Jump to content

Chinese Tourists Revive Thailand Tourism Using ED Visa


webfact

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, JayClay said:

 

There are many people from all over the world staying in Thailand on ED visas studying just 4 hours a week.

 

I don't know why you think it is an exclusive option for Chinese only?

I never said it was just the Chinese.  But it appears many are from China based upon this article. Also, those from other countries who are on 4 hour per week Ed Visa's are not called "tourists".  But this articles seems to imply Chinse who are on Ed Visa's are tourists? As usual in LOS: Clear as mud.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sqwakvfr said:

I never said it was just the Chinese.  But it appears many are from China based upon this article. Also, those from other countries who are on 4 hour per week Ed Visa's are not called "tourists".  But this articles seems to imply Chinse who are on Ed Visa's are tourists? As usual in LOS: Clear as mud.

 

The article talks about a specific group of people (Chinese) who are taking advantage of staying for 90 days studying Muoy Thai on a non-ED visa.

 

It is not an advertisement for, or an endorsement of, the visa.

 

You "never said it was just the Chinese", but you strongly suggested that you thought you wouldn't qualify for such a visa because you're not Chinese. Which is exactly the same thing...

 

4 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

I am not from China so probably not.

 

48 minutes ago, JayClay said:

(nothing)

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JayClay said:

 

The article talks about a specific group of people (Chinese) who are taking advantage of staying for 90 days studying Muoy Thai on a non-ED visa.

 

It is not an advertisement for, or an endorsement of, the visa.

 

You "never said it was just the Chinese", but you strongly suggested that you thought you wouldn't qualify for such a visa because you're not Chinese. Which is exactly the same thing...

 

 

 

Do you undestand or appreciate sarcasm? I never said it was an endorsement of any visa.  I had a neighbor from Canada who is in his mid 60's asked about a Muay Thai Visa from a local gym. The gym advised him to pursue another type of visa.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

Do you undestand or appreciate sarcasm? I never said it was an endorsement of any visa.  I had a neighbor from Canada who is in his mid 60's asked about a Muay Thai Visa from a local gym. The gym advised him to pursue another type of visa.  

 

Yes I understand sarcasm. I don't see how it applies in this particular case. Perhaps you would like to explain how that remark fits the definition.

 

I don't know how a gym (rather than a school) advising your neighbour (who was over 50 so had at least one better option available to him) to pursue a different visa type has anything to do with whatever point you're trying to make?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/6/2024 at 10:06 AM, webfact said:

A group of Chinese tourists kickstarted Thailand’s tourism revival over the weekend under the Non-Immigrant ED Visa. The visa, nicknamed the "Non-Ed Visa", allows tourists to stay for 90 days and participate in Muay Thai classes, significantly longer than the previous 60-day limit. 

A group of Chinese tourists.......tourism revival.......Non ED Visa allows tourists.

Funny I always thought when on an ED Visa you need to participate in an "Education" activity not act as tourists.

What's next a Non-Imm "B" tourist visa to allow them to work as tour guides.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, JayClay said:

 

Yes I understand sarcasm. I don't see how it applies in this particular case. Perhaps you would like to explain how that remark fits the definition.

 

I don't know how a gym (rather than a school) advising your neighbour (who was over 50 so had at least one better option available to him) to pursue a different visa type has anything to do with whatever point you're trying to make?

I was being sarcastic in my statement.  Did not say anything about the article being sarcastic.  My point is an Ed Visa has been used by some or many as an excucse to stay in LOS for longer periods than Tourist Visas.  Also, some Muay Gyms are also "schools" and can  apply Ed Visa for a prospective student. 

Edited by sqwakvfr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, sqwakvfr said:

I was being sarcastic in my statement.  Did not say anything about the article being sarcastic.  My point is an Ed Visa has been used by some or many as an excucse to stay in LOS for longer periods than Tourist Visas.  

 

You have serious reading comprehension issues. I did not ask you why the article was sarcastic. I asked you how you saying "can I do the same? Probably not, I'm not Chinese" manages to 'sarcastically' make your point about ED visas being used to stay in LOS long term?

 

Your 'sarcastic' question refers to the issue of the visa, not the continued use. So the two points aren't even related.

 

10 hours ago, sqwakvfr said:

Also, some Muay Gyms are also "schools" and can  apply Ed Visa for a prospective student. 

 

Yes. A tiny percentage do.

 

If the gym your friend went to was such a school, then they gave him good advice that there are better visa options available for him; saving him a decent chunk of money in the process.

 

If they gym wasn't a registered school then they would obviously not want to push your friend to a competing school, so they would obviously suggest to look for alternative visa options to prevent losing a customer.

 

In either case, what is your point? And how does it relate to the original quote that I called you out on?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, JayClay said:

 

You have serious reading comprehension issues. I did not ask you why the article was sarcastic. I asked you how you saying "can I do the same? Probably not, I'm not Chinese" manages to 'sarcastically' make your point about ED visas being used to stay in LOS long term?

 

Your 'sarcastic' question refers to the issue of the visa, not the continued use. So the two points aren't even related.

 

 

Yes. A tiny percentage do.

 

If the gym your friend went to was such a school, then they gave him good advice that there are better visa options available for him; saving him a decent chunk of money in the process.

 

If they gym wasn't a registered school then they would obviously not want to push your friend to a competing school, so they would obviously suggest to look for alternative visa options to prevent losing a customer.

 

In either case, what is your point? And how does it relate to the original quote that I called you out on?

 

 

Yes. I gusee you are right. I must have a reading comprehension prolbme.  

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/6/2024 at 2:37 PM, Gknrd said:

Thailand bet 100% on China taking over the world.

 

It's a very good bet. The mad brute, the US, is going down, which is a good thing. Everybody loves China because they want to make everybody rich without interfering in national politics.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...