Bday Prang Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 4 hours ago, newbee2022 said: The facts aren't like that. Many governments, at least in EU, implements in official wordings the diversity of population. Even build 3 different toilets in school: men, women, diverse. So obviously not a "small subset" issue. This is how it should always have been in my opinion Of course its not a minor issue , the rest of society needs protecting from sexual deviants, many of whom, for reasons known only to themselves, choose to indulge in their sexual activities in public toilets The clever move on the part of the authorities, was to convince the ABCD..."communities" that it is for their benefit and protection, and, best of all, that it was their idea all along. Imagine the outcry from people like yourself if the members of the "diverse communities" were capable of realising that it was not their idea at all , but that the authorities had decided that their presence in public toilets used by normal people was simply unacceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bday Prang Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 4 hours ago, jacko45k said: And yet, twenty years ago, nobody bothered and the world still turned. I recently supervised the construction of 3 secondary schools in the UK all the kids toilets were "unisex" with no urinals. The only gender specific area was the pupils "mother and baby nappy changing area" !!! Personally I am in favour of segregation of public toilets and its a stroke of genius on the part of the authorities concerned, that they have effectively made the "diverse community" incorrectly believe that it was A) for their benefit , and B) their own idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now