2 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

I do not deflect from truth.

Truth to date is yet to be determined, no longer is written by the victors.

I have no qualms debating these significant and consequential matters openly, whether my viewpoint is adverse or not to otherwise opinion, I do not stoop to absorbing rhetoric for any influence.

You’re not getting this are you. The poster was claiming numerous times that babies were being killed by Israel every ten minutes. It was a lie. That is the truth and fact.

2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   I think that she might legally be wrong .

that's possible and I didn't claim she was right, just posted her opinion as many other have posted other reporters opinions, free speech

6 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

and you have come waltzing onto this topic with the only purpose of negativity and arrogance, u know nothing about me and it's better that way just try to be more understanding in the near future, bye bye

 

Well, I know enough about you to understand that you did not know that Israel does not occupy Gaza, otherwise you would not have pasted a statement from someone saying that Israel does not have the right of self defence from a territory it occupies. She is not stating an opinion, she is putting an incorrect statement forward as fact, and you believed it and are still trying to defend it. Nothing arrogant about pointing out something that is factually incorrect.

 

 

6 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

Well, I know enough about you to understand that you did not know that Israel does not occupy Gaza, otherwise you would not have pasted a statement from someone saying that Israel does not have the right of self defence from a territory it occupies. She is not stating an opinion, she is putting an incorrect statement forward as fact, and you believed it and are still trying to defend it. Nothing arrogant about pointing out something that is factually incorrect.

 

 

Unless he knew it was not true when he posted it, which would make him intellectually dishonest, at best. 

7 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

You’re not getting this are you. The poster was claiming numerous times that babies were being killed by Israel every ten minutes. It was a lie. That is the truth and fact.

You are not getting this either.

@Neeranam wasn't lying, he gave his opinion based on reports and wasn't factual.

Let me clarify:

Both, Babies and Children were/are still being killed every 10 minutes in Gaza.

 

 

 

 

 

20 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

Well, I know enough about you to understand that you did not know that Israel does not occupy Gaza, otherwise you would not have pasted a statement from someone saying that Israel does not have the right of self defence from a territory it occupies. She is not stating an opinion, she is putting an incorrect statement forward as fact, and you believed it and are still trying to defend it. Nothing arrogant about pointing out something that is factually incorrect.

 

 

The warder doesn't live in the cell with the prisoners. 

1 hour ago, Morch said:

 

You being an antisemite is not an opinion. You've posted what you've posted.

As for all opinions being valid - don't know what you were taught in university, but that's patently untrue.

Whatever

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

 

So, if we were discussing the best way to lay bricks, the carpenter's opinion is just as valid as the bricklayer's, got it. 

 

 

Ever heard the saying "thick as a brick"

11 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

You are not getting this either.

@Neeranam wasn't lying, he gave his opinion based on reports and wasn't factual.

Let me clarify:

Both, Babies and Children were/are still being killed every 10 minutes in Gaza.

 

While it may Kuhn Scotty's opinion that people under the age of 18 are babies, but that does not make it a fact or make his claims true.

 

And while you might be able to say a baby or child is killed every minute, you could not say both babies and children were being killed every ten minutes, that would just be another lie. 

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

 

While it may Kuhn Scotty's opinion that people under the age of 18 are babies, but that does not make it a fact or make his claims true.

 

And while you might be able to say a baby or child is killed every minute, you could not say both babies and children were being killed every ten minutes, that would just be another lie. 

Lying, is an "intentional distortion" of truth.

Posting upon an open forum, the currently accepted atrocities against Palestinian Children, each were being slaughtered every 10 minutes pro rata.

Reuters were the source.

 

38 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

You are not getting this either.

@Neeranam wasn't lying, he gave his opinion based on reports and wasn't factual.

Let me clarify:

Both, Babies and Children were/are still being killed every 10 minutes in Gaza.

 

 

 

 

 

Its called back tracking Paul 

Paul why are you Reguratating and dragging up old posts that was debated many pages ago its time to move forward on the thread not what we debeted before thats History.

1 hour ago, Mavideol said:

one should never assume anything unless has proof or it can turn into making an "ass of u & me"

 

Fair enough - so what do you make of her words? How do you think her arguments hold?

 

 

1 hour ago, Mavideol said:

that's possible and I didn't claim she was right, just posted her opinion as many other have posted other reporters opinions, free speech

 

She is not a a 'reporter'. That's the point. She's UN official specifically concerned with things Palestinian. Like all the previous holders of the post, she comes with preconceived pro-Palestinian views, and anti-Israeli ones.

46 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

You are not getting this either.

@Neeranam wasn't lying, he gave his opinion based on reports and wasn't factual.

Let me clarify:

Both, Babies and Children were/are still being killed every 10 minutes in Gaza.

 

 

 

 

 

When you have something to add to the topic instead of a lame attempt at trying to defend a poster  @Neeranam who was caught out lying and not for the first time. get back to me.

4 hours ago, coolcarer said:

No he was lying having been consistently addressed on it. The 40 babies thing was via a journalist, not Israel. Defection from a poster on here lying

What are you talking about consistently addressed, by whom? 

I said babies instead of children, and you go ballistic calling me a liar. I told you already I meant children. 

 

delted

13 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

Lying, is an "intentional distortion" of truth.

Posting upon an open forum, the currently accepted atrocities against Palestinian Children, each were being slaughtered every 10 minutes pro rata.

Reuters were the source.

 

Exactly. Claiming a baby is being killed every ten is intentional distortion. 

14 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

Lying, is an "intentional distortion" of truth.

Posting upon an open forum, the currently accepted atrocities against Palestinian Children, each were being slaughtered every 10 minutes pro rata.

Reuters were the source.

 

Thanks for the defence, I blocked that troll ages ago but see he's still obsessed with trying defame me, pathetic. 

You know its against forum rules to name-call Neeranam.

2 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

What are you talking about consistently addressed, by whom? 

I said babies instead of children, and you go ballistic calling me a liar. I told you already I meant children. 

You trolls are unbelievable. 

By me and other posters. you ignored it until your were addressed many times. Yes you said babies which was not true

4 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

When you have something to add to the topic instead of a lame attempt at trying to defend a poster  @Neeranam who was caught out lying and not for the first time. get back to me.

When have I ever lied? 

You can't go throwing accusations around like this. 

Unbelievable. 

Just now, Neeranam said:

When have I ever lied? 

You can't go throwing accusations around like this. 

Unbelievable. 

 

@Neeranam

 

You throw accusations at others all the time, while cowardly hiding behind that 'ignore' button.

5 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

By me and other posters. you ignored it until your were addressed many times. Yes you said babies which was not true

If I can't see people's posts, it's not ignoring, is it. 

3 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

When have I ever lied? 

You can't go throwing accusations around like this. 

Unbelievable. 

Your words.

”These extremists who think babies dying every ten minutes is not ethnic cleansing”

Lies on both counts. Babies and ethnic cleansing

Just now, Neeranam said:

If I can't see people's posts, it's not ignoring, is it. 

That is your fault and nobody elses!

14 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

What are you talking about consistently addressed, by whom? 

I said babies instead of children, and you go ballistic calling me a liar. I told you already I meant children. 

You trolls are unbelievable. 

Children meaning anyone under 18, including those fighting with hamas, yes?  

5 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

If I can't see people's posts, it's not ignoring, is it. 

 

It is, that' why it's called 'ignore'.

13 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Thanks for the defence, I blocked that troll ages ago but see he's still obsessed with trying defame me, pathetic. 

You defame yourself.

16 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

When you have something to add to the topic instead of a lame attempt at trying to defend a poster  @Neeranam who was caught out lying and not for the first time. get back to me.

 

I also think that Neeranam was not lying. You didn't explain or provide proof. It's starts to be strange that people here are labeled as liars while nothing comes close to producing any lie. Furthermore excuses are requested in exaggeration... 

6 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

If I can't see people's posts, it's not ignoring, is it. 

The very definition of ignore is ignore. This is your choice to ignore. It is also others choices to respond to you when you have been dishonest.