Jump to content

Vaccination (To be or not to be)


DUNROAMIN

Recommended Posts

On 4/21/2022 at 6:28 PM, HarrySeaman said:

Allergic reactions to vaccines are common, everyone of them from DPT to the flu.

 

The Salk polio vaccine was a killed virus and nobody got polio from it, but some did have an allergic reaction. 


Things changed when an attenuated polio virus arrived.  It gave better protection but a very small percentage of people with weak immune systems got polio from it.  I would call that a severe reaction to a non Covid-19 vaccine.

I have a friend from NZ (now 78) who had the polio vaccine as a kid and spent weeks in a polio hospital partially paralysed. he recovered completely but says he'll never forget the horror of so many kids in iron lungs. Vaccines are a great invention, shame about the unfounded anti vax zealotry.

 

My mum (now 93) actually got polio as a kid. Her grandmother forced marched her in the forests of Victoria for months and she made a full recovery. More recently, she was a bit skeptical of the covid vaccines but I kept reminding her of her experience with polio, she relented and is now fully vaxxed.

Edited by ozimoron
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
5 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Covid kills many but by no means close to all infected.

It appears that the death toll from Covid is much higher than previously thought, and I am all for vaccines, having been born in the late forties and brought up when polio was rampant and tuberculosis was around, as well as having many other vaccinations, so I'm with you on the vaccination front, and the following is of interest: –

 

14.9 million excess deaths associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021
New estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO) show that the full death toll associated directly or indirectly with the COVID-19 pandemic (described as “excess mortality”) between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2021 was approximately 14.9 million (range 13.3 million to 16.6 million).  


https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2022-14.9-million-excess-deaths-were-associated-with-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-2020-and-2021
 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

papa is old, 73.

& obese.

Very afraid of the mRNA stuff.

Had covid twice,

last July and in January.

Both times, took Ivermectin at first symptoms and

quickly cleared up.

Conformation bias, I guess ...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, xylophone said:

It appears that the death toll from Covid is much higher than previously thought, and I am all for vaccines, having been born in the late forties and brought up when polio was rampant and tuberculosis was around, as well as having many other vaccinations, so I'm with you on the vaccination front, and the following is of interest: –

 

14.9 million excess deaths associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021
New estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO) show that the full death toll associated directly or indirectly with the COVID-19 pandemic (described as “excess mortality”) between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2021 was approximately 14.9 million (range 13.3 million to 16.6 million).  


https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2022-14.9-million-excess-deaths-were-associated-with-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-2020-and-2021
 

From your post:

"It appears that the death toll from Covid is much higher than previously thought"

 

From your link:

"Excess mortality includes deaths associated with COVID-19 directly (due to the disease) or indirectly (due to the pandemic’s impact on health systems and society). Deaths linked indirectly to COVID-19 are attributable to other health conditions for which people were unable to access prevention and treatment because health systems were overburdened by the pandemic."

 

So your post should read:

"It appears that the death toll from the pandemic is much higher than previously thought".

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

On Friday June 17, the journal Andrology published a peer-reviewed paper showing large decreases in sperm counts among men after the second dose of Pfizer’s mRNA Covid jab.

Based on counts from men who donated sperm to three fertility clinics in Israel, this finding is devastating - medically and politically.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.13209

Be informed at all times.

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-fertility-idUSL1N2T01TQ

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reviewing the attached report, maybe you can make a more informed decision about taking the mRNA injection.

 

Summary key points:

mRNA Covid vaccines offer essentially no defense against Omicron only months after a booster shot, according to a major new study from British researchers.

 

Both antibody and T-cell protection are nearly non-existent,  according to what the British researchers discovered.

In an even more worrisome development, when vaccinated but previously uninfected people suffer breakthrough Omicron infections, their T-cell response is biased toward earlier versions of Sars-Cov-2 - not to the Omicron variant that has actually infected them.

In other words, the mRNA shots appear to permanently wrongfoot the immune systems of people who receive and bias them toward producing T-cells to attack variants that no longer exist - even though they never were infected with those variants at all.

 

 

https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/science.abq1841

science.abq1841.pdf

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/24/2022 at 7:01 PM, thailandbeachisland said:

But maybe if you weren't idiot enough to follow the sheeple and didn't get covid or did not die, you should wonder if it's really useful to inject an outdated poison ?

 

You seem to be longing for a Herman Cain award. 

 

Even today, unvaccinated people die from Covid. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2022 at 9:53 AM, xylophone said:

Absolutely, because in a myriad of controlled scientific/medical studies, ivermectin has been shown to be ineffective against Covid 19.

 

But then again you will always find someone championing this antiparasitic drug because they want to believe in it, and don't want to be vaccinated for whatever reason.

 

Pleased that you recovered anyway.

 

PS. You recovered because your immune system was able to fight off the virus and you could have had a mild version. Confirmation bias is when one looks for reasons to find and believe that ivermectin works........when studies show that is doesn't.

You seem to be unaware of the myriad of studies attesting to the effectiveness go Iver vs C19.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...