EVENKEEL Posted October 12, 2022 Share Posted October 12, 2022 I want to know when videos of HB will be allowed. Comedy gold they are. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted October 12, 2022 Author Share Posted October 12, 2022 A post from an unapproved source has been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post heybruce Posted October 12, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted October 12, 2022 14 hours ago, bocaBob said: Biden family overseas financial activities will be revealed soon for public viewing after the GOP controls congress in Jan 2023 and the planned investigations of the oversight committee with subpoena powers focus on Hunter Biden & the Biden family to determine if Joe Biden is compromised. Everything (including potential nothing burgers) will be shown during televised investigations with witness’s under oath testifying before congress. Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz, James Comer et al, will pose the hard questions and get to the truth real quick. The American public has a right to know if the government, including Biden are corrupt. Mark it on your calendars. The hypocrisy of those who insisted Trump had no need to reveal his vast international financial affairs and potential conflicts of interest but who now insist the unfounded speculation of Biden financial affairs justifies congressional investigation is staggering. 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted October 12, 2022 Share Posted October 12, 2022 6 hours ago, bocaBob said: Transparency, truth, facts, it should be a priority for all. Surely you don't have a problem with the truth? Joe Biden is an elected govt official working for the people and owes nothing less than full transparency to the people. If a prima facia case of the Biden pay for play scheme is brought forth during congressional oversight investigations of Hunter Biden, people have right to know. "Transparency, truth, facts, it should be a priority for all." Tell that to Trump and his supporters. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mac Mickmanus Posted October 12, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted October 12, 2022 7 minutes ago, heybruce said: "Transparency, truth, facts, it should be a priority for all." Tell that to Trump and his supporters. Try and forget about Trump 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post heybruce Posted October 12, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted October 12, 2022 39 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said: Try and forget about Trump Try to remember that the people calling for transparency and investigations of any unfounded accusation against President Biden are the same ones who defended Trump's "right" to keep his business and White House dealings secret. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post thaibeachlovers Posted October 13, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted October 13, 2022 On 10/12/2022 at 8:17 AM, SunnyinBangrak said: Why would Biden have needed to hire teams of lawyers? He had the entire deep state and mainstream media working dishonestly to protect him. Do you remember this? The countries top 50 intelligence experts colluding to push an entirely false narrative to shield the Biden family from the law and to misinform the public just before an election. People were banned from the internet for stating the facts about this, even our oldest newspaper, banned for stating inconvenient truths. Really really evil stuff. Even though the FBI had the laptop, dishonest lefties were trying to shut down the discussion by making nonsensical comments about the emails lacking "metadata" to goad censors(or give them a plausible excuse) into censoring a factual story that did not suit the democrat narrative. Just a really low point in America's history. "Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say" https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276 Given the absolute certainty and mountain of supporting evidence for the felony crime that Hunter lied on his firearm license by stating he was not a drug addict, when his own memoir and emails stated he was, and also he himself stated he was in frequent interviews. And so dangerous his throwing a gun into a waste basket in public. Nobody denies he committed a felony here. It's shocking behaviour, but no desire whatsoever to mete out any justice to the Bidens. Just forget it. Well said. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onthedarkside Posted October 13, 2022 Share Posted October 13, 2022 More off-topic and trolling posts have been removed along with replies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post heybruce Posted October 13, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted October 13, 2022 On 10/11/2022 at 9:17 PM, SunnyinBangrak said: Why would Biden have needed to hire teams of lawyers? He had the entire deep state and mainstream media working dishonestly to protect him. Do you remember this? The countries top 50 intelligence experts colluding to push an entirely false narrative to shield the Biden family from the law and to misinform the public just before an election. People were banned from the internet for stating the facts about this, even our oldest newspaper, banned for stating inconvenient truths. Really really evil stuff. Even though the FBI had the laptop, dishonest lefties were trying to shut down the discussion by making nonsensical comments about the emails lacking "metadata" to goad censors(or give them a plausible excuse) into censoring a factual story that did not suit the democrat narrative. Just a really low point in America's history. "Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say" https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276 Given the absolute certainty and mountain of supporting evidence for the felony crime that Hunter lied on his firearm license by stating he was not a drug addict, when his own memoir and emails stated he was, and also he himself stated he was in frequent interviews. And so dangerous his throwing a gun into a waste basket in public. Nobody denies he committed a felony here. It's shocking behaviour, but no desire whatsoever to mete out any justice to the Bidens. Just forget it. "Why would Biden have needed to hire teams of lawyers? He had the entire deep state and mainstream media working dishonestly to protect him." Allow me to state the obvious: The "deep state" is a myth. You can not even define what you mean by it, and you certainly can't prove its existence. It's just something you want to believe in, so you do. It is your religion. Tragically, people who follow the deep state religion often believe bizarre things--lizard people, blood drinking pedophiles, etc. The number of people who believe this nonsense is frightening. The fact that they vote based on these beliefs is dangerous. 1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said: Well said. Another adherent to the deep state religion. The Justice Department is investigating Hunter Biden. If there is enough evidence to prosecute him, he will be charged and prosecuted. Just like Trump. That's not evidence for or against a deep state, its how the system works. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted October 13, 2022 Author Share Posted October 13, 2022 Off-topic post removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted October 13, 2022 Author Share Posted October 13, 2022 Off-topic posts removed. The topic is about Hunter Biden. Henceforth, troll posts WILL earn suspensions. You have been warned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onthedarkside Posted October 14, 2022 Share Posted October 14, 2022 More off topic posts and replies to those have been removed. I'd strongly encourage posters here to heed the prior warning above given by another moderator, as follows: "Off-topic posts removed. The topic is about Hunter Biden. Henceforth, troll posts WILL earn suspensions. You have been warned." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onthedarkside Posted October 14, 2022 Share Posted October 14, 2022 A post with a misleading, inaccurate news report headline has been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael87 Posted October 14, 2022 Share Posted October 14, 2022 (edited) from the quoted news source: "Hunter Biden has long been a target of scrutiny from conservatives, who have alleged that his overseas business dealings indicate a pattern of corruption. Republicans have vowed to investigate him in the House of Representatives if they win a majority of seats in next month's midterm congressional elections." https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63166809 The tax problems for Hunter are the least of the problems he and his ... father and family will face when congress puts Tony Bobulinski on the stand and the banks that flagged 150 Biden bank transactions! Edited October 15, 2022 by onthedarkside unsupported/unsubstantiated claim removed 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placeholder Posted October 14, 2022 Share Posted October 14, 2022 12 hours ago, michael87 said: from the quoted news source: "Hunter Biden has long been a target of scrutiny from conservatives, who have alleged that his overseas business dealings indicate a pattern of corruption. Republicans have vowed to investigate him in the House of Representatives if they win a majority of seats in next month's midterm congressional elections." https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63166809 The tax problems for Hunter are the least of the problems he and his ... father and family will face when congress puts Tony Bobulinski on the stand and the banks that flagged 150 Biden bank transactions! As I posted earlier Bobulinski made allegations about the Bidens that he claims were supported by data in 3 mobile phones. Reporters from Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal were given access to those phones. They found nothing that tied Joe Biden to any of Bobulinski's allegations. As for banks flagging transactions, by itself that means very little. It's not uncommon where large amounts of cash are transferred. Banks do this to protect themselves from charges of abetting money laundering. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted October 14, 2022 Share Posted October 14, 2022 12 hours ago, michael87 said: from the quoted news source: "Hunter Biden has long been a target of scrutiny from conservatives, who have alleged that his overseas business dealings indicate a pattern of corruption. Republicans have vowed to investigate him in the House of Representatives if they win a majority of seats in next month's midterm congressional elections." https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63166809 The tax problems for Hunter are the least of the problems he and his ... father and family will face when congress puts Tony Bobulinski on the stand and the banks that flagged 150 Biden bank transactions! Lol! Hunter is currently investigated by a Prosecutor appointed by Trump. What can the house find that the current investigation cannot find. In brief, the Republucans have nothing, they just want to make a show. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g man Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 (edited) The noose around the neck of Hunter Biden and the Biden family is tightening. This is not going to end well for the Bidens. They are in it up to their eyeballs and it's only a matter of time now before the whistle-blowers seal their fate. FBI has 'voluminous evidence' of Hunter Biden's 'potential criminal conduct': Whistleblowers https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china Edited October 17, 2022 by onthedarkside off topic and unsubstantiated comments removed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhys Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 Like CS45 this LOON will pull the same strategy and receive the same pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, g man said: The noose around the neck of Hunter Biden and the Biden family is tightening. This is not going to end well for the Bidens. They are in it up to their eyeballs and it's only a matter of time now before the whistle-blowers seal their fate. FBI has 'voluminous evidence' of Hunter Biden's 'potential criminal conduct': Whistleblowers https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china If it weren't coming from Grassley, it would be more credible! ???? Anyway, if Hunter has committed any offense, let's convict him. No problem. Edited October 17, 2022 by candide 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunnyinBangrak Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 2 hours ago, candide said: If it weren't coming from Grassley, it would be more credible! ???? Anyway, if Hunter has committed any offense, let's convict him. No problem. And perhaps investigate exactly why these foreigners were paying him all those millions of $s? I will go right ahead and make the assumption that the people paying Hunter the millions of $ expected to get something in return for their money. I wonder what that was? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placeholder Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 10 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said: And perhaps investigate exactly why these foreigners were paying him all those millions of $s? I will go right ahead and make the assumption that the people paying Hunter the millions of $ expected to get something in return for their money. I wonder what that was? They probably did expect something in return for Hunter being the son of Joe Biden. The issue is whether they got anything. The attempt to tie Biden to a quid pro quo in the Burisma case has long since been exploded. Except possibly for those who trust Rudolph Giuliani's 2 criminal witnesses who were working for Oleg Deripaska, who was the middleman between Paul Manafort and the Russian govt. He is currently fighting extradition to the United States. Their relationship recovered, however, and Deripaska has been described as "Putin's favorite industrialist".[119] Leaked U.S. diplomatic cables from 2006 described Deripaska as "among the 2–3 oligarchs Putin turns to on a regular basis" and "a more-or-less permanent fixture on Putin's trips abroad".[120] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleg_Deripaska 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunnyinBangrak Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 (edited) 5 hours ago, placeholder said: They probably did expect something in return for Hunter being the son of Joe Biden. The issue is whether they got anything. The attempt to tie Biden to a quid pro quo in the Burisma case has long since been exploded. Except possibly for those who trust Rudolph Giuliani's 2 criminal witnesses who were working for Oleg Deripaska, who was the middleman between Paul Manafort and the Russian govt. He is currently fighting extradition to the United States. Their relationship recovered, however, and Deripaska has been described as "Putin's favorite industrialist".[119] Leaked U.S. diplomatic cables from 2006 described Deripaska as "among the 2–3 oligarchs Putin turns to on a regular basis" and "a more-or-less permanent fixture on Putin's trips abroad".[120] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleg_Deripaska We know they got something in return. We have known for years. Contrary to repeated false claims by the left that Joe never met or discussed business with Hunter or Hunter's associates, White House records show this to be a lie. Nothing to fear, nothing to hide is frequently written on this forum. Might it be applicable here? "Joe Biden hosted a White House meeting with two Chinese energy executives with ties to his son Hunter back when he was vice president in 2014, records show. The president, who still insists he never spoke to Hunter about his son’s overseas business dealings, met the two executives from Wanxiang — a major Chinese company — in the West Wing on July 25, 2014, according to White House visitor logs." https://nypost.com/2022/08/05/joe-biden-met-chinese-energy-execs-with-ties-to-hunter-in-2014/ "Two of Hunter’s Mexican business associates, Miguel Aleman Velasco and Miguel Aleman Magnani visited the West Wing on Feb. 26, 2014, according to the Obama White House visitor logs, and Joe was later photographed with Hunter giving Velasco and Magnani a tour of the White House Brady Press Briefing room." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-met-14-hunters-business-associates-vice-president So now the democrat big lie is thoroughly debunked. Joe Biden DID meet with these people the left swore he did not meet, and let us remember so sure were the left that Joe did not meet any of these people(although we already knew he did thanks to Hunter's laptop) that they censored truthful statements and only permitted lies that helped the democrat party. That is very sad indeed. Time is right to ask why were these meetings taking place? Why the need to lie and deny them? Edited October 18, 2022 by onthedarkside misinfo claims removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted October 17, 2022 Share Posted October 17, 2022 6 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said: And perhaps investigate exactly why these foreigners were paying him all those millions of $s? I will go right ahead and make the assumption that the people paying Hunter the millions of $ expected to get something in return for their money. I wonder what that was? I'm sure these people expected something in return. However I'm not aware of Hunter Biden delivering anything of significance. That makes Hunter a hustler, just like Trump. "Grip and grin" photo ops with a Vice President does not count as anything of substance. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post placeholder Posted October 17, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted October 17, 2022 5 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said: We know they got something in return. We have known for years. Contrary to repeated false claims by the left that Joe never met or discussed business with Hunter or Hunter's associates, White House records show this to be a lie. Nothing to fear, nothing to hide is frequently written on this forum. Might it be applicable here? "Joe Biden hosted a White House meeting with two Chinese energy executives with ties to his son Hunter back when he was vice president in 2014, records show. The president, who still insists he never spoke to Hunter about his son’s overseas business dealings, met the two executives from Wanxiang — a major Chinese company — in the West Wing on July 25, 2014, according to White House visitor logs." https://nypost.com/2022/08/05/joe-biden-met-chinese-energy-execs-with-ties-to-hunter-in-2014/ "Two of Hunter’s Mexican business associates, Miguel Aleman Velasco and Miguel Aleman Magnani visited the West Wing on Feb. 26, 2014, according to the Obama White House visitor logs, and Joe was later photographed with Hunter giving Velasco and Magnani a tour of the White House Brady Press Briefing room." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-met-14-hunters-business-associates-vice-president So now the democrat big lie is thoroughly debunked. Joe Biden DID meet with these people the left swore he did not meet, and let us remember so sure were the left that Joe did not meet any of these people(although we already knew he did thanks to Hunter's laptop) that they censored truthful statements and only permitted lies that helped the democrat party. That is very sad indeed. Time is right to ask why were these meetings taking place? Why the need to lie and deny them? the justice department during the Trump administration had plenty of time to investigate Joe Biden. Apparently, they came up with nothing. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g man Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Grassley wrote. "That same document notes that as of July 2017 the money still had not been transferred and James Biden considered calling CEFC officials and threatening to withdraw Biden family support from future deals.” Hmmm, I do believe Joe Biden is a member of the Biden family. Maybe he (James Biden) can confirm this statement about Biden family support under oath to congress, just to clarify and misunderstanding and Joe's role in all this. Wow, could be big problems for the Bidens. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g man Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 2 hours ago, placeholder said: The issue is whether they got anything. exactly what congress needs to determine from the Biden's during confessional oversight investigations planned for a GOP controlled house. Maybe Hunter Biden can avoid a suboeana to testify if he is under indictment for tax and firearm felonies. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placeholder Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 31 minutes ago, g man said: Grassley wrote. "That same document notes that as of July 2017 the money still had not been transferred and James Biden considered calling CEFC officials and threatening to withdraw Biden family support from future deals.” Hmmm, I do believe Joe Biden is a member of the Biden family. Maybe he (James Biden) can confirm this statement under oath to congress. Wow, could be big problems for the Bidens. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-criminal-fbi-investigation-whistleblower-ukraine-china What we have here is a spelling problem. J-A-M-E-S is not how you spell Joe. Also, James considered it but apparently didn't actually do it. I'm not sure that "considering" would qualify as a crime. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post placeholder Posted October 18, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted October 18, 2022 21 minutes ago, g man said: exactly what congress needs to determine from the Biden's during confessional oversight investigations planned for a GOP controlled house. Maybe Hunter Biden can avoid a suboeana to testify if he is under indictment for tax and firearm felonies. I think they should subpoena Joe Biden's tax returns...oh wait..they don't have to. They're already in the public domain. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post LosLobo Posted October 18, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted October 18, 2022 (edited) 5 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said: And perhaps investigate exactly why these foreigners were paying him all those millions of $s? I will go right ahead and make the assumption that the people paying Hunter the millions of $ expected to get something in return for their money. I wonder what that was? Perhaps also investigate exactly why the Saudi's and Chinese gave Jared and Ivanka Kushner $2 billion and exclusive fast-track trademarks. Unlike you I base my posts on real evidence and not assumptions. Edited October 18, 2022 by LosLobo 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 5 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said: We know they got something in return. We have known for years. Contrary to repeated false claims by the left that Joe never met or discussed business with Hunter or Hunter's associates, White House records show this to be a lie. Nothing to fear, nothing to hide is frequently written on this forum. Might it be applicable here? "Joe Biden hosted a White House meeting with two Chinese energy executives with ties to his son Hunter back when he was vice president in 2014, records show. The president, who still insists he never spoke to Hunter about his son’s overseas business dealings, met the two executives from Wanxiang — a major Chinese company — in the West Wing on July 25, 2014, according to White House visitor logs." https://nypost.com/2022/08/05/joe-biden-met-chinese-energy-execs-with-ties-to-hunter-in-2014/ "Two of Hunter’s Mexican business associates, Miguel Aleman Velasco and Miguel Aleman Magnani visited the West Wing on Feb. 26, 2014, according to the Obama White House visitor logs, and Joe was later photographed with Hunter giving Velasco and Magnani a tour of the White House Brady Press Briefing room." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-met-14-hunters-business-associates-vice-president So now the democrat big lie is thoroughly debunked. Joe Biden DID meet with these people the left swore he did not meet, and let us remember so sure were the left that Joe did not meet any of these people(although we already knew he did thanks to Hunter's laptop) that they censored truthful statements and only permitted lies that helped the democrat party. That is very sad indeed. Time is right to ask why were these meetings taking place? Why the need to lie and deny them? So, if true (remember It's from NYPost and Fox News) they got a meeting and a handshake. Big deal! Have they got a procurement from the government which Joe could have influenced? No. Have they got a suspect authorisation Joe could have influenced? No! In brief, you have nothing! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
.thumb.png.76be522b3b43e7458166b9dac9e422ed.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now