipulates people from the background. America will have its Dowager Empress as it was at the end of the Qing Dynasty.

[welovesundaysatspace]

 

15 minutes ago, japanese said:

But anyone thinking this is over has not been paying attention to the big picture.  A little too much confirmation bias perhaps.

No confirmation bias; it’s called being realistic. No Supreme Court will declare a whole election invalid and disenfranchise millions of voters. That is what happens when people watch too much Fox News and read too much Qanon nonsense: They lose their sanity and common sense and consider even the most ridiculous fantasy products a realistic possibility. Spend just two minutes on some of Trump’s followers Twitter accounts and you feel like you’re listening to a group of lunatics in a mental institution.

[pkspeaker]

3 minutes ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

 

No confirmation bias; it’s called being realistic. No Supreme Court will declare a whole election invalid and disenfranchise millions of voters. That is what happens when people watch too much Fox News and read too much Qanon nonsense: They lose their sanity and common sense and consider even the most ridiculous fantasy products a realistic possibility. Spend just two minutes on some of Trump’s followers Twitter accounts and you feel like you’re listening to a group of lunatics in a mental institution.

Maybe they won't disenfranchise millions of voters and instead will just toss the ones that smack of fraud.. or maybe they'll even order a new election?  who knows? enough with the 1000% sure statements in an unprecedented situation . . 

[Tie Dye Samurai]

3 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

The state Supreme Court has twice this month overturned Republican election challenges. Will be the same this time. Keep dreaming Trumpsters. 

I must admit....I am kind of enjoying watching MAGA (and a couple of self proclaimed "swing voters") refuse to acknowledge that they are on the wrong side of history. What I really love is it seems that, in their eyes, the evil democrats have been so masterful despite Dear President's repeated warnings of the impending fraud storm (ironic because the libs are supposedly stupid and of "low intelligence") that the leftists mob's diabolical plan has been so well thought out....so air tight....so deliciously evil in its pure maniacal darkness that no stone has been left unturned for Trump and his elite force of legal heroes to expose into the light, MAGA JUSTICE. How were the libs able, in the most scrutinized election ever, to win at every turn and put MAGA in such peril? How is it that this inferior leftist hoard was able to mount such a widespread coordinated caper of evil that ii has left MAGA in such a state of hopelessness that one has to harken back to the end scene of The Infinity War to see such desperation? 

 

Maybe MAGA can time travel back to December 31 2019 and find all the stones (more importantly Dear Presidents two stones) and make some better choices about pandemics and the economy and not want to open up at Easter, wear a mask, quit squawking about red states and blue states and be more concerned about OUR STATES. 

 

Yeah....time travel...Make America Great Again...(uh, again....)

[welovesundaysatspace]

1 minute ago, pkspeaker said:

 who knows? enough with the 1000% sure statements in an unprecedented situation . . 

Like I said, every sane person knows. Only the conspiracy theory brigade considers this “an unprecedented situation”. 

[Eric Loh]

19 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Giuliani and others admitted that they had submitted no evidence of fraud. Nor did their lawsuits contend such.

They did submitted some  “at best, garden-variety irregularities”. ????

[japanese]

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

Judge Brann who threw out the Republicans major case is a Republican.

Perhaps there is more than one Judge Brann serving in PA as apparently he was nominated by Obama.  Or perhaps just happens to be Obama's kind of conservative?

 

https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/brann-matthew-william

[canuckamuck]

2 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Other states were allowed to start counting early. Pa was not. Repubs wouldnt allow it.

 

So when all the walk in votes were already being tallied in real time they started opening mail ins, thats why it took so long.

 

Everyone knew this was going to happen. The repubs caused it to be done that way.

Oh, it was the Republicans that cause it, I see.

[riclag]

1 hour ago, japanese said:

This is one of several lawsuits.

 

When they go to a Republican judge then they may be treated sympathetically.

 

They will be thrown out by Democrat judges.

 

Everything gets appealed up to the PA Supreme Court which is democrat and so will be thrown out at state level.

 

Then it goes to SCOTUS.  They may or may not take the case, but as Justice Alito has already involved himself, my guess is they will take it.

 

There is a 6-3 Republican leaning although Chief Justice John Roberts seems to not like Trump so maybe we end up with a 5-4 ruling for Trump.

 

Interesting how law can be seen differently depending on political and personal persuasion...

 

But anyone thinking this is over has not been paying attention to the big picture.  A little too much confirmation bias perhaps.

Pennsylvania state legislature is holding hearings of election issues and irregularities with  witnesses who have signed sworn affidavits ! This is the first time the  witnesses have spoken out publicly in a hearing ,I believe.

It's  dangerously convincing  from what I'm hearing  and now   a judge has  ordered a evidentiary hearing !

Its gonna all play out in the Supreme Court imop . Truth and justice  will rule the day ,its the American way!

 

 

 

[Sujo]

2 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

Oh, it was the Republicans that cause it, I see.

Yes, they control the legislature, the dems wanted to start counting early. Repubs refused. So blame repubs for the late surge.

[japanese]

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

 Alito ruled that mail in ballots arriving after November 3rd should be sequestered. About 10,000 ballots arrived late. Even if they are disqualified it would make no difference as to who Pennsylvania voters elected

I suspect that number is in dispute.

 

Alito also ordered that Republicans had to have access to observe the vote counting.  That was ignored by the Democratic  operatives running the count.  So he had to reissue the order.

 

Way to go to <deleted> off a supreme court judge!

[Sujo]

1 minute ago, riclag said:

Pennsylvania state legislature is holding hearings of election issues and irregularities with  witnesses who have signed sworn affidavits ! This is the first time the  witnesses have spoken out publicly in a hearing ,I believe.

It's  dangerously convincing  from what I'm hearing  and now   a judge has  ordered a evidentiary hearing !

Its gonna all play out in the Supreme Court imop . Truth and justice  will rule the day ,its the American way!

 

 

 

No its not an official hearing. Its an unofficial hearing set up by only repub members. Its basically a rally.

[japanese]

1 hour ago, candide said:

Republican judges have also thrown out Trump's campaign baseless lawsuits.

As concerns this case, it is about a lawsuit by Republican lawmakers to prevent their own election to be certified, as Biden election is already certified.

I would be interested to see the links to the lawsuits you mention and the judges.  No doubt there are exceptions to the rule.  And in any case a sufficient number may well be appealed up to SCOTUS which is my main point.

 

But with so much irregularity and so many lawsuits, I would not expect all of them to prevail in any case.

[Sujo]

3 minutes ago, japanese said:

I suspect that number is in dispute.

 

Alito also ordered that Republicans had to have access to observe the vote counting.  That was ignored by the Democratic  operatives running the count.  So he had to reissue the order.

 

Way to go to <deleted> off a supreme court judge!

No repub observers were denied entry to observe.

[canuckamuck]

2 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Yes, they control the legislature, the dems wanted to start counting early. Repubs refused. So blame repubs for the late surge.

Well the ball is rolling now, should be lots of action in the next couple of days. I need me some poppin corn.

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, japanese said:

I suspect that number is in dispute.

 

Alito also ordered that Republicans had to have access to observe the vote counting.  That was ignored by the Democratic  operatives running the count.  So he had to reissue the order.

 

Way to go to <deleted> off a supreme court judge!

No, the number is not in dispute. Except if you count yourself and your baseless doubts.

Couldnt find any evidence to back up your contention about Alito ordering Republican ob servers be allowed access to observe votes. Can you share a link to that info with the rest of us?

[placeholder]

7 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Yes, they control the legislature, the dems wanted to start counting early. Repubs refused. So blame repubs for the late surge.

Well, to be fair, the Republicans had good grounds for their refusal. After all, counting mail-in ballots early is the way they do it in socialist enclaves like Iowa.