Jump to content

Ketanji Brown Jackson sworn in as first black woman on the U.S. Supreme Court


onthedarkside

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Earlier you made the accusation of selection on the basis of ‘affirmative action’.

 

Now you object to the predominance of candidates being selected who attended the two top law schools in the US.

 

Entry to these law schools is extremely competitive, not so many other law schools.

 

Perhaps you would like to see ‘affirmative action’ in favor of less academically gifted applicants.

Well, when Biden came out with a list of potential Justices who were ALL the same in sex and race, what is one to think?

 

As for other law schools being beneath Yalevard, that is quite debatable. The top tier schools are remarkably similar.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

I am not sure the headline is accurate. Justice Brown cannot actually say what a "woman" is, so by simple logic you cannot say that she is one. Indeed, calling her one may be a micro-aggression.  You need to be careful these days not to make such assumptions. 

Declined to ask an obvious baiting question by an imbecile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Declined to ask an obvious baiting question by an imbecile.

Or perhaps declined out of fear of being pilloried by the Woke Left? The answer is of course simple. A woman is an adult human female.  What is so hard about that?

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hanaguma said:

Your evidence being.......

Your opening series of posts on this thread.
 

Your new found objections based on alma mater do not ring true, given the nature of your earlier posts. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Your opening series of posts on this thread.
 

Your new found objections based on alma mater do not ring true, given the nature of your earlier posts. 

Well, out with it. Why do you think I objected?  Stop dancing around the turd. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Or perhaps declined out of fear of being pilloried by the Woke Left? The answer is of course simple. A woman is an adult human female.  What is so hard about that?

Her "woke" view of what a woman is could somehow disqualify her from the court?

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

...and in the rush to be the first to get their virtue signalle, Good Morning America managed to step on their own crank.Screen-Shot-2022-06-30-at-6.47.03-PM.png

 

 

Care to provide a scintilla of evidence that her appointment is virtue signalling or that she is somehow less qualified than Trump's picks?

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Well, out with it. Why do you think I objected?  Stop dancing around the turd. 

I already did so in an earlier post. 
 

Another poster has been blunter than myself. 
 

I’m sorry but I just don’t find your change of tack credible. 

It is what it is. 

 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mac Mickmanus said:

Was She chosen solely for her race and gender or was She the actual best qualified person for the job ?

Any evidence at all that she wasn't qualified? Any evidence that the last three picks were better qualified? Waiting...

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

I already did so in an earlier post. 
 

Another poster has been blunter than myself. 
 

I’m sorry but I just don’t find your change of tack credible. 

It is what it is. 

 

Sorry, I am a thickie. Refresh my memory. What exactly are you accusing me of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Care to provide a scintilla of evidence that her appointment is virtue signalling or that she is somehow less qualified than Trump's picks?

The virtue signalling is on the part of the 'news' media, who in their rush to look appropriately woke published a wildly inaccurate and unintentionally hilarious tweet.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hanaguma said:

Sorry, I am a thickie. Refresh my memory. What exactly are you accusing me of?

 

1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:

Ahh, poor you. A white man wasn’t chosen. Has that upset your philosophies …?

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

Any evidence at all that she wasn't qualified? Any evidence that the last three picks were better qualified? Waiting...

I have no idea, that is why I asked the question .

If I knew the answer, I wouldn't have asked the question 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...