Trump: Would be a "great honor" to be jailed for gag order violation

[Goat]

There is no way Donald would pay a porn star to keep quiet about him cheating on his wife to win an election.

 

Right?

[Presto]

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Another fact-filled, well thought out response from the left. 

And I'm not even on the left. Just fairly good at pointing out the Trumpeter nutcases.

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Goat said:

There is no way Donald would pay a porn star to keep quiet about him cheating on his wife to win an election.

 

Right?

Well if he did, he needs to be destroyed for it. 

[candide]

16 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Man, you're a joke.

Says someone who considers Trump's complaints as proof! 😀

 

But don't hesitate to contact me for apologizes after an appeal court has validated this "proof". I will gladly oblige.

[farangkinok]

Does anybody remember this? Were there any consequences for Chuck Schumer after this disgraceful threat against Supreme Court Justices?

 

Edited April 8 by farangkinok

[Yellowtail]

5 minutes ago, farangkinok said:

Does anybody remember this? Did were there any consequences for Chuck Schumer after this disgraceful threat against Supreme Court Justices?

 

No one cares when the left attacks judges. 

 

 

[candide]

20 minutes ago, farangkinok said:

Does anybody remember this? Did were there any consequences for Chuck Schumer after this disgraceful threat against Supreme Court Justices?

 

He has clarified what he said!

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/schumer-denies-threatening-supreme-court-justices-says-i-shouldn-t-n1150446

 

Waiting for Trump to declare he should not have used the words he said... 😀

Edited April 8 by candide

[Yellowtail]

5 minutes ago, candide said:

He has clarified what he said!

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/schumer-denies-threatening-supreme-court-justices-says-i-shouldn-t-n1150446

 

Waiting for Trump to declare he should not have used the words he said... 😀

Of course he did, and then he got a pass.

 

He said it, and he meant it.

 

And lets not forget the people allowed to "protest" illegally outside the justices homes. 

[candide]

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Of course he did, and then he got a pass.

 

He said it, and he meant it.

 

And lets not forget the people allowed to "protest" illegally outside the justices homes. 

Lol! Are you leaving in his head to know what he really meant?

 

Anyway, in case of doubt, let's put a gag order on Schumer for his trial by the Supreme Court! 😀

[spidermike007]

5 hours ago, Bangkok Barry said:

Something that seems to pass people by is that, guilty or not, the man has absolutely no class. He is an ignorant (comparing himself to Nelson Mandella the last idiocy) loud-mouthed tasteless American who is interested only in himself and no-one and nothing else.

I've posted this before but it's worth putting up again, because it sums him up perfectly:

Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?" 
Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:
"A few things spring to mind.
Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.
Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.
I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.
But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.
Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.
And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.
There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.
Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.
And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.
Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.
He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.
He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.
And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.
There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.
So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
* Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.
This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.
After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of <deleted>. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.
He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.
And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:
'My God… what… have… I… created?
If being a <deleted> was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."
 

You made my day, that was truly outstanding and the Nate White quote is brilliant. A great summary of a man lacking class to the extreme. 

 

I would go one step further and call him the very definition of an empty suit, he is literally a hot air balloon of a man. 

[Yellowtail]

20 minutes ago, candide said:

Lol! Are you leaving in his head to know what he really meant?

I heard what he said, saw the protest, and remember at least one attempted murder. 

 

20 minutes ago, candide said:

 

Anyway, in case of doubt, let's put a gag order on Schumer for his trial by the Supreme Court! 😀

ha ha 

[bendejo]

Trump: Would be a "great honor" to be jailed for gag order violation

 

Afford him the honor!   Preferably in a Georgia state prison.  Do they still have chain gangs?

 

 

 

Edited April 8 by bendejo

[TorquayFan]

Walker - a step too far methinks. But I get it. Trump's behaviour is seditious and treasonous but even so . . . . . better not to create a Martyr?

 

 

Edited April 8 by TorquayFan

[thaibeachlovers]

21 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

This man is such a coward, one day in prison and he would wet his pants. He could not go one day without a hamburger, this man doesn't know what the word sacrifice means, he loves to talk big as long as he thinks there's no consequences, and as long as he's convinced he will never have to follow up. Such insincerity.

You guys! You have such vivid imaginations.

 

It's highly unlikely he will go to jail, as it would be far too hard to organise the secret service protection detail- are they going to empty cells for them to set up in ?

The far more likely scenario is home arrest.

[thaibeachlovers]

14 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

You made my day, that was truly outstanding and the Nate White quote is brilliant. A great summary of a man lacking class to the extreme. 

 

I would go one step further and call him the very definition of an empty suit, he is literally a hot air balloon of a man. 

LOL. Sounds like a typical "ugly American" abroad.

[thaibeachlovers]

16 hours ago, Presto said:

And I'm not even on the left. Just fairly good at pointing out the Trumpeter nutcases.

 

That's sooooooooooo funny. In fact I think it deserves another .

[thaibeachlovers]

16 hours ago, Presto said:

Man, you're a joke.

Nah, he's right.

[thaibeachlovers]

19 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I too, would consider it a "great honor" if Trump were imprisoned for anything. And, while he's there, he could be waterboarded without asking him any questions. Just waterboard him all day, every day for a week or so. 

I'm very disappointed in you for that. I thought you were a better person than to want to torture another human being. I'm apparently wrong.

 

Bye.

[thaibeachlovers]

19 hours ago, charleskerins said:

"a whit"      When did a Democratic candidate for President threaten a judge -oh that's right none of them were criminals.

 

Lock his ass up   and let there be Civil War       we will see who comes out on top.

Sure, and we know who has more guns, don't we!

[thaibeachlovers]

19 hours ago, stoner said:

 

you must feel so much better being able to get all that off your chest in one comment. impressive. 

It's good when they spend so much time ranting on one post as it keeps us from being subject to more posts like that.

[GarryP]

18 hours ago, rudi49jr said:

Wow, that is a deeply disturbing comment. Especially coming from the member (no pun intended) who obviously has the biggest Trump boner of everyone on this forum. And that’s saying something, you have some stiff competition there. Again, no pun intended.

That mentally triggers a gag reflex.  

[Eric Loh]

3 hours ago, TorquayFan said:

Walker - a step too far methinks. But I get it. Trump's behaviour is seditious and treasonous but even so . . . . . better not to create a Martyr?

 

 

He really has contribute nothing of value to the country nor live his life for sake of principle to be worthy to be called martyr. He will go to jail, lost the election and will be forgotten soon after. Another nut will surface amongst the Maga GOP and their lemmings will gravitate towards. 

[newnative]

Yes, honor him already and lock him up.

[spidermike007]

3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

LOL. Sounds like a typical "ugly American" abroad.

You sure don't like any criticism of your Master, do you? 

[spidermike007]

3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm very disappointed in you for that. I thought you were a better person than to want to torture another human being. I'm apparently wrong.

 

Bye.

If he were to be waterboarded or tortured or mistreated in any manner, while in the big house, you could very easily say that he spent nearly 50 years of his career earning that honor. One can only hope. 

 

Respect has to be earned and should never be freely given, and this man has never done anything in his lifetime to earn any respect. 

[charleskerins]

3 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Sure, and we know who has more guns, don't we!

the military 

[charleskerins]

On 4/8/2024 at 1:59 PM, sirineou said:

They don't want to give him the "Martyr" card to play , 

 

Maybe they should watch that old STP commercial you can pay me now or a lot more later. F him     jail him

[charleskerins]

23 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Democratic candidates for President don't need to, they always get a pass. Remember Hillary and the server? Biden and the classified documents he stole? 

 

 

 

Where is the judge threat ? There wasn't    Biden stole them and kept them from the FBI when asked for them? Oh wait that was the other guy.  Hillary gave a speech outside the Capitol claiming the election was stolen and her supporters attacked the capitol ? Oh wait that was the Donald.    Your hatred of Democrats and American Democracy renders you illogical.  Economic you're not bad.

[charleskerins]

23 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

He knows that, like all leftists he just posts links to meaningless articles that do not support their argument.

 

He'll be back in a minute, he went to get a fresh box of tissue...

"like all leftists"   you're full of cliches  ,generalizations and nonsense.

[charleskerins]

23 hours ago, frank83628 said:

that wasnt what i asked, what others have been given a gag order through a similar situation as this....can't say i know of any. 

How many presidents do you know that engaged in insurrection?  Gag orders  

See, for example, State v Plunkett, 934 P2d 113, 116 (Kan 1997) (upholding termi-

nation of defendants self-representation after he maintained a surly, disrespectful atti- tude throughout the proceeding, became belligerent and used profanity during argument on motions, refused to stand when addressing the court, and stopped answering the judge's questions); People v Davis, 851 P2d 239, 243-44 (Colo App 1993) (upholding exclu- sion of defendant from courtroom after he spat in the prosecutor's face, fought with deputy sheriffs, and physically attacked and shouted obscenities at a prosecution witness).

2 See, for example, Stewart v Corbin, 850 F2d 492, 494-96 (9th Cir 1988) (defendant threatened the trial judge, used abusive language, and intimidated a witness with his conduct).

' Illinoisv Allen, 397 US 337, 343-44 (1970) (holding that constitutionally permissi- ble remedies include binding and gagging the defendant, citing him for contempt, or re- moving him from the courtroom). See also Tanksley v State, 946 P2d 148, 150-51 (Nev 1997) (finding defendant in contempt for talking back and behaving disrespectfully); Scurr,647 F2d at 855 (upholding court order that defendant wear handcuffs and a body belt inside a coat after he assaulted a jailer); Stewart, 20 F3d at 915 (affirming lower court's decision to place defendant in leg irons during trial); Stewart, 850 F2d at 499-500 (affirming decision to gag defendant for repeatedly disobeying court orders and intimi- dating a witness).  Source University of Chicago unbound

Edited April 9 by charleskerins
sourcing