12 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

More posters in this thread have already cried ‘election fraud!!’ But when asked to deliver even the tiniest bit of evidence for their claim, it always remains strangely quiet. I wonder why that is? 

You know why but I will put it here for the record: because it is not allowed.

 

Should I PM you some evidence of election fraud?

1 minute ago, rattlesnake said:

You know why but I will put it here for the record: because it is not allowed.

 

Should I PM you some evidence of election fraud?

Probably best not to, it may get mixed up with your flat earth theories.

 

However real evidence does not need to be hidden via PM.

The New York Post is having a field day, or rather, field week.  Murdoch is sending a pretty clear message to the loser.  A few days ago, they had a full "Trumpty Dumpty" front page, which was posted on here, and then, two days ago, before Trump came out with this, they ran a piece speculating on just what his "big announcement" would be:

 

 

Trump begging Jared, Ivanka to join him for campaign launch: sources (nypost.com)

 

3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

However real evidence does not need to be hidden via PM.

I did not expect a different answer.

 

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

 

You keep on supporting the current thing, it's working wonders.

13 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Trump signing some more sweet deals with his Saudi friends.

 

Trump Family Signs Deal With Saudi Real Estate Developer

The Trump family has struck a deal with a Saudi-based real estate company to license its name to a housing and golf complex that will be built in Oman, renewing a swirl of questions about former President Donald Trump’s mixing of politics and business.

Trump had close ties with the Saudi government during his tenure in the White House, authorizing billions of dollars in weapons sales and defending the government there after the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. His son-in-law, Jared Kushner, secured a $2 billion investment from a fund led by the Saudi crown prince six months after leaving the White House.

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-family-signs-deal-saudi-131115618.html

Looks like ill-gotten and illicit funds which were given in exchange for something promised to the Saudi Crown prince........I am sure folks will be along comparing the Biden sons payment....

3 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

I did not expect a different answer.

 

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

 

You keep on supporting the current thing, it's working wonders.

But you failed to add my full answer.............lol

 

Yes justice and courts and juries tend to get to the bottom of the truth, 64 court cases so far have found no evidence of election fraud, but maybe you didn't send them that PM

16 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

You know why but I will put it here for the record: because it is not allowed.

 

Should I PM you some evidence of election fraud?

If you had any credible evidence I’m sure it would be allowed here.

11 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

I did not expect a different answer.

 

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

 

You keep on supporting the current thing, it's working wonders.

Supporting what, an agenda? The truth of the fact he has many many cases filed against him? or that it is all a witch hunt.  

2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

But you failed to add my full answer.............lol

 

Yes justice and courts and juries tend to get to the bottom of the truth, 64 court cases so far have found no evidence of election fraud, but maybe you didn't send them that PM

I tend to omit irrelevant information for the purpose of clarity. My mention of flat Earth theories was irony in response to another user's comment. As a high-IQ member of this community, I am sure you detected that.

1 minute ago, rudi49jr said:

If you had any credible evidence I’m sure it would be allowed here.

If he has it let him provide the links that are truly verifiable.  As far as I now there were only a few minor issues found in all of the investigations, and they were not of a glaring issue.

2 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

If you had any credible evidence I’m sure it would be allowed here.

You keep on thinking that, sometimes I almost envy the comfort of your stances.

1 minute ago, ThailandRyan said:

If he has it let him provide the links that are truly verifiable.  As far as I now there were only a few minor issues found in all of the investigations, and they were not of a glaring issue.

The truth will come out eventually and I will get back to you in due time about it.

7 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

I tend to omit irrelevant information for the purpose of clarity. My mention of flat Earth theories was irony in response to another user's comment. As a high-IQ member of this community, I am sure you detected that.

Ant vaxxers, election deniers, flat earths are all conspiracy theorists, part and parcel of the package, ie no evidence apart from what they say they can send in PM's

12 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Supporting what, an agenda? The truth of the fact he has many many cases filed against him? or that it is all a witch hunt.  

14 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

The truth will come out eventually and I will get back to you in due time about it.

So you have none, or are you saying the investigations were faked

 

45 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

You know why but I will put it here for the record: because it is not allowed.

 

Should I PM you some evidence of election fraud?

Here, let me correct that post for you:

 

You know why but I will put it here for the record: because it is not allowed pure unadulterated BS.

 

If you really believe "The Big Lie" after hordes of Republicans have gone over each state election with a fine tooth comb and found basically nothing then you should seek help.......seriously.

4 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

So you have none, or are you saying the investigations were faked

 

I have already explained this. Please refer to my signature quote if you want to see it phrased differently. I will get back to you when we reach the third stage, before that we would just be bickering which I have no interest in.

26 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

I tend to omit irrelevant information for the purpose of clarity. My mention of flat Earth theories was irony in response to another user's comment. As a high-IQ member of this community, I am sure you detected that.

You must forgive us but since you are a Big Lie believer it's kinda hard to figure out what your BS believing level is at.

6 minutes ago, Phoenix Rising said:

Here, let me correct that post for you:

 

You know why but I will put it here for the record: because it is not allowed pure unadulterated BS.

 

If you really believe "The Big Lie" after hordes of Republicans have gone over each state election with a fine tooth comb and found basically nothing then you should seek help.......seriously.

Thanks for the advice. Any insights on what my ailment(s) may be?

2 minutes ago, Phoenix Rising said:

You must forgive us but since you are a Big Lie believer it's kinda hard to figure out what your BS believing level is at.

Yeah I noticed subtlety is not your strong point.

54 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

You know why but I will put it here for the record: because it is not allowed.

 

Should I PM you some evidence of election fraud?

Send it to Rudolph Giuliani. He couldn't find any.

52 minutes ago, ballpoint said:

The New York Post is having a field day, or rather, field week.  Murdoch is sending a pretty clear message to the loser.  A few days ago, they had a full "Trumpty Dumpty" front page, which was posted on here, and then, two days ago, before Trump came out with this, they ran a piece speculating on just what his "big announcement" would be:

 

 

Trump begging Jared, Ivanka to join him for campaign launch: sources (nypost.com)

 

Murdoch: always the same subtle way! ????

Only the target is changed.

 

I guess MAGA folks must feel so stressed from cognitive dissonance! ????

1 hour ago, rattlesnake said:

You know why but I will put it here for the record: because it is not allowed.

 

Should I PM you some evidence of election fraud?

What you could do is post it anyway and see if it gets taken down, and why.

18 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Send it to Rudolph Giuliani. He couldn't find any.

I seem to remember him saying he kept it under his bed. But then apparently it somehow mysteriously disappeared, since he failed to produce it. 

5 minutes ago, billd766 said:

What you could do is post it anyway and see if it gets taken down, and why.

Done it countless times, even got banned three times. Stated reason: "misinformation".

2 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

Done it countless times, even got banned three times. Stated reason: "misinformation".

Did it ever occur to you that it may well have been 'misinformation'? Especially if it could not be verified.

 

I am sure that the mods on here do a good job in verifying dubious links.

1 hour ago, Bkk Brian said:

But you failed to add my full answer.............lol

 

Yes justice and courts and juries tend to get to the bottom of the truth, 64 court cases so far have found no evidence of election fraud, but maybe you didn't send them that PM

Not just 64 court cases, but among those were (very) conservative Trump appointed judges, and even they concluded there was no evidence of election fraud, or they refused to even consider the cases brought before them and kicked them out straight away.

But you can throw as much real and verifiable evidence at hardcore MAGA Trump cult followers as you want, they will never in a million years accept it. They live in their own reality and have their own truths, completely free of facts, and there is no way in hell they are ever going to accept anything from anyone who doesn’t belong to their cult. 

3 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Did it ever occur to you that it may well have been 'misinformation'?

Never, but then again I am not the sharpest tool in the box, am I? I mean I really feel dwarfed on this forum, you guys truly are an inspiration.

1 hour ago, rattlesnake said:

The truth will come out eventually and I will get back to you in due time about it.

I agree, the truth will come out eventually.

 

In this case, "eventually" occurred between Nov 1st and Dec 31st, 2020.

 

It was then repeatedly verified by later, deeper investigations in several Republican-controlled States, every one of which verified the previously published outcomes.

27 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

Never, but then again I am not the sharpest tool in the box, am I? I mean I really feel dwarfed on this forum, you guys truly are an inspiration.

“If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em”.