Hanaguma Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 35 minutes ago, Lacessit said: Just like Trump did with his choices. Only he was virtue signalling to the fundamentalist white Christians. The difference may be that Trump was smart enough to NOT actually voice his reasons. Biden, for his 50 years of experience in Washington, could not do so. He had to, for various reasons, explicitly telegraph what he was doing. There were political debts to be paid, and Biden paid them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVENKEEL Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, ozimoron said: Just like "I like beer" is a fine role model? Your humor went over my head I'm afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozimoron Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 Just now, EVENKEEL said: Your humor went over my head I'm afraid. It wasn't humorous, most people are horrified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 7 minutes ago, ozimoron said: They don't already have role models? They need more at the expense of black women who have never had any? You really can't get the point can you? Why does a role model need to be the same colour as you ? Judges are also there to judge , it isn't their job to be role models 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVENKEEL Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 (edited) 12 minutes ago, ozimoron said: It wasn't humorous, most people are horrified. oh, Edited July 1, 2022 by EVENKEEL 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, ozimoron said: It wasn't humorous, most people are horrified. What are most people horrified about ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ozimoron Posted July 1, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted July 1, 2022 (edited) 30 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said: What are most people horrified about ? A lying scum bag like Kavanaugh on the bench. Apparently, Brett Kavanaugh made a promise to US Senator Susan Collins, the Maine Republican who says she’s pro-choice, that he would not vote to overturn Roe if appointed to the Supreme Court. This is getting a lot of attention, because Collins is getting a lot of attention. She said she believed he wouldn’t go there. https://www.rawstory.com/the-supreme-courts-illegitimacy-is-accelerating/ Edited July 1, 2022 by ozimoron 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 2 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said: Could you be more specific ? What are the "basic constitutional rights and freedoms based upon their gender " which have been denied to Females ? Denied the right to vote is an example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jingthing Posted July 1, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted July 1, 2022 27 minutes ago, Hanaguma said: The difference may be that Trump was smart enough to NOT actually voice his reasons. Biden, for his 50 years of experience in Washington, could not do so. He had to, for various reasons, explicitly telegraph what he was doing. There were political debts to be paid, and Biden paid them. Trump.did state his intent to kill Roe v Wade.with his court picks. Did you somehow miss that? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 (edited) 35 minutes ago, ozimoron said: Just like "I like beer" is a fine role model? Never underestimate the power of rich straight Christian white mens tears. Edited July 1, 2022 by Jingthing 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted July 1, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted July 1, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said: As shes a judge, she should be honest and truthful at all times and give her opinion on certain subjects , Judges shouldn't avoid giving an opinion because they dont want to upset certain people . She should air her opinion, rather than refusing to answer She should stick to what’s relevant and not rise to politicized baiting. And when she does this we get outrage from the rightwing. Edited July 1, 2022 by Chomper Higgot 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 2 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said: I do agree that it was a an appalling situation in 1960's segregated USA , but that is a long time ago and a different generation . You would be peeved if a woman got promoted for the sole reason she was a woman and you missed out because you are male . That situation is very likely to have happened in this promotion "to a top Judge) , three woman got nominated for the sole reason they were female , which means its quite probable that some males missed out on being nominated and promoted , because they weren't female They were not ‘nominated for the sole reason they are women’, stop making stuff up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: She should stick to what’s relevant and not rise to politicized baiting. And when she does this we get outrage from the rightwing. She was concerned about upsetting the left wing by stating what a woman was . There would have been outrage from certain groups , is she answered the question honestly 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: You asked for an example of people being denied their Constitutional rights based on Gender, I did just that. Now, is Justice Brown Jackson qualified for the job? Yes, she is fully qualified . She fully met all the requirements for the position , as set by Biden . Qualified on both requirements Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozimoron Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said: Yes, she is fully qualified . She fully met all the requirements for the position , as set by Biden . Qualified on both requirements Exactly as Trump's picks met his requirements as set by the Federalist Society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkk Brian Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: She should stick to what’s relevant and not rise to politicized baiting. And when she does this we get outrage from the rightwing. Exactly. Some focus on just one aspect of her reply and miss the most important part in my opinion, which was: "as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law, and I decide.' In other words, she said context matters – which is true in both biology and society. I think that's a pretty good answer for a judge" Edited July 1, 2022 by Bkk Brian 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said: Yes, she is fully qualified . She fully met all the requirements for the position , as set by Biden . Qualified on both requirements That'a a lie. She was fully qualified as a judge. I consider your attacks racist. As if many black women weren't fully qualified. Edited July 1, 2022 by Jingthing 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said: Exactly. Some focus on just one aspect of her reply and miss the most important part in my opinion, which was: "as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law, and I decide.' In other words, she said context matters – which is true in both biology and society. I think that's a pretty good answer for a judge" Excellent, but it doesn’t dent the ‘outrage’. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 4 minutes ago, ozimoron said: Exactly as Trump's picks met his requirements as set by the Federalist Society. You keep going off topic and talking about Trump . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 4 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said: Exactly. Some focus on just one aspect of her reply and miss the most important part in my opinion, which was: "as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law, and I decide.' In other words, she said context matters – which is true in both biology and society. I think that's a pretty good answer for a judge" It's a great answer but its way too intelligent for the low information right wing culture warriors. Their current number one political scapegoat is transgender women. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 7 minutes ago, Jingthing said: That'a a lie. She was fully qualified as a judge. I consider your attacks racist. As if many black women weren't fully qualified. Biden only stated two requirements and she fully qualified for both of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lacessit Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 49 minutes ago, Hanaguma said: The difference may be that Trump was smart enough to NOT actually voice his reasons. Biden, for his 50 years of experience in Washington, could not do so. He had to, for various reasons, explicitly telegraph what he was doing. There were political debts to be paid, and Biden paid them. You may be right, although Trump obviously was not going to offend half the voting base of America by stating he was appointing justices who would overturn abortion, keep guns, and discriminate against minorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said: Biden only stated two requirements and she fully qualified for both of them So you actually thought he meant he might pick a black female burger flipper? Stop insinuating that this new justice is not a very qualified jurist. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 6 minutes ago, Lacessit said: You may be right, although Trump obviously was not going to offend half the voting base of America by stating he was appointing justices who would overturn abortion, keep guns, and discriminate against minorities. Uh huh 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 34 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said: She was concerned about upsetting the left wing by stating what a woman was . There would have been outrage from certain groups , is she answered the question honestly How do you know what her motives were, did she tell you? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 33 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said: Exactly. Some focus on just one aspect of her reply and miss the most important part in my opinion, which was: "as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law, and I decide.' In other words, she said context matters – which is true in both biology and society. I think that's a pretty good answer for a judge" She wasnt asked to make a judgement though, she was asked her personal opinion 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 24 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said: Biden only stated two requirements and she fully qualified for both of them But you said earlier ‘Sole’ reason. Hence my suggestion you stop making stuff up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said: She wasnt asked to make a judgement though, she was asked her personal opinion Which was irrelevant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: But you said earlier ‘Sole’ reason. Hence my suggestion you stop making stuff up. I do apologise for my mistake , I should have said "the two reasons" , rather than the "sole reason" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkk Brian Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 4 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said: She wasnt asked to make a judgement though, she was asked her personal opinion I didn't say she was asked to make a judgement though........... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now