Probe of Biden's son places new scrutiny on U.S. attorney general pick

[stevenl]

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Err, the election was last month. Are you saying it could effect Biden's win?

And probes into Hunter Biden were non existent before the election?

[thaibeachlovers]

1 minute ago, stevenl said:

And probes into Hunter Biden were non existent before the election?

Before the election the pro Biden media apparently didn't even write about it. Many that voted for Biden apparently hadn't even heard of it, and I believe that Twitter banned any mention of it. I saw a news clip where the boss of Twitter apologised for that.

[placeholder]

7 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Before the election the pro Biden media apparently didn't even write about it. Many that voted for Biden apparently hadn't even heard of it, and I believe that Twitter banned any mention of it. I saw a news clip where the boss of Twitter apologised for that.

They didn't write about the alleged computer and what it contained. The reason for that being that its provenance was not established. The NY Post did zero investigative work on the alleged info. The reporter who wrote the story refused to have his name attached to it. Giuliani refused to release the metadata that could have established the validity of the information and the provenance of the computer. And there was the bizarreness of the story itself. Apart from that, there was no good reason to ignore the story.

[xylophone]

On 12/11/2020 at 7:31 AM, TopDeadSenter said:

What, to actually have evidence before launching an investigation? You bet it will be a refreshing change.

My, oh my, you trumpies are certainly "quick learners"..........oh wait, trump and his cohorts proceeded without any evidence and thought they would win, and look how that has turned out. You can't fix stupid.

[thaibeachlovers]

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

They didn't write about the alleged computer and what it contained. The reason for that being that its provenance was not established. The NY Post did zero investigative work on the alleged info. The reporter who wrote the story refused to have his name attached to it. Giuliani refused to release the metadata that could have established the validity of the information and the provenance of the computer. And there was the bizarreness of the story itself. Apart from that, there was no good reason to ignore the story.

Far as I know they ignored Bobulinsky telling how he had personal knowledge of wrongdoing by Hunter Biden. That  was in October and was nothing to do with the computer.

[Jeffr2]

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Far as I know they ignored Bobulinsky telling how he had personal knowledge of wrongdoing by Hunter Biden. That  was in October and was nothing to do with the computer.

This was reported, but it's a "he said, she said" thing.  It can't be confirmed.  So yes, many ignored it.  Only Trump's cult members paid attention to this.

 

 

[placeholder]

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Far as I know they ignored Bobulinsky telling how he had personal knowledge of wrongdoing by Hunter Biden. That  was in October and was nothing to do with the computer.

And without independent confirmation, what is Bobulinski's word worth? Or maybe you'll tell me that  unsupported affidavits ought to count as serious evidence? We've seen what courts think of that.

[TopDeadSenter]

5 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

This was reported, but it's a "he said, she said" thing.  It can't be confirmed.  So yes, many ignored it.  Only Trump's cult members paid attention to this.

 

 

What are you talking about? They have the emails, with Bobulinski copied in. He has confirmed exactly what was going on in China, and confirmed the emails are legitimate. From memory didn't Hunter's partner Devon Archer also confirm them from prison, and gave the police his login password for extra confirmation of the emails.

 

 End of the day, there is one easy question. It would put all suspicions about biden to bed right now. But the left just can not answer it, which is why there is the need for censorship. Maybe Jeffr2 can answer it, must be worth a try?

 

 Why did America's overseas enemies like China and Russia pay millions of dollars to Hunter Biden? Before answering bear in mind that Hunter himself knows he was not qualified for these positions, he is not an energy expert, nor does he speak Chinese or Russian. They did not pay him for fun. Compare your answer with the Bobulinski interviews and you will see why conservatives are extremely concerned about Joe Biden assuming the Presidency. And you will see why the left need censorship to try maintaining a facade of respectability which is laughed at by the other 1/2 of the divide. The question is open for anyone, and will be asked over and over until it is answered. If you can't answer the question satisfactorily, you again confirm what is and was obvious from the start.

 

[Jeffr2]

1 minute ago, TopDeadSenter said:

What are you talking about? They have the emails, with Bobulinski copied in. He has confirmed exactly what was going on in China, and confirmed the emails are legitimate. From memory didn't Hunter's partner Devon Archer also confirm them from prison, and gave the police his login password for extra confirmation of the emails.

 

 End of the day, there is one easy question. It would put all suspicions about biden to bed right now. But the left just can not answer it, which is why there is the need for censorship. Maybe Jeffr2 can answer it, must be worth a try?

 

 Why did America's overseas enemies like China and Russia pay millions of dollars to Hunter Biden? Before answering bear in mind that Hunter himself knows he was not qualified for these positions, he is not an energy expert, nor does he speak Chinese or Russian. They did not pay him for fun. Compare your answer with the Bobulinski interviews and you will see why conservatives are extremely concerned about Joe Biden assuming the Presidency. And you will see why the left need censorship to try maintaining a facade of respectability which is laughed at by the other 1/2 of the divide. The question is open for anyone, and will be asked over and over until it is answered. If you can't answer the question satisfactorily, you again confirm what is and was obvious from the start.

 

Show a link to prove this otherwise it's just blah, blah, blah.

[TopDeadSenter]

1 minute ago, Jeffr2 said:

Show a link to prove this otherwise it's just blah, blah, blah.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/tucker-carlson-tony-bobulinski-interview-draws-7-6-million-viewers

 

I remind you Fox News is rated as "Mixed" by the fact check this forum uses, so pls watch the interviews and finally give a straight answer about why Hunter Biden was paid vast sums of money by enemy states.

[stevenl]

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Before the election the pro Biden media apparently didn't even write about it. Many that voted for Biden apparently hadn't even heard of it, and I believe that Twitter banned any mention of it. I saw a news clip where the boss of Twitter apologised for that.

They did write about it. But on the media questions 'please show us the metadata so the emails can be verified' it has been awfully quiet. So it was, rightfully, ignored.

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/tucker-carlson-tony-bobulinski-interview-draws-7-6-million-viewers

 

I remind you Fox News is rated as "Mixed" by the fact check this forum uses, so pls watch the interviews and finally give a straight answer about why Hunter Biden was paid vast sums of money by enemy states.

This is your idea of independent evidence? An interview by Tucker Carlson? It is to laugh. Here's something from a more serious source, the Wall Street Journal:

"Text messages and emails related to the venture that were provided to the Journal by Mr. Bobulinski, mainly from the spring and summer of 2017, don’t show either Hunter Biden or James Biden discussing a role for Joe Biden in the venture."

Hunter Biden’s Ex-Business Partner Alleges Father Knew About Venture - WSJ

[Jeffr2]

5 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/tucker-carlson-tony-bobulinski-interview-draws-7-6-million-viewers

 

I remind you Fox News is rated as "Mixed" by the fact check this forum uses, so pls watch the interviews and finally give a straight answer about why Hunter Biden was paid vast sums of money by enemy states.

Oh come on.  Fox News and Tucker?  Zip credibility.  But shows what you fall for!

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-fox-news-georgia-voter-fraud-agnes-blalock-election-2020-11

Quote

Tucker Carlson apologized on-air for making a false accusation of voter fraud in Georgia

 

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/tucker-carlson/

[Jeffr2]

8 minutes ago, placeholder said:

This is your idea of independent evidence? An interview by Tucker Carlson? It is to laugh. Here's something from a more serious source, the Wall Street Journal:

"Text messages and emails related to the venture that were provided to the Journal by Mr. Bobulinski, mainly from the spring and summer of 2017, don’t show either Hunter Biden or James Biden discussing a role for Joe Biden in the venture."

Hunter Biden’s Ex-Business Partner Alleges Father Knew About Venture - WSJ

Shhh....Trump's supporters don't want to know the truth.  As has been proven here.

[TopDeadSenter]

13 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

Oh come on.  Fox News and Tucker?  Zip credibility.  But shows what you fall for!

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-fox-news-georgia-voter-fraud-agnes-blalock-election-2020-11

 

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/tucker-carlson/

It confirms the authenticity of the laptops and their hard drives. It is corroborating evidence. I knew you couldn't answer why America's enemies paid unqualified Hunter Biden 10's of millions for ostensibly nothing. I just knew it!

[Jeffr2]

3 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

It confirms the authenticity of the laptops and their hard drives. It is corroborating evidence. I knew you couldn't answer why America's enemies paid unqualified Hunter Biden 10's of millions for ostensibly nothing. I just knew it!

It confirms nothing other than your deep desire to believe in fake news.  This has been proven.  I just knew it!

[placeholder]

11 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

It confirms the authenticity of the laptops and their hard drives. It is corroborating evidence. I knew you couldn't answer why America's enemies paid unqualified Hunter Biden 10's of millions for ostensibly nothing. I just knew it!

He gave his interviews after the information was released. So no, it confirms nothing. As the Wall Street Journal pointed out, the texts he shared with them prove nothing about the involvement of Joe Biden and nothing to establish the authenticity of the computer. 

Edited December 14, 2020 by placeholder

[Berkshire]

34 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/tucker-carlson-tony-bobulinski-interview-draws-7-6-million-viewers

 

I remind you Fox News is rated as "Mixed" by the fact check this forum uses, so pls watch the interviews and finally give a straight answer about why Hunter Biden was paid vast sums of money by enemy states.

Sorry, but even Fox News own lawyers argued IN COURT that Tucker Carlson cannot be taken seriously....

 

[A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit against Fox News after lawyers for the network argued that no "reasonable viewer" would take the network's primetime star Tucker Carlson seriously.]

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9

 

 

[candide]

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Before the election the pro Biden media apparently didn't even write about it. Many that voted for Biden apparently hadn't even heard of it, and I believe that Twitter banned any mention of it. I saw a news clip where the boss of Twitter apologised for that.

And they were right, due to the suspect nature of the non-evidence provided.

The whole story does not make any sense! 

 

If Giuliani had true evidence, what would have been the expected behaviour?

Make digital copies of the computer files and distribute it to well know media such as Fox News, CNN, etc... and also foreign media such as  the BBC, The Telegraph, and maybe also some Computer magazines. It would have ensured wide diffusion and give everyone the opportunity to check files.

 

What happened: he lost time making pdf copies which cannot be checked and gave it to a minor media. And then, Fox News was able to intensively promote  this conspiracy without having to bare any risk, as it always was "according to the NYP..."

 

Giuliani's lame trick was so obvious... ????

[billd766]

On 12/11/2020 at 2:58 PM, Thingamabob said:

Much more to come on this, and on the Bidens' wealth acquisition generally. 

Biden's tax returns are available I believe.

 

Has anybody seen Trumps tax files yet? How many YEARS have we been waiting for them?

 

They generally give an idea of wealth.

 

On 12/11/2020 at 8:34 PM, Kelsall said:

and many other issues as well.

Especially when we get to see Trump's tax files.