Jump to content

How do you cope with skyrocketing premiums from health insurers?


DUS

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Sure. But did you know that 12 years ago?

Of course he did not. None of us knows if or when we will need insurance, and having had no claims till now in no way means you won't have a major claim tomorrow.

 

The statistical likelihood of a claim rises exponentially  as you age Which is why insurance premiums do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Just like me with Medicare in US --  It's there if I go back. But I might not be in a stable sufficient condition to fly to Bangkok let alone back to USA.

Medicare in Australia has devil in the detail. True, healthcare is free. However, if the condition is classed as elective surgery, a patient could be waiting in pain for 1-2 years before getting the surgery done.

OTOH, with private health cover, I can be on the operating table within 2 - 4 weeks of landing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sheryl said:

Easily 3 - 5 million in a private hospital (depending on type of operation needed etc).

 

 

I don't know what the statistics are now, years ago survival rates after surgery were no better than tossing a coin, because the surgery tended to spread the cancer cells elsewhere.

Personally, at my age, rather than facing surgery plus chemo for an uncertain outcome and huge expense, I would rather pull the plug for the sake of my heirs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I don't know what the statistics are now, years ago survival rates after surgery were no better than tossing a coin, because the surgery tended to spread the cancer cells elsewhere.

Personally, at my age, rather than facing surgery plus chemo for an uncertain outcome and huge expense, I would rather pull the plug for the sake of my heirs.

There are not,  and never have been,  statistics on survival rates for "cancer surgery" per se . Cancer is not one disease, but many, and it exists in different stages ranging from completely localized to regional spread to distant metastasis. Survival rates differ greatly according to type of cancer and also its stage.  In most types if cancer,   prognosis for full cure with surgery is high if the cancer is still localized. 

 

Benefits of chemo also vary enormously depending on type and stage  of cancer. There are some types of cancer which are completely  curable by chemo alone . Others where chemo given at certain stages together with surgery significantly improve chances of full cure.  And yes, cases of advanced cancer where the benefit is just a fews months more of life. In which case one might indeed want  to consider  carefully whether worth it. 

 

Certainly no readon to assume that any cancer treatment you might need would be of uncertain  benefit.

 

And, of course, cancer is just one of many, many, many things that might lead to significant medical expense.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sheryl said:

Easily 3 - 5 million in a private hospital (depending on type of operation needed etc).

 

 

not my experience sheryl. colon resection at BCH less than 1m as was chemo programme at ram chiang mai. 

Burst appendix emergency op this new year at Ram Chiang Mai plus 7 days inpatient recovery, 150k. Seemed good value to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was also insured for the first 20 years in Thailand.
And very well!
Had unfortunately, also some hospitalizations, but all went well.
But when with over 60 years the insurance companies increased the premiums partly exorbitant, I canceled the last!
It was the AETNA.
On my written request, I got the information that it would be usual to adjust the premiums by about 5% annually & a surcharge if an unfavorable damage history.
So for me from 75 years no longer affordable! From 80 years even less!
In addition, in the event of damage everywhere information is obtained! Hospitallers / doctors and previous insurance!
So that in a for the insurance, more expensive case of damage can be assumed that is not regulated!
The secret is called: "Not made pre-contractual health data".
And there can be found almost always something to which the last disease is due ????
In addition, some large international health insurance have terminated all contracts in Thailand years ago and are no longer here on the market!
So now I have the Non O/A health insurance,which although only covers 600.000.-THB with 200.000.-THB excess!!!
The advantage is', 24/7 available, all in Thai!
In addition still an accident insurance over 300.000.-THB
That should be enough for an emergency!?
In the last 10 years I have saved a good 1.8 million THB, which I have just not paid to health insurance, which should possibly be enough?
Thai KV,s can increase your premiums after each claim up to 35% and also exclude this disease from the insurance in the future!!!
So in old age without previous illness is simply almost impossible, and these are just generally excluded !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sheryl said:

There are not,  and never have been,  statistics on survival rates for "cancer surgery" per se . Cancer is not one disease, but many, and it exists in different stages ranging from completely localized to regional spread to distant metastasis. Survival rates differ greatly according to type of cancer and also its stage.  In most types if cancer,   prognosis for full cure with surgery is high if the cancer is still localized. 

 

Benefits of chemo also vary enormously depending on type and stage  of cancer. There are some types of cancer which are completely  curable by chemo alone . Others where chemo given at certain stages together with surgery significantly improve chances of full cure.  And yes, cases of advanced cancer where the benefit is just a fews months more of life. In which case one might indeed want  to consider  carefully whether worth it. 

 

Certainly no readon to assume that any cancer treatment you might need would be of uncertain  benefit.

 

And, of course, cancer is just one of many, many, many things that might lead to significant medical expense.

 

 

 

 

You may be right. However, if I was to have Stage 4 esophageal cancer, which usually is not detected until it has reached that stage, I doubt surgery and chemo would do much more than fatten the wallets of hospitals and doctors.

I also remember reading somewhere metastasis of smaller tumors is promoted by removal of a primary tumor. Perhaps chemo is supposed to address that eventuality.

OTOH, I have been a bladder cancer survivor for 16 years, so it depends, as you say, on the type of cancer. And luck of the draw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

I don't know what the statistics are now, years ago survival rates after surgery were no better than tossing a coin, because the surgery tended to spread the cancer cells elsewhere.

Personally, at my age, rather than facing surgery plus chemo for an uncertain outcome and huge expense, I would rather pull the plug for the sake of my heirs.

Big talk but i can assure you when the big C diagnosis comes things look different its a basic human instinct to want to survive, I know cos i have been there which is why people talking rubbish annoy me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Boyn said:

Big talk but i can assure you when the big C diagnosis comes things look different its a basic human instinct to want to survive, I know cos i have been there which is why people talking rubbish annoy me.

Perhaps you missed out on reading skills, I have been there too. Continue to be annoyed, because I don't give a damn about your opinion.

You'd rather suffer from terminal cancer for months, than end your life peacefully? Be my guest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/28/2022 at 10:52 AM, Chris.B said:

Don't worry about being insured over 70. You will either be priced out of the market or you will be refused cover for health reasons. ☹️

 

1 of the reasons i return to my E.U. country .....and as no longer a Thai resident i can have 3 months full  covering insurrance from my home country as a tourist, including repatriation dead or alive ..., for max period of 3 months, ...this just included for the normal 86 euro a year .....

A Calculation quick made ...to become back  just only tourist to Thai

Thanks to my nanny state country...????

Edited by david555
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, david555 said:

1 of the reasons i return to my E.U. country .....and as no longer a Thai resident i can have 3 months full  covering insurrance from my home country as a tourist, including repatriation dead or alive ..., for max period of 3 months, ...this just included for the normal 86 euro a year .....

A Calculation quick made ...to become back  just only tourist to Thai

Thanks to my nanny state country...????

For 500 euro, I have one year policy, 180 days cover travel home, come back new 180 days, full cover and repatriation as well. No age restriction,

 

travel insurance applies to everyone, regardless of age. The only limitation is the accident cover (one-off payment in the event of medical disability and death), where the cover is adjusted with age. After the age of 70, the compensation is reduced, and after the age of 75, coverage ceases

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Hummin said:

For 500 euro, I have one year policy, 180 days cover travel home, come back new 180 days, full cover and repatriation as well. No age restriction,

 

travel insurance applies to everyone, regardless of age. The only limitation is the accident cover (one-off payment in the event of medical disability and death), where the cover is adjusted with age. After the age of 70, the compensation is reduced, and after the age of 75, coverage ceases

Lile i said 1 of the reasons....i am on my way to 75 ....however in good health ...but that does not change the Thai insurrances policy's ....????

Edited by david555
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has surprised me as I get older now at 65.  I am an American just started Medicare, which itself is not dirt cheap, but OK once I stop making money as they base premiums on income.  Having spent a lot of time in Thailand and planning to semi retire there very very soon, I have kept an eye on Thai health insurance.  It can come in very hand when abroad for 6 months and unable to get back to the States for treatment.  Medicare supposedly reimburses emergency services if over seas, but not much knowledge about that from anybody that every got that to work.  I wanted to have some Thai insurance while abroad, but am still pondering it.  I would never rely or have to rely on Thai health insurance so not a big issue at this point, but I have read enough to believe that having thai insurance can come in very handy.  Feelings for full retiree and expats that have to rely on Thai insurance. 

 

Mandatory or not, living in another country without insurance is a dangerous game.  the old days of self insuring are very risky, and if serious conditions arise, will break you.

 

My best suggestion is take the highest deductible possible as an attempt to lower the premiums.  The idea is to avoid cataclysmic massive expenses and catastrophic costs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

You may be right. However, if I was to have Stage 4 esophageal cancer, which usually is not detected until it has reached that stage, I doubt surgery and chemo would do much more than fatten the wallets of hospitals and doctors.

I also remember reading somewhere metastasis of smaller tumors is promoted by removal of a primary tumor. Perhaps chemo is supposed to address that eventuality.

OTOH, I have been a bladder cancer survivor for 16 years, so it depends, as you say, on the type of cancer. And luck of the draw.

my dad got bladder cancer.  He had been peeing blood and finally went to the doctor.  quick diagnosis on Friday.  Doctor said it is one of the most aggressive cancers.  had surgery through his Penis on Monday.  All good.  No conditions or symptoms the rest of his life 14 years on

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, beau thai said:

not my experience sheryl. colon resection at BCH less than 1m as was chemo programme at ram chiang mai. 

Burst appendix emergency op this new year at Ram Chiang Mai plus 7 days inpatient recovery, 150k. Seemed good value to me.

As I said, depends on type  of surgery.  Lung resections etc cost considerably more than simple hemicolectomy. Chemo costs depend on the drug with newer agents bring especially expensive.  What your specific treatment for one type of cancer cost  does not represent the upper limit of what treatment for any type of cancer can cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chris.B said:

The Chemo can be administered at a state hospital.

 

And can still be very costly. How much, depends on the drug needed. Some of the newer drugs may not even be available at a govt hospital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gk10012001 said:

my dad got bladder cancer.  He had been peeing blood and finally went to the doctor.  quick diagnosis on Friday.  Doctor said it is one of the most aggressive cancers.  had surgery through his Penis on Monday.  All good.  No conditions or symptoms the rest of his life 14 years on

You don't say whether your dad had BCG immunotherapy, which with a more than 90% success rate is still one of the most effective cancer treatments. I remember the procedure well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After 18 years of private insurance in Thailand, my paid claims are roughly 40% of my total paid-in premiums.

 

I know that would not square with the  I-am-way-ahead-of -the-game self-insured folks, but given all the other advantages of a million US$ per year coverage, it's good enough for me.

Edited by jerrymahoney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, internationalism said:

Find the best local governmental secondary care hospital, which is university associated. So they speak english, have equipment and doctors doing scientific research in their field, so you have a chance to meet even professors.

This.........????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sheryl said:

And can still be very costly. How much, depends on the drug needed. Some of the newer drugs may not even be available at a govt hospital.

Some of the older Chemo drugs could still be effective while being cheaper?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Lacessit said:

You don't say whether your dad had BCG immunotherapy, which with a more than 90% success rate is still one of the most effective cancer treatments. I remember the procedure well.

no chemicals.  Just a pure cut out.  Some post surgery pain meds that's about all.  This was back in 2006

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gk10012001 said:

no chemicals.  Just a pure cut out.  Some post surgery pain meds that's about all.  This was back in 2006

Coincidentally, that was when I had my first surgery. I have had a couple since; however, the urologist did not seemed to be concerned about the recurrences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the problem with health insurance.

If you look at it logically, of course the older you get the chances of you actually needing it increase, hence insurance policy costs will escalate.

 

Even in the US with our f><?ed up system we call it quits at 65 and you get Medicare and you're out of the insurance market.

 

In Thailand as an expat you just gotta suck it up, that insurance is based on risk, andthe older you get that risk increases, as do the premiums

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, GinBoy2 said:

This is the problem with health insurance.

If you look at it logically, of course the older you get the chances of you actually needing it increase, hence insurance policy costs will escalate.

 

Even in the US with our f><?ed up system we call it quits at 65 and you get Medicare and you're out of the insurance market.

 

In Thailand as an expat you just gotta suck it up, that insurance is based on risk, andthe older you get that risk increases, as do the premiums

yeah.  not many other options.  If reasonably healthy and have not chronic recurring conditions, go for the largest imaginable deductible to reduce your premiums.  My goal always was just to insure against the  bankroll busting major illnesses.  Knock on wood, now at 65 literally have never been to a hospital when I was paying for medical.  In the Air Foce they yanked my wisdom teeth and that's been about it.  Broke an arm as a kid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, gk10012001 said:

yeah.  not many other options. 

The standard Part B premium amount in 2022 is $170.10

 

https://www.medicare.gov/your-medicare-costs/part-b-costs

 

If you don't take Part B, and are willing to put up with a possible Part B enrollment penalty, or have a waiver for such penalty, you have $2040 per year to put toward health insurance in Thailand.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...