Jump to content

Biden says there's 'no question' Trump engaged in an insurrection


CharlieH

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, quake said:

What a laugh, 13 threads on the first page of this sub forum, has Trump in the tittle.

His more popular than God.

Hail,  the next president of the united states. 

 

 

trump 1.JPG

Yes, the Trump haters are drawn to any thread with Trump in the title, to see how many insults they can cram into multiple posts.

If all mention of Trump was banned there would likely be only half as many threads on this sub forum.

  • Sad 3
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Yes, the Trump haters are drawn to any thread with Trump in the title, to see how many insults they can cram into multiple posts.

If all mention of Trump was banned there would likely be only half as many threads on this sub forum.

 

No sign of Biden haters anywhere.

 

Trump haters attack Trump, Biden haters attack Trump haters.

Edited by ozimoron
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2023 at 7:01 AM, CharlieH said:

image.png

 

 

 

 

 

President Joe Biden has said there's 'no question' Donald Trump engaged in an 'insurrection' on January 6 as he sided with the Colorado Supreme Court justices who disqualified him from the 2024 ballot.

In his first public comments since the staggering ruling, Biden said it is now up to the Supreme Court to decide if Trump violated the 14th Amendment and should be barred from holding public office.

The president responded as outraged Republicans across the country vowed to kick him off their ballots as revenge for the unprecedented decision and strategists suggested it would boost Trump's chances in 2024.

 

The 4-3 decision from Democratic-appointed justices was that Trump engaged in an insurrection on January 6 and disqualified himself from running for public office.

It is the first time in history that the insurrection clause has been used to prevent a presidential candidate from appearing on a state's presidential ballot.

Biden, who beat Trump by 13 points in Colorado in 2020, avoided getting into the legal details of the case when he walked over to the press on his trip to the battleground state of Wisconsin on Wednesday.

A recent DailyMail.com poll showed Biden is ahead of Trump by five points in the swing state that will be crucial in crowning the general election winner next November.

 

FULL STORY

MAILONLINE.png

 

Joe thought they were asking about an erection... but he didn't see any young girls around

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Joe thought they were asking about an erection... but he didn't see any young girls around

 

Yes, he definitely has old man  pervy tendency's.

Sniffing a young girls hair !!! for all the world to see on camera. 

  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

And by the way.. the term "psychic" is a blanket word for All psychic abilities.. and yes, all humans have them too.  Most of us just don't refer to these abilities as being "psychic."  We actually refer to them as, "I got a Gut feeling or I got a Hunch... or "I knew that was going to happen" or I had this really weird dream that came true. Or a friend that you haven't heard from in a while pops into your head and shortly afterwards your phone rings and it's them calling you.  All of these normal everyday occurrences are psychic abilities. We all have them.  But for some people, their abilities are more developed where they can actually make a living at it... these are the ones who we call "psychics."

 

copied and pasted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Yale historian worries Supreme Court 'will make itself ridiculous' with major Trump ruling

 

Renowned Yale Prof. Timothy Snyder, who previously said Putin wants Trump to win because the former president shows our "system is rotten," spoke out about the Supreme Court's involvement in the various state-based ballot cases.

 

"I am concerned that the Supreme Court, in ruling on Trump's eligibility for office, will make itself ridiculous," Snyder said. "This is where the comic potential emerges. This Court is unlikely ever to hear again a case of such simplicity, in which the text and context of the Constitution so obviously demand an unambiguous verdict."

 

https://www.rawstory.com/yale-historian-ridiculous-supreme-court/

 

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

US historians sign brief to support Colorado’s removal of Trump from ballot

 

The 25 historians – among them James McPherson of Princeton, the pre-eminent civil war scholar – pointed to 1860s congressional debate.

 

“Senator Reverdy Johnson of Maryland, a Democratic opponent of the 14th amendment, challenged sponsors as to why section three omitted the president. Republican Lot Morrill of Maine … replied, ‘Let me call the senator’s attention to the words “or hold any office civil or military under the United States”.’ Johnson admitted his error; no other senator questioned whether section three covered the president.”

 

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/jan/28/us-historians-sign-brief-to-support-colorados-removal-of-trump-from-ballot

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/29/2023 at 3:06 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

Yes, the Trump haters are drawn to any thread with Trump in the title, to see how many insults they can cram into multiple posts.

If all mention of Trump was banned there would likely be only half as many threads on this sub forum.

The TDS people would have nothing left to do. 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, uttradit said:

Why improve elections if nothing fishy happened? The guy looks slimey and contradicts himself.

 

What was fishy and stank to high heaven was that trump tried to steal the election. That's what Biden was talking about.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/2/2024 at 4:01 PM, Danderman123 said:

Trump paid me to find voter fraud. Then he lied after I found 2020 election wasn't stolen.

 

Has Trump ever provided any proof that the 2020 election was stolen? Why not?

 

All his minions say they have the evidence.  Comer, Rudy, Jordan, Stone, Bannon, and that whole truckload of clowns.  They just don't have it right now.  Crazy ol' Rudy declaring the evidence will be produced right in front of the courthouse where he was just ordered to pay off the poll workers he defamed.  Going into their 4th year of these empty announcements.   It's the same old song.  :violin:

When they do find evidence of voter fraud, it turns out to be the culprits are pro-orange.  Here's a taste:

https://newrepublic.com/post/177304/mistake-james-comer-new-biden-corruption-claim

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/10/wider-house-oversights-net-more-often-they-catch-trump/

 

The DOJ should revisit the Mueller report and toss out the redacted piece of fertilizer that Barr replaced it with.  Should have done it three tears ago.  I have to suspect there are reasons they do not.  Personally, I think Garland dragged his feet on going after the DT circus is right around the same time Ecuador had an election and the first thing the winner did was arrest the guy he was running against, and if the US did the same (which would have been warranted) it would look too much same-same.

 

Edited by bendejo
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...