Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Tensions between Iran and Israel have reached a fever pitch, with US President Joe Biden expressing concerns about a potential Iranian attack on Israel in the near future. The escalation follows an airstrike earlier this month that reportedly targeted top Iranian commanders, raising fears of retaliatory strikes from Tehran.

 

While Israel has not officially claimed responsibility for the airstrike, it is widely believed to be behind the attack. In response, Iranian officials have issued warnings of potential retaliation, heightening the sense of uncertainty and volatility in the region.

 

President Biden's remarks underscore the gravity of the situation, emphasizing the United States' commitment to defending Israel against any threats posed by Iran. The prospect of an Iranian attack has put Israel on high alert, prompting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to convene meetings with his war cabinet to assess the country's readiness to respond to potential threats.

 

The recent exchange of hostilities has also sparked concerns among other nations, with several countries issuing travel warnings for Israel and urging their citizens to exercise caution. The US State Department has restricted the movement of diplomatic staff in Israel, reflecting the seriousness of the situation.

 

In Israel, the threat of a potential attack has prompted authorities to take precautionary measures, including bolstering air defenses, cancelling home leave for combat troops, and assessing the readiness of public shelters. While some Israelis remain defiant in the face of potential danger, others are understandably apprehensive about the escalating tensions.

 

The airstrike on the Iranian consulate in Damascus earlier this month resulted in the deaths of several senior Iranian military leaders, further exacerbating tensions between Iran and Israel. The incident has raised concerns about the potential for a wider regional conflict, prompting diplomatic efforts to defuse the situation.

 

Despite efforts to de-escalate tensions, the situation remains highly volatile, with the risk of further provocations and retaliatory actions looming large. As the international community watches closely, the need for dialogue and diplomacy to prevent a full-blown conflict has never been more urgent.

 

13.04.24

Source

 

image.png

Posted

I've long thought of Israel as being like an overseas territory of the USA, almost like a colony. Also, who ever thought that establishing what is basically a European country in the middle east was going to work out well?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Andrew65 said:

I've long thought of Israel as being like an overseas territory of the USA, almost like a colony. Also, who ever thought that establishing what is basically a European country in the middle east was going to work out well?

 

You will have to go back to WWI, and the Balfour Delaration. When England was so desperate not to lose, they would promise anything to anyone.

 

Still it took WWII to give the jews the population to actually make Israel a state. That because Euro's went full genocide kill crazy. The jews who survived the blood slaughter did not want to return to that cursed continent. The rest is history. Old history.

 

As for your long thoughts ... as Ted Williams said "if you don't  think too good, best not to think too much"

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Dcheech
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Dcheech said:

 

You will have to go back to WWI, and the Balfour Delaration. When England was so desperate not to lose, they would promise anything to anyone.

 

Still it took WWII to give the jews the population to actually make Israel a state. That because Euro's went full genocide kill crazy. The jews who survived the blood slaughter did not want to return to that cursed continent. The rest is history. Old history.

 

As for your long thoughts ... as Ted Williams said "if you don't  think too good, best not to think too much"

 

 

 

 

 

Not the Euro's went crazy, just Nazi Germany, many Euro nations were fighting them... ............ 🤔

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, billd766 said:

It seems to be OK with the USA for Israel to attack Iran in a third country, but NOT OK for Iran to retaliate. Double standards anyone>

 

All Iran needs to do is keep threating Israel, thus keeping them on a costly high alert, without actually doing anything.

Iran was supplying weapons etc to Gaza, an Iranian pawn, they are implicated.

When the USA turned up in force, Iran bottled it and left Hamas high and "near" dry.......🤗

Posted
3 hours ago, Andrew65 said:

I've long thought of Israel as being like an overseas territory of the USA, almost like a colony. Also, who ever thought that establishing what is basically a European country in the middle east was going to work out well?

Yeah, I often wonder if relocating Cuba in the mid west would be a suitable comparison. Or the rohingya.

Posted
5 hours ago, Dcheech said:

Still it took WWII to give the jews the population to actually make Israel a state. That because Euro's went full genocide kill crazy. The jews who survived the blood slaughter did not want to return to that cursed continent. The rest is history. Old history.

 

Exactly. After the Holocaust, and given the preceding two millennia of antisemitism and pogroms, the Jewish people deservedly had earned their own state, where they could have control over their own security. And where else could it have been other than where it is now? Silesia? Madagascar (where the Nazi leadership proposed sending European Jews)? Long Island, New York?

 

Israel has made peace with two immediate neighbors as well as Turkey and a few Gulf states, and has working relationships with other Gulf states and Muslim states elsewhere. What’s preventing further progress is extremism on both sides.

Posted (edited)

The world has a bigger Climate issue!

WW111 . It ain’t safe anywhere!

imop


 

 Post Hamas / Israel war article :

President Biden strode into office promising to restore competency and credibility to U.S. foreign policy after four years of President Trump’s shoot-from-the-hip diplomacy, but several international missteps and crises abroad have undermined his claim.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/oct/14/world-crises-undermine-joe-bidens-boast-foreign-po/

 

 

Edited by riclag
  • Confused 2
Posted

Joe should concentrate on walking without falling over before attempting predictions on geo politics.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

I do not think Iran will attack, but they are losing face by not attacking, especially after the Israel attack on its consulate  in Damascus.

But they know if they do attack, they must know they cannot win, if the West joins in which they will, Iran will get bombed, and they know which facilities to attack.

If Iran has the bomb, would they use it, again I would say no, but they could well use Hamas, Houthis, and Hezbollah to attack ...who knows what, which will cause chaos. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Dcheech said:

Washington Times?!

 

A hard right-wing fringe critter, even more incoherent than FOX.  

 

 

 

 

 


you should consider most people on here dont have a clue who Ted Williams is ( far right conservative fringe critter baseball great )but you used his quote to mock another opinion “As for your long thoughts ... as Ted Williams said "if you don't  think too good, best not to think too much"

 Good ole Ted he’d be right next to Bobby Knight in heaven  cursing the 

biden marxist regime for helping create 

a world in peril!
 Heres a left leaning source.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2024/02/20/president-bidens-disastrous-moves-are-making-the-world-more-dangerous/?sh=12a875845dc0

Edited by riclag
  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Joe should concentrate on walking without falling over before attempting predictions on geo politics.

He was right.

Posted (edited)

"The escalation follows an airstrike earlier this month that reportedly targeted top Iranian commanders"

Very selective news, airstrike on a embassy. This is the new normal? What would happen with any other country striking an embassy? It could be seen as a declaration of war.

Edited by FritsSikkink
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

"The escalation follows an airstrike earlier this month that reportedly targeted top Iranian commanders"

Very selective news, airstrike on a embassy. This is the new normal? What would happen with any other country striking an embassy? It could be seen as a declaration of war.

Some rules only apply to certain countries it would seem.

This contravened The Vienna Convention.

Edited by Andrew65
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Iran has launched an attack drones are being shot down as I type the Iranians claim to have fired ballistic missiles as well no evidence of it yet sad its always the regular people that pay the highest price……

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...