Jump to content

BREAKING NEWS! Iran potentially triggers World War 3


george

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Israel bombed the embassy of Iran a few weeks ago. That is a big no-no.

 

There is this from wiki. I don't know how accurate wiki is, but here it is anyway: 

Quote

It is the obligation of the country in which an embassy is located to protect the embassy, but international treaties do not expressly prohibit a third country to target diplomatic premises if they host combatants and are targeted in an act of self-defense, although a claim of self-defense cannot usually justify an attack on the territory of a country not participating in hostilities.

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_bombing_of_the_Iranian_embassy_in_Damascus

 

And it was an annex that was hit, not the embassy itself. Inside were Iranian generals who had planned October 7.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Hummin said:

 

Wondering sometimes when I read the comments in here, how many have served in the army, and how many have served in active duty in a real conflict zone.

 

or ever experienced a true physical conflict at all. 

Most probably not.  Weak, woke and twisted thinking.  Probably from "neutral" countries yet all they do is scream for help when there is a problem.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

As a scary aside, Israel has thermonuclear bombs. If they dropped one on Tehran, people in a radius of 40 miles from Ground Zero would be sucked up in the mushroom cloud.

The latest nuclear bunker Iran has build apparently takes like dozens of warplanes with the most heavy bombs, full loads, to then maybe reach the depth of the bunker. Israel is not capable of doing that, they would need USA for that.

 

Smart politics though, give Iran some billions knowing they will use it outside the agreement, then trigger a war that makes trillions for the industry.

Edited by ChaiyaTH
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ChaiyaTH said:

Smart politics though, give Iran some billions knowing they will use it outside the agreement, then trigger a war that makes trillions for the industry.

Do you mean by the US? 

Wait a minute, there's no oil in Iran 😉 

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Excogitator said:

Israel attacked Iran, Iran retaliated.

Nobody acts with impunity in this world, even if they think they are entitled to..

 

Again, Israel did not attack Iran.

 

They knocked out top generals of Iran's IRGC (regional terror export org) meeting in Syria certainly planning further illegal attacks on Israel. 

 

IRGC is designated as a foreign terrorist organization (FBO). Before that in 2007 former (literally) IRGC-QF Commander Qassim Soleimani was designated as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist. Get the picture? 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connda said:

In case the Main Stream News which is reporting this didn't notice, Israeli bombed the Iranian embassy consulate on April 1st in violation of international diplomatic conventions that protect ALL diplomatic missions worldwide.

 

i was just watching the news and they mentioned that... which brought me back to 1979... when iran overtook the american embassy. now, after they did it 40 years ago, they are crying about an injustice? isnt that hypocrisy at its best?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, John Drake said:

 

There is this from wiki. I don't know how accurate wiki is, but here it is anyway: 

 

And it was an annex that was hit, not the embassy itself. Inside were Iranian generals who had planned October 7.

If you like watch the video from Glenn Greenwald, which I included in my original message.

He mentions a couple of cases where there would have been "good reasons" to storm embassies, but it didn't happen because in general countries respect embassies from other countries.

Israel obviously knows this. They knew that their attack on Iran's embassy would provoke retaliation from Iran. It seems that is what Israel wanted, so that they pull the USA more and more into this conflict. And the USA obviously does what Israel wants. Sad. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, FruitPudding said:
10 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Do you mean by the US? 

Wait a minute, there's no oil in Iran 😉 

 

Your profile picture is so cringy, by the way 

 

dont worry, this guy is whacked in the head...

Edited by Pouatchee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rabas said:

Again, Israel did not attack Iran.

They attacked Iran's embassy. Internationally an embassy it seen as the equivalent of the country.

An attack on the embassy of country X is equal to an attack on that county.

And Israel obviously did this deliberately. 

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Iran has taken the wrong approach.

Assuming Iran has operatives in Isreal, here's what I think they should have done:
- Readied all their missiles and drones and leaked information to Israel that they would release them at the same time at the same hour Israel attacked their mission in Syria on Apr 1.

- Just before that time, increase all their military offensive preparation activity to focus Israel's attention on having their defensive forces ready.

- At the time of the Apr 1 attack, have three of their operatives in Israel kill three Israelis- three Israelis for three Iranians.

- There should be one in the north, one in the middle of Israel, and one in the south.
- The three Israelis should consist of one elderly man, one young woman (preferably a mother), and one child about ten years old.
- After these killings have been accomplished, Iran should declare its retaliatory action was over, had been successful to their satisfaction, and draw down its offensive weapons (keeping on the alert with their defensive weapons in case of offensive action from Israel.) 

That's what I would have suggested they should have.

As an explanation, doing this would show Israelis:

- They cannot depend on their superior military forces to protect them.
- They are vulnerable wherever they are.
- They are vulnerable whoever they are.

Edited by WDSmart
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ChaiyaTH said:

Sounds like a good timing, then the USA can pretend that it is not a good time to do elections.

 

most news stations are saying that if biden officially joins in the fight he can kiss the election goodbye

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

They attacked Iran's embassy. Internationally an embassy it seen as the equivalent of the country.

 

I remember telling that to the Thai trollop at the British Embassy. 

 

She was like, "No, this is Thailand "

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

funny how ballistic missiles appeared-disappeared from news.

Iron Dome is very expensive toy to play, meanwhile drones are much-much cheaper. Tonight exchange had cost IDF hell of the money, who will pay? Americans again? Funny, they could replace few <deleted> holes like Blinken and sort it way cheaper 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, connda said:

And somewhere in the totally insane segment of your own subconscious, you actually believe that you personally will be totally unaffected by a Middle Eastern nuclear holocaust? 

 

How would he be affected?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NativeBob said:

funny how ballistic missiles appeared-disappeared from news.

Iron Dome is very expensive toy to play, meanwhile drones are much-much cheaper. Tonight exchange had cost IDF hell of the money, who will pay? Americans again? Funny, they could replace few <deleted> holes like Blinken and sort it way cheaper 

 

Not just drones Bob, it stopped many hundreds of powerful (big) drones, ballistic missiles, and sophisticated  hypersonic and cruise missiles.  Iran was reaching for the sky, they wanted massive damage. Not a retaliatory response for a small consular building on foreign territory.

 

And they failed. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, NativeBob said:

funny how ballistic missiles appeared-disappeared from news.

Iron Dome is very expensive toy to play, meanwhile drones are much-much cheaper. Tonight exchange had cost IDF hell of the money, who will pay? Americans again? Funny, they could replace few <deleted> holes like Blinken and sort it way cheaper 

Blinken has to go! 

  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

Obama and Biden knew the days of the mullahs was almost over. WAS. The youth of Iran want modernity and secularism. The mullahs are aging and will be gone soon, but they are now using external threats to rebuild the anti-Western theocracy.

 

I've been hearing about an Iranian youth revolt since the 1990s. Most of them are in late middle age now. At least. Somehow, the revolution never happens. Either the government is more than capable of always beating them down, or the "modern youth" eventually age into comfortable defenders of the status quo.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...