Jump to content

Florida House passes 6-week abortion ban, expected to be signed by governor


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, placeholder said:

And punishing people is also a choice. And unforgiveable when it's so clearly hypocritical.

 

These are the 10 states without expanded Medicaid:

Wyoming, Kansas, Texas, Wisconsin, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina and Florida

All of them except Kansas, now have very harsh anti-abortion laws. And the only reason Kansas doesn't is because the citizens were allowed to vote on in a referendum to guarantee abortion rights.. (The Florida legislature has seen to it that referendums sponsored by citizens will be virtually impossible to get on the ballot. Not so for referendums authorized by the legislature)

So, no, it's not about protecting children. It's about punishing women for having sex the way they choose to have it.

 

Children Are Left Behind When States Fail to Expand Medicaid

Growing numbers of uninsured children are concentrating in states that have not expanded Medicaid.

While Medicaid expansion was designed to help 
uninsured adults who could not afford private 
insurance, the policy change also benefits children.

Extending access to Medicaid coverage for adults benefits the whole family by providing continuous access to care and improving reproductive health

https://ccf.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Kids-and-Medicaid-expansion_2-19.pdf

You keep using the word "punish", but that is not what is happening. Nobody is being punished. However, they ARE being forced to be responsible for their actions.  No woman in Florida can be made to carry a pregnancy if she doesn't want to. She has 6 weeks to decide. The men in the equation are the ones with no power. They have no say in whether or not the abortion happens, and also no say after the baby is born.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, placeholder said:

If she even knows she's pregnant inside of 6 weeks. But after 6 weeks she has no right to have an abortion in Florida except in certain constricted circumstances.

And of course it's about punishment. If it was about concern for children, these legislators would long since have passed legislation to see to it that all children in Florida have access to decent medical care. Same goes for those other states, too.

Perhaps this law will make people a bit more careful about their sexual activity then.  Have unprotected sex, use the morning after pill. Not sure? Take a pregnancy test at the first sign of a missed period.   

 

Pro abortion folks? Get moving and set up networks in Florida for women to have quick access to transportation if necessary, testing if necessary, etc.  Ball is in your court now. 

 

TBH, I think it is a bit of a tight window, but this is what the Florida legislature wants.  People can vote them out if they want in the next election. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hanaguma said:

The men in the equation are the ones with no power. They have no say in whether or not the abortion happens, and also no say after the baby is born.

Naturally you would like to change that too I assume?

 

"It takes a village" after all to agree on such private matters. Should the outcome be decided by simple majority or should it legally be unanimous in a county forum.?

Power to the people!

  • Like 1
Posted

Not only that. Just to make that more women in Florida get pregnant, the legislature is going after Planned Parenthood. by depriving them of state funding. Their excuse is that Planned Parenthood supports abortion services. However, the money from Florida goes to contraceptive and other health services. Not to abortion.

Defund Planned Parenthood? Florida is going to try.
A federal judge previously blocked part of a 2016 abortion law.

Citing the Supreme Court case that reversed Roe v. Wade, Florida’s attorney general on Wednesday filed a motion to reinstate part of a 2016 law that would have blocked state funds from going to Planned Parenthood and other organizations that perform abortions.

https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/2023/02/22/abortion-moody-desantis-planned-parenthood-clinic-funding/

 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

You are right, and many pro life people would agree. However, political reality intrudes. Much like the gun issue, where a lot of anti gun people would rather there be zero guns in America. Most people see a compromise position somewhere in the middle. 

 

This bill allows abortions up to 15 weeks for rape and incest, and also for risk of life/substantial health risk of the mother. So it is not actually a ban.  More an imposition of responsibility on people who choose to be sexually active. 

I am pro-life (and not religious) but with conditionals you mention. How often does one see a comment about Thai people not taking responsibility for their actions? Yet when it comes one's own country, the principle seems to get lost. If a person doesn't want children then they shouldn't play 'Russian roulette' with their body.

  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Tug said:

Let’s consider the opposite no need for women to suffer poverty and a dead end life because of an unplanned pregnancy humm?how about letting the lady make that choice humm?how about tracking down the ugly people who try to force their will on others separate church and state vote the bums out!

There is no reason for women to suffer that fate. They can choose not to have unsafe sex, can choose to abort their pregnancy within 6 weeks, can choose to put their baby up for adoption.  Nobody is forcing poverty on anyone. 

  • Confused 2
  • Love It 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, placeholder said:

Not only that. Just to make that more women in Florida get pregnant, the legislature is going after Planned Parenthood. by depriving them of state funding. Their excuse is that Planned Parenthood supports abortion services. However, the money from Florida goes to contraceptive and other health services. Not to abortion.

Defund Planned Parenthood? Florida is going to try.
A federal judge previously blocked part of a 2016 abortion law.

Citing the Supreme Court case that reversed Roe v. Wade, Florida’s attorney general on Wednesday filed a motion to reinstate part of a 2016 law that would have blocked state funds from going to Planned Parenthood and other organizations that perform abortions.

https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/2023/02/22/abortion-moody-desantis-planned-parenthood-clinic-funding/

 

Good. Why should the government fund them?  The money they get from govt grants just goes into a big pot, there is no way to distinguish which dollars go to which procedure or usage.  Howzabout dedicated pro abortion people pony up the cash to make up for the shortfall? Should be easy if so many people support their mission. 

  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Tug said:

Let’s consider the opposite no need for women to suffer poverty and a dead end life because of an unplanned pregnancy humm?how about letting the lady make that choice humm?how about tracking down the ugly people who try to force their will on others separate church and state vote the bums out!

Absolutely, it not only affects the women but also the children:

 

Women who are denied abortions risk falling deeper into poverty. So do their kids

"I defaulted on student loans that I was navigating," she says. She'd been studying to be a paralegal but had left without a degree. Within about a year, she also defaulted on credit card payments, which eventually led to her meager checks being garnished. At one point, she juggled three jobs — one of them full time — trying to make it all work. "It was certainly rough."

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/26/1100587366/banning-abortion-roe-economic-consequences

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 hours ago, placeholder said:

Typical punitive attitude of the right when it comes to sex.

And what this means for poor women in the region is particularly awful. They're going to have to travel farther and more expensively if they want to get an abortion. Already the costs are prohibitively high for many.

 

Condoms are cheap. And personal responsibility is free. Maybe schools could teach that instead of critical race theory?

 

Just a thought...

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, placeholder said:

Can you please share with us the evidence that Florida schools are or were teaching critical race theory? Maybe for a change you could stop making things up.  Anyway,  since the Florida schools didn't and don't teach critical race theory, there's no "instead" about it. And it's clearly a lot more to the point to teach the facts about sex and  contraception than it is to teach some general idea of personal responsibility. How would that even work? Teach fables?

 

Teach them how condoms work. Teach them that actions have consequences and you can't always rely on others to bail out your poor decisions.

 

That way you don't need dangerous, expensive medical procedures to remove unwanted unborn children from the womb.

 

Sounds like common sense to me. Prevention has to be better than "cure".

 

 

  • Confused 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Teach them how condoms work. Teach them that actions have consequences and you can't always rely on others to bail out your poor decisions.

 

That way you don't need dangerous, expensive medical procedures to remove unwanted unborn children from the womb.

 

Sounds like common sense to me. Prevention has to be better than "cure".

Most abortions are not "expensive medical procedures". They are drug induced miscarriages. The result of this law will be a return to coathangers.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Most abortions are not "expensive medical procedures". They are drug induced miscarriages. The result of this law will be a return to coathangers.

That depends on the stage of pregnancy.

 

Besides, you might want to check the original post I quoted and take up the whole "this further persecutes the poor" narrative with them.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

That depends on the stage of pregnancy.

 

Besides, you might want to check the original post I quoted and take up the whole "this further persecutes the poor" narrative with them.

I'm not interested in  your original post, only your deflection that abortions are "expensive medical procedures" which is not true in the main. Surgical abortions are mainly carried out when there are complications.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

You keep using the word "punish", but that is not what is happening. Nobody is being punished. However, they ARE being forced to be responsible for their actions.  No woman in Florida can be made to carry a pregnancy if she doesn't want to. She has 6 weeks to decide. The men in the equation are the ones with no power. They have no say in whether or not the abortion happens, and also no say after the baby is born.

Exactly!

 

They say father's shouldn't have any say whatsoever, yet they seem to expect men to support abortion. Lol

 

Why would we care, if it's none of our business?


Her body, her choice, her business. 

 

 I ain't voting for it.

 

Give fathers a say, and I'll think about it.

  • Confused 2
Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Teach them how condoms work. Teach them that actions have consequences and you can't always rely on others to bail out your poor decisions.

 

That way you don't need dangerous, expensive medical procedures to remove unwanted unborn children from the womb.

 

Sounds like common sense to me. Prevention has to be better than "cure".

 

 

image.png.69b196a9d088cc4716405f22f5f0fa2b.png

https://www.forbes.com/advisor/health-insurance/average-childbirth-cost/

 

Even if one don't have insurance, abortions cost far less:

image.png.ea288dbc2149bcf21b21a94d0c81f623.png

https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/dashboard/abortion-in-the-u-s-dashboard/

 

As for "dangerous"

The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States

The pregnancy-associated mortality rate among women who delivered live neonates was 8.8 deaths per 100,000 live births. The mortality rate related to induced abortion was 0.6 deaths per 100,000 abortions. In the one recent comparative study of pregnancy morbidity in the United States, pregnancy-related complications were more common with childbirth than with abortion.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22270271/

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...