Jump to content

Red Bull Heir Escapes Cocaine Charge, Only Reckless Driving Charge Left


webfact

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, 2baht said:

I think most TVF members would be smart enough NOT to crash their Porsche into a police officer on a motorcycle in a drunken, cocaine fueled stupor in the first place!

Which members do you think drive Porsches and why did you mention that brand?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sambum said:
3 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

TVF myth, I don't believe it.  Not one single photo of him in Thailand, not one.

And you think that the reason for that is due to the fact that he hasn't been here, or that the media have been "warned off"?

So you have evidence that he has been here, have you?  Opinions or speculation is not evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

Not seen a photo of him outside of Thailand for a few years either, no one knows which country he's hiding in, although obviously not Thailand

Probably because no one outside Thailand is interested and, even if there were new photos of him, what good would it do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

Its always fun to see the self righteous and outraged  TVF  members getting their knickers in a twist over this story, 

But I wonder, how many of you , if involved in a similar situation, and with similar wealth and options available. to you would actually behave any differently 

Does that include yourself?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Spock said:

For a start, they could boycott Red Bull, but I bet every second taxi driver is swilling it down with not a care in the world for the evil creatures that produce the product.

Vorayuth has nothing to do with the Red Bull company directly, never mind the production of it, he just happens to be a nephew of one of the owners.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Spock said:
2 hours ago, kcpattaya said:

Amazing how many people here seem to know and understand much more about this case than the average bystander.

What is this supposed to mean?

It means exactly what it says.

Edited by Liverpool Lou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Robbie2618 said:

In many countries you simply would be tried in court in absentia, if you don't show up you pretty much get convicted. There is no need to let it simply run out of time. Unless of course that was the plan.

Trial in absentia has only ever applied to politicians in Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Probably because no one outside Thailand is interested and, even if there were new photos of him, what good would it do?

Aside from BBC world, CNN, AP news and all the other major international media outlets that have covered it many times for their international readers. Plus red notice may give you a hint why there are no photos

Edited by Bkk Brian
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Vorayuth has nothing to do with the Red Bull company directly, never mind the production of it, he just happens to be a nephew of one of the owners.

And nobody outside of the Asean Now forum really give a toss about him either.

 

Its only grumpy old men here getting their panties in a twist.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

And nobody outside of the Asean Now forum really give a toss about him either.

 

Its only grumpy old men here getting their panties in a twist.

Well wear boxers then.................????

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Interpol have issued a red notice and Vorayuth was never reported to be using a false passport.

Dual citizenship.

 

Khun Boss first went to Dubai and spent time with Thaksin.

 

Think about.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tomacht8 said:

If a defendant deliberately evades his trial by fleeing for many many years, there is no reason to allow him the benefits of the statute of limitations.

There is every reason, the law accommodates it, SoL start from the date the crime was committed.

 

2 hours ago, tomacht8 said:

A legally binding judgment - in the name of the people - should then also be possible in his absence.

Maybe it should be but, legally, it isn't.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the posts quoting  'money talks' 

So why not all those who feel personally about this fiasco (Thais and falang) have a collection and offer it up as a reward ....

It wouldn't take much for him to get a good kicking! Obviously more money more of a kicking!

Just a thought.

Because that's the only justice this little spoilt brat is going to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, alyx said:

5 years to go and he will be a free man

But, to be honest, he is not the only one to have ducked justice

Justice is available to all Thais. However the richer you or your family are, the better justice you can buy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Interpol have issued a red notice and Vorayuth was never reported to be using a false passport.

Bah!  Interpol doesn't issue the notice, it is the country that issues Red Notices.  If you have checked Interpol's website over these many years and searched for Thailand Red Notices, you would note that the Thais never seemed to have bothered to issue one for him.

Countries can't apprehend anyone if there isn't a warrant or request out.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tomacht8 said:

The defendant deliberately caused the delay in the verdict by fleeing for several years. Logically, this would then also have to cause the duration of the statute of limitations to be interrupted. Unfortunately, this causal logic does not apply in Thai jurisprudence.

This case got nowhere near a verdict, it didn't even get to court.  It is not logical to suggest that the statute of limitations that starts at the time of the commission of a crime has been interrupted.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...