Special counsel shows signs of ramping up Trump investigation

[candide]

1 hour ago, dotcalm said:

Inside House Republicans’ Plan to Investigate Hunter Biden as a 'National Security Threat'

https://time.com/6218879/hunter-biden-investigations-james-comer-house-republicans/

 

Don't see any planned investigations into Trump's sphere in the vein of being a "national security threat"

 

Give it a rest, stop with the 2 tiers of justice, go investigate real crimes and stop the persecution  of the most investigated and never charged politician in American history. American's have more and bigger issues to manage.

But, but...Hunter!????

[placeholder]

3 hours ago, dotcalm said:

The only hint of desperation comes from the democrats and their weaponized police and DoJ. They are desperate to stop Trump for a reason, any guess why they fear Trump so much and need to attack, persecute him instead of leaving him alone, to golf and spend his billions?? Why is that? Do the dems fear his 2024 election victory?

Another way to know someone's got nothing is when they go after motivation, rather than link to evidence

Edited March 1, 2023 by placeholder

[dotcalm]

43 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Another way to know someone's got nothing is when they go after motivation, rather than link to evidence

You are right again, they got nothing on Trump, zero, nada. And that's tough for the opposition to swallow every day and who's lives are controlled, consumed by seeing Trump is prosecuted.

 

Now you can look forward with much anticipation, when Tucker Carlson and FOX news dump the recently released Jan 6 videos which will show "insurrection" perhaps, NOPE, it would have been leaked by now. The FOX news video release could very well be another HUGE win for Trump and a major blow to the narrative pushed by the J6 presentation committee.

[dotcalm]

3 hours ago, candide said:

But, but...Hunter!????

Exactly, there is potential of serious criminal involvement of the Biden clan, enough to warrant an investigation and reference to same by the Times.

 

No such investigations of the Trump family be a "threat to national security", unless I missed it?

 

“We’re not investigating Hunter Biden for political reasons,” Comer says. “We’re investigating Hunter Biden because we believe he’s a national security threat, who we fear has compromised Joe Biden.” He adds, “The Hunter Biden investigation is slowly becoming the Joe Biden investigation.”

https://time.com/6218879/hunter-biden-investigations-james-comer-house-republicans/

[placeholder]

7 minutes ago, dotcalm said:

You are right again, they got nothing on Trump, zero, nada. And that's tough for the opposition to swallow every day and who's lives are controlled, consumed by seeing Trump is prosecuted.

 

Now you can look forward with much anticipation, when Tucker Carlson and FOX news dump the recently released Jan 6 videos which will show "insurrection" perhaps, NOPE, it would have been leaked by now. The FOX news video release could very well be another HUGE win for Trump and a major blow to the narrative pushed by the J6 presentation committee.

You tried the gambit of equating Trumpls conduct with Bidens in regard to documents. That failed.

You bring up the irrelevant case of Hunter Biden

You make predictions about the future as though that was evidence.

You've got nothing.

[dotcalm]

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

You tried the gambit of equating Trumpls conduct with Bidens in regard to documents. That failed.

You bring up the irrelevant case of Hunter Biden

You make predictions about the future as though that was evidence.

You've got nothing.

Wait and see, there is nothing today, but maybe tomorrow, Trump, nah, Biden, we'll see. And, let the J6 video's set the record straight. There may be some bombshell developments, maybe the FBI will chime in. Don't be so impatient. You know it's got to be juicy, embarrassing, incriminating, etc when pelsoi, and all J6'ers tried to bury and seal the videos in the archives for the next 50 years. You are in favor of or in fear of transparency, truth?

The videos could bring clarity into the events of Jan 6th and especially to the DNS bomb planter who has managed somehow to elude the FBI since Jan 2021.

 

Get your popcorn, it could be an eye opener, so much that CBS News, CNN, Politico, ProPublica ABC, Axios, Advance, Scripps, the Los Angeles Times, and Gannett all signed a letter sent to congressional leadership demanding access to the same video material released to Tucker Carlson at FOX news.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/media-organizations-demand-jan-6-videos-mccarthy-shared-with-fox-news/ar-AA17TYTq

 

In the interest of fairness and transparency speaker McCarthy did say this:

'The House speaker said in a Wednesday interview with The New York Times that he expects to make the footage more widely available after Carlson uses the material."

[dotcalm]

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

Another way to know someone's got nothing is when they go after motivation, rather than link to evidence

What exactly "got nothing", what exactly is your message? What is "nothing", this is a discussion that for some reason triggers such a telling defensive posture in your retorts. You just don't like to hear what I write so you resort to "you got nothing". Ok, fine , I got nothing, so sit back and keep enjoying my nothing, or ignore it if it's nothing.

[candide]

30 minutes ago, dotcalm said:

Wait and see, there is nothing today, but maybe tomorrow, Trump, nah, Biden, we'll see. And, let the J6 video's set the record straight. There may be some bombshell developments, maybe the FBI will chime in. Don't be so impatient. You know it's got to be juicy, embarrassing, incriminating, etc when pelsoi, and all J6'ers tried to bury and seal the videos in the archives for the next 50 years. You are in favor of or in fear of transparency, truth?

The videos could bring clarity into the events of Jan 6th and especially to the DNS bomb planter who has managed somehow to elude the FBI since Jan 2021.

 

Get your popcorn, it could be an eye opener, so much that CBS News, CNN, Politico, ProPublica ABC, Axios, Advance, Scripps, the Los Angeles Times, and Gannett all signed a letter sent to congressional leadership demanding access to the same video material released to Tucker Carlson at FOX news.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/media-organizations-demand-jan-6-videos-mccarthy-shared-with-fox-news/ar-AA17TYTq

 

In the interest of fairness and transparency speaker McCarthy did say this:

'The House speaker said in a Wednesday interview with The New York Times that he expects to make the footage more widely available after Carlson uses the material."

So, again, you've got nothing.

[dotcalm]

18 minutes ago, candide said:

So, again, you've got nothing.

So again, I "got nothing" but let me say this. Tucker Carlson, FOX News have the Jan 6th the videos, for all to see. I probably wouldn't care much about these J6 videos but the fact that the corporate media and democrats ran with the insurrection narrative and vehemently  opposed the release of the videos due to security concerns and not in the public interest, there may be another story in the J6 video tapes, and if there is we can all get to see it after FOX news presents it. But because I "got nothing" has nothing to do with the coming storm the J6 videos may reveal, or not. But at least we get to see this J6 "nothing videos" that took a court order, GOP speaker McCarthy's action  and Tucker Carlson's publication along with FOX News contribution we can now see the left's proclaimed "insurrection" or that it was a big "nothing", except for any newly revealed details hidden until Tucker got the goods.

[dotcalm]

43 minutes ago, candide said:

So, again, you've got nothing.

Okay, but try not to let it bug you too much.

[candide]

22 minutes ago, dotcalm said:

So again, I "got nothing" but let me say this. Tucker Carlson, FOX News have the Jan 6th the videos, for all to see. I probably wouldn't care much about these J6 videos but the fact that the corporate media and democrats ran with the insurrection narrative and vehemently  opposed the release of the videos due to security concerns and not in the public interest, there may be another story in the J6 video tapes, and if there is we can all get to see it after FOX news presents it. But because I "got nothing" has nothing to do with the coming storm the J6 videos may reveal, or not. But at least we get to see this J6 "nothing videos" that took a court order, GOP speaker McCarthy's action  and Tucker Carlson's publication along with FOX News contribution we can now see the left's proclaimed "insurrection" or that it was a big "nothing", except for any newly revealed details hidden until Tucker got the goods.

It's not the "left proclaimed insurrection". There has been an official investigation, and offenders have been judged by courts of law. Some of them even pleaded guilty. They had lawyers to defend them, and these lawyers also had access to the videos, among other evidence produced.

 

Not to mention the obvious conflict of interest by McCarthy, who officially provided the footage only to a politically friendly media, which has a proven record of knowingly diffusing big lies.

[ozimoron]

Watch live: Garland testifies before Senate panel at oversight hearing

 

 

[ozimoron]

Legal experts reacted with shock to new reporting from the Washington Post claiming that some FBI agents were "afraid" of executing a search warrant at former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort to retrieve top-secret government documents.

 

According to the Post's report, FBI agents battled with Department of Justice prosecutors over how to investigate the former president's handling of classified material, as they feared becoming targets of the former president and his allies if they conducted a lawful search of his property.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-fbi-2659485010/

[dotcalm]

5 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Watch live: Garland testifies before Senate panel at oversight hearing

 

 

Pay attention to the total annihilation laid on Garland during the session delivered by Josh Hawley for targeting catholic pro-life activist family in a SWAT style raid.

Classic beat-down.

https://twitter.com/townhallcom/status/1630981569165787158?s=20

 

Background of event.

https://news.yahoo.com/hawley-demands-answers-garland-fbi-201046421.html

Edited March 1, 2023 by dotcalm

[dotcalm]

4 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Legal experts reacted with shock to new reporting from the Washington Post claiming that some FBI agents were "afraid" of executing a search warrant at former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort to retrieve top-secret government documents.

 

According to the Post's report, FBI agents battled with Department of Justice prosecutors over how to investigate the former president's handling of classified material, as they feared becoming targets of the former president and his allies if they conducted a lawful search of his property.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-fbi-2659485010/

Hmm, and this too.

Prosecutors argued that new evidence suggested Trump was knowingly concealing secret documents at his Palm Beach, Fla., home and urged the FBI to conduct a surprise raid at the property. But two senior FBI officials who would be in charge of leading the search resisted the plan as too combative and proposed instead to seek Trump’s permission to search his property, according to the four people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe a sensitive investigation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/01/fbi-dispute-trump-mar-a-lago-raid/

[Tug]

6 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Legal experts reacted with shock to new reporting from the Washington Post claiming that some FBI agents were "afraid" of executing a search warrant at former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort to retrieve top-secret government documents.

 

According to the Post's report, FBI agents battled with Department of Justice prosecutors over how to investigate the former president's handling of classified material, as they feared becoming targets of the former president and his allies if they conducted a lawful search of his property.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-fbi-2659485010/

Absolutely I’m sure they were deeply concerned for their safety heck trump sent a lynch mob after pence when he finally stood up and refused to be a party to treason they are rightfully concerned Imo 

[stevenl]

17 hours ago, dotcalm said:

it's all laughable. Probably Trump is laughing at the lefties, the DoJ/FBI, spinning their wheels trying to finish him off and put a dent in MAGA. The persecution of Trump has failed at every instance, even the Georgia G jury has morphed into a <deleted>-show, humiliation.

Trump is not laughing at anything, he's a bitter old man. Even his pretend laughs are clearly fake.

[SunnyinBangrak]

2 hours ago, Tug said:

Absolutely I’m sure they were deeply concerned for their safety heck trump sent a lynch mob after pence when he finally stood up and refused to be a party to treason they are rightfully concerned Imo 

Fact check. 5 pinnochios. Trump never sent a "lynch mob" to do anything, let alone attack Mike Pence.

[placeholder]

5 hours ago, dotcalm said:

Hmm, and this too.

Prosecutors argued that new evidence suggested Trump was knowingly concealing secret documents at his Palm Beach, Fla., home and urged the FBI to conduct a surprise raid at the property. But two senior FBI officials who would be in charge of leading the search resisted the plan as too combative and proposed instead to seek Trump’s permission to search his property, according to the four people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe a sensitive investigation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/01/fbi-dispute-trump-mar-a-lago-raid/

And those 2 dissenting prosecutors were proved correct because the FBI found nothing.  And it never happened that when, prior to obtaining a search warrant the FBI asked permission to examine the contents of certain boxes at Mar a Lago, their request was denied. So it turns out that the signed statement by one of Trump's attorneys that a diligent search had been performed and no documents in violation had been found also turned out to be true. All of this and more happened in Opposite World.

[placeholder]

6 hours ago, dotcalm said:

Pay attention to the total annihilation laid on Garland during the session delivered by Josh Hawley for targeting catholic pro-life activist family in a SWAT style raid.

Classic beat-down.

https://twitter.com/townhallcom/status/1630981569165787158?s=20

 

Background of event.

https://news.yahoo.com/hawley-demands-answers-garland-fbi-201046421.html

What B.S! The FBI, went to the home of a pro-life activist who was under indictment for violating the law. He was neither arrested nor indicted for being Catholic or pro-life. And they arrested him at his home. How does that qualify as "targeting his family"?

 

Amid outcry, FBI disputes account of raid at pro-life Catholic family’s home

"Mark Houck, the founder and co-president of a men’s spiritual formation apostolate called The King’s Men, faces the possibility of 11 years in prison if convicted of violating the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, more commonly referred to as the FACE Act.

The law carries stiff penalties for those who engage in “violent, threatening, damaging, and obstructive conduct intended to injure, intimidate, or interfere with the right to seek, obtain, or provide reproductive health services,” according to the Department of Justice.

A federal indictment accuses Houck of twice assaulting a Planned Parenthood client escort, identified in the document as “B.L.,” outside a Philadelphia abortion clinic on Oct. 23, 2021.

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/252393/fbi-disputes-accounts-of-swat-raid-at-pro-life-catholic-familys-home

 

[Tug]

1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Fact check. 5 pinnochios. Trump never sent a "lynch mob" to do anything, let alone attack Mike Pence.

Uhhh oookkkkaaaa I guess that was a deep fake speech on j6 you rember that one don’t you you know the one we’re all the Trump supporters trashed the capitol all sent by trump based on a lie all fake ehh remember what he said about pence?I do 

[Eric Loh]

2 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Fact check. 5 pinnochios. Trump never sent a "lynch mob" to do anything, let alone attack Mike Pence.

He told the mob to 'fight like hell' and said something to the effect that  Pence should be hung collaborated by 2 witnesses during the Jan 6 committee investigation. Your defence of Trump is weak and utterly futile. 

[Chomper Higgot]

7 hours ago, dotcalm said:

Hmm, and this too.

Prosecutors argued that new evidence suggested Trump was knowingly concealing secret documents at his Palm Beach, Fla., home and urged the FBI to conduct a surprise raid at the property. But two senior FBI officials who would be in charge of leading the search resisted the plan as too combative and proposed instead to seek Trump’s permission to search his property, according to the four people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe a sensitive investigation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/01/fbi-dispute-trump-mar-a-lago-raid/

There comes a time when pussy footing ends.

 

Trump gets raided, just like any other person known to have removed and to be hiding Government Secret Documents would get raided.

 

Justice is getting done at last.

 

Jack be nimble, Jack be quick.

 

Edited March 2, 2023 by Chomper Higgot

[placeholder]

15 hours ago, dotcalm said:

What exactly "got nothing", what exactly is your message? What is "nothing", this is a discussion that for some reason triggers such a telling defensive posture in your retorts. You just don't like to hear what I write so you resort to "you got nothing". Ok, fine , I got nothing, so sit back and keep enjoying my nothing, or ignore it if it's nothing.

First of all, what do you mean by "defensive"? Since when is critiquing someone's comments in this forum "defensive"? Are comments that point out faults in others' arguments "defensive"? I suggest you look up what the word means.

As for "you've got nothing". I explained exactly why I wrote that. Instead of responding to my arguments, you once again resort to ...

 

'You just don't like to hear what I write so you resort to "you got nothing"'

 

So once again you resort to ascribing motivation rather than addressing arguments.

In other words, you've still got nothing.