Jump to content

Trump can be sued over January 6 Capitol attack, US appeals court rules


CharlieH

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You don't support making healthcare affordable for everyone?

 

Oh, you support the Republican healthcare plan: "Die Quickly".

Healthcare is a personal responsibility... like rent... what kind of car you buy... whether or not you study in school... what kind of work that you do... if you need to be taken care of go back and live with mommy.

 

PS... "affordability" is an excuse used by liberal left to buy votes... instead of going to sporting events and amusement parks and buying I-phones... try paying your insurance premiums first and if the premiums are too high complain about your parties inflationary tax and spend program.  

  • Confused 3
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 300sd said:

Really! How about you tell me what upset me then. Or is it something that just festers in you little mind?

 

55555

 

So you tell me what you don't like with a will qualified lawyer getting this post? Was it Sri, Obama or both that trigger you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

 

55555

 

So you tell me what you don't like with a will qualified lawyer getting this post? Was it Sri, Obama or both that trigger you?

Ok, I thought he had never been a judge before and failed to research his history completely. I didn't think a lawyer should be placed in a top appeal judge position while never being a judge or with little experience. In any event obviously he's an Obama shill and personally I think Obama wasn't a good pres. How on that?

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2023 at 5:30 AM, Skipalongcassidy said:

And the "haters" continue to hate... as the swamp pollutes itself further they can only offer vitriol... America is sick  

Time you start to open your eyes:

 

D. Pre- and Post-Conspiracy Evidence That the Defendant and Co-Conspirators Suppressed Proof Their Fraud Claims Were False and Retaliated Against Officials Who Undermined Their Criminal Plans

E. Pre- and Post-Conspiracy Evidence of the Defendant’s Public Attacks on Individuals, Encouragement of Violence, and Knowledge of the Foreseeable Consequences

F. Post-Conspiracy Evidence of the Defendant’s Steadfast Support and Endorsement of Rioters

 

Jack Smith Drops Bombshell Filing Promising Proof Of Trump ‘Encouragement of Violence’ — And Knowledge Of ‘Consequences’ (msn.com)

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, 300sd said:

Really! How about you tell me what upset me then. Or is it something that just festers in you little mind?

Since the judge in question was well qualified for the position of Chief Justice, what bothered you about his suitability for the position?

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

Hahahahaha... Jack Smith is all you need to know that this is a scam... wait and see if he has anything to "release"... he won't... just like nancy and her failure.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Cost is one thing... quality of care comes at a higher cost... wait 1, 2, 3 years for a procedure in socialized medicine countries... no thank you.

Another Pavlovian response.

Did you even read the headline? Was about the 11 wealthiest developed Nations. If in fact those companies are socialists, that's quite an endorsement of socialism. Did you read the part about where theirr health outcomes are better?

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Hahahahaha... Jack Smith is all you need to know that this is a scam... wait and see if he has anything to "release"... he won't... just like nancy and her failure.

Jack Smith has a huge amount of evidence for which Trump will have no defense.

 

But, you don't care about facts. All you care about is worship of orange Jesus.

 

In the New York state case, Trump claimed that the prosecutor had zero evidence, but the Trump team had all the evidence. How did that work out?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Jack Smith has a huge amount of evidence for which Trump will have no defense.

 

But, you don't care about facts. All you care about is worship of orange Jesus.

 

In the New York state case, Trump claimed that the prosecutor had zero evidence, but the Trump team had all the evidence. How did that work out?

Just like the NY AD whose case is falling apart... Trump reacted to Thursday morning testimony from a defense expert witness, New York University accounting professor Eli Bartov, who reviewed the Trump financial statements at issue in the case and said he found no evidence of accounting fraud.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Hahahahaha... Jack Smith is all you need to know that this is a scam... wait and see if he has anything to "release"... he won't... just like nancy and her failure.

Try to keep up he has released loads already. Can't find it if you only listen to Trump's drivel though.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Jack Smith has a huge amount of evidence for which Trump will have no defense.

 

But, you don't care about facts. All you care about is worship of orange Jesus.

 

In the New York state case, Trump claimed that the prosecutor had zero evidence, but the Trump team had all the evidence. How did that work out?

 

If Jack Smit has to refer back to the J6 comedy hour year, that means he has (to use a popular line).....nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

If Jack Smit has to refer back to the J6 comedy hour year, that means he has (to use a popular line).....nothing. 

There is certainly a ton of material from the J6 committee that DOJ can use in the trial. For example, the attorneys who told Trump that his efforts were illegal.

 

The missing piece remains the link between groups such as the Proud Boys and the White House. The PB started marching to the Capitol before Trump gave his speech. How did they know in advance there would be an attack on the Capitol?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, heybruce said:

What a surprise. 

 

"On Friday, Bartov revealed that he has made approximately $877,500 for his expert testimony in this case — charging $1,350 per hour for about 650 hours of work. When questioned by lawyers for the state of New York about who was paying him, Bartov replied that his bank statements showed some of the money was paid by the Trump Organization and some came from Trump's Save America PAC."  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-expert-witnesses-billed-almost-900000-dollars-each-testifying-fraud-trial-new-york-city/

So... and you don't believe the other side is also being "paid"... it isn't just in Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/9/2023 at 6:41 PM, Skipalongcassidy said:

So... and you don't believe the other side is also being "paid"... it isn't just in Thailand.

Are you acknowledging that the testimony is tainted?

 

Is the other side paying hundreds of thousands for "expert witnesses"?  Please provide proof.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...