It's not because you speak negatively about these incidents. It's because you only seem interested in them when a foreigner is the one in the wrong. When the facts are unclear, you almost invariably fill in the gaps with assumptions that paint the foreigner as the villain. That's the bias people are reacting to. The pattern is fairly obvious: - Thai assaults Thai? Silence. - Foreigner assaults Thai? "Terrible foreigner." - Thai assaults foreigner? "The foreigner must have done something to deserve it." That's why you frequently receive push-back. You're not being criticised for condemning bad behaviour; you're being criticised because your condemnation is extremely selective. You don't receive "nasty comments" for speaking out. You get called out because your anti-foreigner bias has become predictable. For some reason, you seem to interpret that pushback as victimisation. You regularly claim you're being attacked or targeted on the forum, when in reality people are simply challenging views they see as excessively one-sided. The more outspoken and absolute your position becomes, the more likely others are to push back and provide balance. That's not persecution, it's the natural consequence of repeatedly presenting the same biased narrative.
