JonnyF Posted February 6, 2021 Share Posted February 6, 2021 3 hours ago, candide said: Binding or not, what UK did is allowed by EU law, so it was not resulting from an additional freedom caused by Brexit. It would breach EU agreements. Obviously that's ok if you are German as all member states are equal but some are more equal than others. https://euobserver.com/coronavirus/150554 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted February 6, 2021 Share Posted February 6, 2021 1 hour ago, JonnyF said: It would breach EU agreements. Obviously that's ok if you are German as all member states are equal but some are more equal than others. https://euobserver.com/coronavirus/150554 The agreement was not imposed. Member states made a choice. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenl Posted February 6, 2021 Share Posted February 6, 2021 2 hours ago, JonnyF said: It would breach EU agreements. Obviously that's ok if you are German as all member states are equal but some are more equal than others. https://euobserver.com/coronavirus/150554 Many memberstates bought vaccines individually, it seems they were all free to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyF Posted February 7, 2021 Share Posted February 7, 2021 (edited) 12 hours ago, stevenl said: Many memberstates bought vaccines individually, it seems they were all free to do that. Wrong again. No they weren’t. Germany did it anyway because Germany gets to do what it wants without reprisal. https://www.politico.eu/article/germanys-coronavirus-vaccine-side-deal-at-odds-with-legally-binding-eu-pact/ Edited February 7, 2021 by JonnyF 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surelynot Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 You couldn't write this stuff....what a farce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surelynot Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 When pushed on his “oven-ready” Brexit deal, Boris Johnson said that he had meant the withdrawal agreement, and not the political declaration and subsequent trade deal. Now he is disowning that agreement and threatening to override it. Was it his agreement or wasn’t it? Did he understand it when he signed it and then pushed it through parliament, or not? Letters to the Guardian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tebee Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 OK I can understand that many Brexiters on here don't understand what the UK becoming a third country means and the implications of that for exporting to the EU, but George Eustice, the Secretary of State ? He wrote to the EU commission complaining that " trade which has been in place for many years” is no longer permitted. What part of "Brexit means Brexit" does he not understand ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now