2 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Should I explain this at a level for a child? Seems a necessity

Please explain it at any level you can.

 

I think it a safe bet you cannot explain it at any level.

6 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Please explain it at any level you can.

 

I think it a safe bet you cannot explain it at any level.

Substance is not his forte... 

On 5/3/2024 at 5:10 AM, Skipalongcassidy said:

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the current employment level is about 3 million jobs higher than it was in January 2020, just before the COVID-19 pandemic began.

By contrast, the economy added 6.33 million jobs in Trump’s first three years in office, more than double Biden’s figure.

More importantly, there is a stark difference in the quality of the jobs added under both presidents.

Compared to pre-COVID-19 levels, a little over 2 million full-time jobs have been added under Biden, along with more than 1.18 million part-time jobs.

As I already noted, in Trump’s first three years, total employment rose by 6.33 million, but unlike with Biden, nearly all of those jobs were full-time positions. Part-time employment increased by just 17,000 jobs from January 2017 to January 2020, less than 1% of the total number of added jobs.

What you are saying here is that many of the new jobs created by Biden were recoveries from the Trump disaster, much like FDR was able to bring back jobs lost under Herbert Hoover.

 

This is not really a great defense of Trump's job creation performance.

7 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

What you are saying here is that many of the new jobs created by Biden were recoveries from the Trump disaster, much like FDR was able to bring back jobs lost under Herbert Hoover.

 

This is not really a great defense of Trump's job creation performance.

Sorry... reading comprehension is not your forte I see.

LOL...Bide beating Trump in the polls....sure he is, just point out where, what, when, 

 

Meanwhile back in reality...

 

 

Rasmussen Poll recent APR 29

 

 

RCP Trump increases lead over Biden

 

Edited May 4, 20242 yr by stats
trolling comments removed

The election is still months away, and depending on which poll someone wants to pick, the numbers are close, generally within the margins of error. Newsweek via MSN:

Donald Trump Stung by Double Polling Blow

Two polls have suggested Donald Trump will lose the presidential election, in the latest swing in what has been a tight race so far.

...

Polls have so far shown that the results will be tight as the pair are statistically tied in most surveys or enjoying only marginal leads.

 

However, two recent polls have suggested Trump is now lagging, marginally. In one poll of 1,046 adults by Florida Atlantic University and Mainstreet Research, 40 percent of all voters said they would vote for Biden and 38 percent would choose Trump in a race in which independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was included.

 

When only likely voters were polled, 44 percent said they would vote for Biden and 39 percent for Trump.

 

(more)

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/donald-trump-stung-by-double-polling-blow/ar-AA1o5xpW

 

Edited May 4, 20242 yr by TallGuyJohninBKK

19 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Please explain it at any level you can.

 

I think it a safe bet you cannot explain it at any level.

 

13 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Substance is not his forte... 

Not sure it's worth my time...

4 hours ago, illisdean said:

LOL...Bide beating Trump in the polls....sure he is, just point out where, what, when, 

 

Meanwhile back in reality...

 

 

Rasmussen Poll recent APR 29

 

 

RCP Trump increases lead over Biden

 

They were predicting Trump would win last time. Not very reliable

1 hour ago, Roo Island said:

 

Not sure it's worth my time...

Thats what I thought, another false claim you can't back up.

 

You brag about your educated as an economist, but you do not seem to understand anything, much less have the ability to explain anything in that involves economics. 

 

1. Please explain how bringing in ten million illegals that are often illiterate in their native language, much less English, benefits the economy? I know how it benefits the rich, please explain how it benefits the poor and middle class. 

 

2. Please explain how millions of low and no skilled workers do not put downward pressure on wages. 

 

3. Please explain how the need millions of new households do not put upward pressure on housing costs.

 

4. Please explain how millions of new people using the same public services such as health-care, education, food stamps, welfare and all other government assistance programs does not in increase the cost of those programs and or reduce the availability. 

 

5. Please explain how adding two million new jobs is really great when you've imported ten million new workers. 

 

Please, you're an economist, why not explain what's really going on with illegal immigration? Again, you likely can't, but you will post a link to some idiocy you don't understand and pretend you've proven something. 

On 5/3/2024 at 10:24 AM, Roo Island said:

No BS. My education was in economics. Yours?

This is your economic leader...  "The U.S. government can't go bankrupt, because we can print our own money," Bernstein says in the video. He was then asked by the interviewer, "Like you said, they print the dollar, so why does the government even borrow?"

Bernstein's reply seems to indicate uncertainty – at best – about monetary policy.

"Again, some of this stuff gets – some of the language and concepts are just confusing. The government definitely prints money, and it definitely lends that money by selling bonds. Is that what they do? They sell bonds, yeah, they sell bonds. Right? Since they sell bonds, and people buy the bonds, and lend them the money," Bernstein replied.

On 4/29/2024 at 6:50 AM, earlinclaifornia said:

Looks like the new Sarah Palin:

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/apr/27/kristi-noem-dog-goat-book-trump-running-mate-polling

Trump has her pegged too.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-disgusted-kristi-noem-puppy-210914744.html

15 hours ago, Roo Island said:

They were predicting Trump would win last time. Not very reliable

His brand is dying and he has not been broadening his appeal while his loyal base is conflicted and shrinking. Lots of bold prediction from right wing pollsters. I will brushed them off. 

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/7-trump-losses-in-a-row-and-counting-195434518.html

20 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Thats what I thought, another false claim you can't back up.

 

You brag about your educated as an economist, but you do not seem to understand anything, much less have the ability to explain anything in that involves economics. 

 

1. Please explain how bringing in ten million illegals that are often illiterate in their native language, much less English, benefits the economy? I know how it benefits the rich, please explain how it benefits the poor and middle class. 

 

2. Please explain how millions of low and no skilled workers do not put downward pressure on wages. 

 

3. Please explain how the need millions of new households do not put upward pressure on housing costs.

 

4. Please explain how millions of new people using the same public services such as health-care, education, food stamps, welfare and all other government assistance programs does not in increase the cost of those programs and or reduce the availability. 

 

5. Please explain how adding two million new jobs is really great when you've imported ten million new workers. 

 

Please, you're an economist, why not explain what's really going on with illegal immigration? Again, you likely can't, but you will post a link to some idiocy you don't understand and pretend you've proven something. 

Again. Don't want to waste my time. You've drank the kool-aid

8 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Trump has her pegged too.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-disgusted-kristi-noem-puppy-210914744.html

She's out

10 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

This is your economic leader...  "The U.S. government can't go bankrupt, because we can print our own money," Bernstein says in the video. He was then asked by the interviewer, "Like you said, they print the dollar, so why does the government even borrow?"

Bernstein's reply seems to indicate uncertainty – at best – about monetary policy.

"Again, some of this stuff gets – some of the language and concepts are just confusing. The government definitely prints money, and it definitely lends that money by selling bonds. Is that what they do? They sell bonds, yeah, they sell bonds. Right? Since they sell bonds, and people buy the bonds, and lend them the money," Bernstein replied.

Link?

Biden viewed as the weakest president by majority of voters, defiantly NOT a win for the feckless and mentally challenged Biden. But to some on the left, they have no concept and generally no clue and should read and try to comprehend some of the polls for more answers and a dose of reality.

 

• “A new Economist/YouGov poll found that the majority of Americans believe former President Donald Trump is a strong leader the U.S. needs, while President Joe Biden is one of the weakest presidents they have seen.”

   

 

Biden weakest president-YouGov

 

The Economist/YouGov Poll April 28 - 30, 2024

Edited May 5, 20242 yr by illisdean

10 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

This is your economic leader...  "The U.S. government can't go bankrupt, because we can print our own money," Bernstein says in the video. He was then asked by the interviewer, "Like you said, they print the dollar, so why does the government even borrow?"

Bernstein's reply seems to indicate uncertainty – at best – about monetary policy.

"Again, some of this stuff gets – some of the language and concepts are just confusing. The government definitely prints money, and it definitely lends that money by selling bonds. Is that what they do? They sell bonds, yeah, they sell bonds. Right? Since they sell bonds, and people buy the bonds, and lend them the money," Bernstein replied.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/white-house-economic-adviser-struggles-with-question-on-monetary-policy

 

Not Biden, just some advisor.

4 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/white-house-economic-adviser-struggles-with-question-on-monetary-policy

 

Not Biden, just some advisor.

Just Biden's Chief Economic Advisor. 

13 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Link?

Take one sentence out of the quote and google it... it will provide all the links that you need... typical 

12 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/white-house-economic-adviser-struggles-with-question-on-monetary-policy

 

Not Biden, just some advisor.

HAHAHA... I spilled my coffee over that one!!!

Once one of Trump’s closest confidants, Hicks provided a window into the chaotic fallout over the tape’s release just days before a crucial debate with Democrat Hillary Clinton. It was recorded in 2005 but was not seen by the public until Oct. 7, 2016, about a month before Election Day. Hicks described being stunned and huddling with other Trump advisers after learning about the tape’s existence from the Washington Post reporter who broke the story. Hicks forwarded the reporter’s request to campaign leadership with the recommendation to “deny, deny, deny,” she said.

 

In other words, her first instinct was to recommend lying as a defense.

4 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Once one of Trump’s closest confidants, Hicks provided a window into the chaotic fallout over the tape’s release just days before a crucial debate with Democrat Hillary Clinton. It was recorded in 2005 but was not seen by the public until Oct. 7, 2016, about a month before Election Day. Hicks described being stunned and huddling with other Trump advisers after learning about the tape’s existence from the Washington Post reporter who broke the story. Hicks forwarded the reporter’s request to campaign leadership with the recommendation to “deny, deny, deny,” she said.

 

In other words, her first instinct was to recommend lying as a defense.

Wait, I thought you said it did not come out until after the election....

12 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Take one sentence out of the quote and google it... it will provide all the links that you need... typical 

Typical. No link.

18 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

Typical. No link.

Speaking of typical, you bragged about your educated as an economist, but you do not seem to understand anything, much less have the ability to explain anything in that involves economics. 

 

1. Please explain how bringing in ten million illegals that are often illiterate in their native language, much less English, benefits the economy? I know how it benefits the rich, please explain how it benefits the poor and middle class. 

 

2. Please explain how millions of low and no skilled workers do not put downward pressure on wages. 

 

3. Please explain how the need millions of new households do not put upward pressure on housing costs.

 

4. Please explain how millions of new people using the same public services such as health-care, education, food stamps, welfare and all other government assistance programs does not in increase the cost of those programs and or reduce the availability. 

 

5. Please explain how adding two million new jobs is really great when you've imported ten million new workers. 

 

Please, you're an economist, why not explain what's really going on with illegal immigration? Again, you likely can't, but you will post a link to some idiocy you don't understand and pretend you've proven something. 

 

No doubt you don't have time to support your climes, but you demand others do. Typical leftist. 

11 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Typical. No link.

The link was provided twice in other posts... you are just tooooo lazy

It is quite bat <deleted> crazy there are even people who can contemplate another Biden presidency, much less vote for him. 
 

what’s the line from apocalypse now. He’s quite clearly gone insane…

23 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Take one sentence out of the quote and google it... it will provide all the links that you need... typical 

Here down load this

2 hours ago, Robert Paulson said:

It is quite bat <deleted> crazy there are even people who can contemplate another Biden presidency, much less vote for him. 
 

what’s the line from apocalypse now. He’s quite clearly gone insane…

I am all in on Biden. Are you voting? My vote would cancell you out.

14 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Wait, I thought you said it did not come out until after the election....

You are quoting a post about the Access Hollywood tape, which came out before the election.

16 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Speaking of typical, you bragged about your educated as an economist, but you do not seem to understand anything, much less have the ability to explain anything in that involves economics. 

 

1. Please explain how bringing in ten million illegals that are often illiterate in their native language, much less English, benefits the economy? I know how it benefits the rich, please explain how it benefits the poor and middle class. 

 

2. Please explain how millions of low and no skilled workers do not put downward pressure on wages. 

 

3. Please explain how the need millions of new households do not put upward pressure on housing costs.

 

4. Please explain how millions of new people using the same public services such as health-care, education, food stamps, welfare and all other government assistance programs does not in increase the cost of those programs and or reduce the availability. 

 

5. Please explain how adding two million new jobs is really great when you've imported ten million new workers. 

 

Please, you're an economist, why not explain what's really going on with illegal immigration? Again, you likely can't, but you will post a link to some idiocy you don't understand and pretend you've proven something. 

 

No doubt you don't have time to support your climes, but you demand others do. Typical leftist. 

If you don't have time to put up a proper link, I don't have time for a reply. Not worth the effort