Jump to content

Biden says he'll renew push for assault weapons ban following spate of mass shootings


Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Free photos of Gun

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden said Thursday he would make a renewed effort to enact a ban on assault-style rifles following a wave of mass shootings that have again put a spotlight on the nation’s gun laws.

Speaking to reporters during a visit to a fire station on Thanksgiving morning, the president reiterated his long-standing argument that such weapons are a societal menace and should not be sold.

“The idea that we still allow semi-automatic weapons to be purchased is sick,” he said while greeting firefighters in Nantucket, Massachusetts, where he and his family are spending the Thanksgiving holiday. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-say-renew-push-assault-weapons-ban-spate-mass-shootings-rcna58664

NBC-News-Logo - Sikh Coalition

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

The US didn't have 600 mass shootings a year, 20 years ago.

Yet strangely the homicide rate has been dropping since 1990.  From 9.3/100,000 people to a low of 4.4 in 2014. Ticking up recently but still showing a decrease o f 30% over the period.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Hanaguma said:

Yet strangely the homicide rate has been dropping since 1990.  From 9.3/100,000 people to a low of 4.4 in 2014. Ticking up recently but still showing a decrease o f 30% over the period.

Despite all those rapists and murderers crossing over from south of the border. How do you figure?

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

"Thankfully, weapons typically referred to as assault weapons or modern sporting rifles are not used in the majority of firearm homicides. However, when they are used, they have an outsized impact on injury and death."

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/testimony-hunter-2022-07-20

Yes, and.... 

 

they are used in 3% of firearms homicides.  Of course they are more lethal than handguns when used.  ALL rifles and shotguns display these characteristics. They are not exclusive to what people call "assault weapons". 

 

"Assault weapons" use the same ammunition as regular hunting rifles and semi auto rifles.  Unless you want to ban EVERY firearm that shoots a .223 round or 5.56mm or higher, this is a pointless argument to make. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Hanaguma said:

Statistic show that more people were beaten to death with bare hands in 2021 than were killed by rifles (including assault weapons). Twice as many were stabbed to death.  Do we ban hands and knives too?

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/195325/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-weapon-used/

You should look at that graph again. It's not nearly so unequivocal as you make it out to be.

Posted

Estimates show that approximately one-third of public mass shooting events include the use of an assault weapon, and nearly 40 percent involve a high-capacity magazine.11 When an assault weapon and/or a high-capacity magazine is used in a public mass shooting, nearly 14 times as many people are injured, and twice as many people are killed.12 Not only are there more injuries when assault weapons are used but the types of injuries are far worse. The combined effect of the weapon’s muzzle velocity and the ballistics of the round most commonly.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Testimony - Hunter - 2022-07-20.pdf

 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Credo said:

Having been not-too-seriously wounded in a shooting many years ago and having been caught in the crossfire of an assault style rifle, all I can say is that it's extremely hard to take any evasive action facing an assault-style rifle.  

 

Any gun that has the ability to do what the assault-style does has no place anywhere except a war zone.  They have no purpose except to kill large numbers of people very quickly.   

How would you say that is different than a hunting rifle or sport rifle that uses the same ammunition?

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said:

Estimates show that approximately one-third of public mass shooting events include the use of an assault weapon, and nearly 40 percent involve a high-capacity magazine.11 When an assault weapon and/or a high-capacity magazine is used in a public mass shooting, nearly 14 times as many people are injured, and twice as many people are killed.12 Not only are there more injuries when assault weapons are used but the types of injuries are far worse. The combined effect of the weapon’s muzzle velocity and the ballistics of the round most commonly.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Testimony - Hunter - 2022-07-20.pdf

 

So how does that stat break down? There are two variables- the weapon and the high capacity magazine.  Weapons not considered "assault weapons" can use high capacity magazines.   Also how would that differentiate from a standard semi auto hunting rifle (except for the potential high capacity magazine)?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

AR-15-style rifles have been the weapon of choice for the killers responsible for the deadliest mass shootings in American history, including the recent mass murders in Buffalo, New York, and Uvalde, Texas.6

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO00/20220727/115024/HHRG-117-GO00-20220727-SD005.pdf

...and so..... what is your point?  Handguns have been the weapon of choice for most murderers in the past century.  Your argument is akin to saying that, in order to stop drunk driving, we should ban whisky. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

How would you say that is different than a hunting rifle or sport rifle that uses the same ammunition?

Since I'm pretty sure that you can get semi-auto hunting rifles, I would imagine that only magazine capacity would make a different.  Obviously a 5-shot mag is going to cause a much slower rate of fire than a 30-shot mag.  If you can get a 30-shot semi-auto hunting rifle, it's probably not going to be that different. 

 

Perhaps people would opt for an "assault style" rifle due to manoeuvrability, but would simply opt for a hunting rifle were the former to be banned somehow.

Posted
Just now, Hanaguma said:

...and so..... what is your point?  Handguns have been the weapon of choice for most murderers in the past century.  Your argument is akin to saying that, in order to stop drunk driving, we should ban whisky. 

No but we do have drunk driving laws to stop it as much as we can.

 

You're now on ignore for the remainder of this OP. Your logic is shot............????

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

"Assault rifles", specifically the AR-15 if that's what it's called, have become weapons of domestic terror (or more specifically, weapons wielded by domestic terrorists, who it seems these days tend to be right wing at least if not full Maga).  That is why any right-thinking society would have banned them in America's position.  

Arguments about the relatively low statistical prevalence of deaths by percentage sit well with 'don't wear seat-belts as people sometimes die when they are wearing them, most people die of cancer so we shouldn't bother with other diseases', and 'it's not as bad as it used to be' style arguments.

Edited by Slip
missed a word
  • Thumbs Up 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...