Jump to content
Login with your Gmail HERE and start posting in seconds! ×
Don't just read! Be part of the Community! Join the conversation ×

Trump Hints at Potential Prosecution of Political Opponents if Re-Elected

Social Media

By Social Media
in World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 502
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

thaibeachlovers
thaibeachlovers

Having opened the door to prosecuting a former president, the Dems can hardly complain if Biden is investigated and prosecuted if crimes are found. Perhaps they thought that only they could do so

Tug
Tug

That’s nothing new from trump he’s been threatening that for some time……what frightens me is the rest of the spineless republicans to terrified to call him on it!

Chomper Higgot
Chomper Higgot

The Republicans in Congress have been spending millions looking for crimes, they found non and did no legislation while looking.

Posted Images

  • Popular Post
Roo Island Platinum Member

Roo Island

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
32 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

Digging deeper and deeper into the cult of personality - incomprehensible. Just read Republican representatives booed Capital police who were present on Jan 6th who were being recognised by the Pennsylvanian State House. Goes to show the awful influence of trump, yet you and others still support him. trump is utterly unfit to represent the Office of the President of the USA.

 

Officers who defended the Capitol on Jan. 6 booed at Pennsylvania state House. Republicans jeered at former Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn and former U.S. Capitol Police Sgt. Aquilino Gonell as they were visiting the state House.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/officers-defended-capitol-jan-6-booed-pennsylvania-state-house-rcna155964

 

Will not respond any further to you.

So much for the party of law and order. BS.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stoner Star Member

stoner

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

Faux news isn't an outlet known for reliable information. Quite the contrary. Sad so many fall for it

 

again you did not answer. is the information provided in the link correct or not ? that's all that matters. 

  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GroveHillWanderer Platinum Member

GroveHillWanderer

Posted
Posted
On 6/6/2024 at 5:54 PM, stoner said:

if you say so. he is up on charges that can bring 25 years in prison. not exactly a small sentence for what you are claiming is a small issue.

 

i wonder when the next mass shooting happens will you cry for less regulation. 

I didn't claim it's a small issue. I provided evidence that Lindsey Graham thinks it's something not worth pursuing and that the data shows it's an offence that's very rarely prosecuted. I didn't express any opinion on it myself. 

 

Nor did I say or even imply that there should be less regulation.

 

Reading comprehension does not seem to be your strong suit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
candide Star Member

candide

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, stoner said:

 

you are splitting hairs now. 

No. Agents represent their administration, not ex-agents.

 

And it did actually present earmarks of Russian disinformation: laptop content brought up by Giuliani, known for his contacts with Russian agents in Ukraine; copy of laptop given only to the NYPost shortly before the election, so no one could check it, etc....

 

It looks like Giuliani had done all he could to suggest it was a Russian disinformation. 😀

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stoner Star Member

stoner

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

I didn't claim it's a small issue. I provided evidence that Lindsey Graham thinks it's something not worth pursuing and that the data shows it's an offence that's very rarely prosecuted. I didn't express any opinion on it myself. 

 

Nor did I say or even imply that there should be less regulation.

 

Reading comprehension does not seem to be your strong suit.

 

you were pushing his words... same thing. no one said you implied less regulation. i asked a question. seems we both have comprehension issues eh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stoner Star Member

stoner

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, candide said:

No. Agents represent their administration, not ex-agents.

 

And it did actually present earmarks of Russian disinformation: laptop content brought up by Giuliani, known for his contacts with Russian agents in Ukraine; copy of laptop given only to the NYPost shortly before the election, so no one could check it, etc....

 

It looks like Giuliani had done all he could to suggest it was a Russian disinformation. 😀

 

that is your opinion regarding earmarks due to your political leanings. fact is that the laptop is very damning. that's all that matters. 

 

i wonder what else is going to come from it. interesting times ahead indeed. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
candide Star Member

candide

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, stoner said:

 

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/biden-campaign-blinken-orchestrated-intel-letter-discredit-hunter-biden-laptop

What a joke! Jim Jordan was caught lying about it by editing the testimony! 😀

Here's the unedited part of the testimony in which Morrel replies to Jim Jordan.

 

https://www.politicususa.com/2023/04/21/jim-jordan-just-got-busted-with-evidence-of-his-hunter-biden-lies.html/amp

 

 

Jordan-Blinken-testimony-lie-768x988.jpg

Edited by candide
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
candide Star Member

candide

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

that is your opinion regarding earmarks due to your political leanings. fact is that the laptop is very damning. that's all that matters. 

 

i wonder what else is going to come from it. interesting times ahead indeed. 

What I have mentioned are facts.

 

BTW  very damning about what, exactly?

Edited by candide
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stoner Star Member

stoner

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, candide said:

What a joke! Jim Jordan was caught lying about by editing the testimony! 😀

Here's the unedited part of the testimony in which Morrel replies to Jim Jordan.

 

https://www.politicususa.com/2023/04/21/jim-jordan-just-got-busted-with-evidence-of-his-hunter-biden-lies.html/amp

 

 

Jordan-Blinken-testimony-lie-768x988.jpg

 

hahah it's not my memory that he said that. 

 

ok. 

 

plus 404 on your link. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stoner Star Member

stoner

Posted
Posted
Just now, candide said:

What I have mentioned are facts.

 

BTW  very damning about what, exactly?

 

what you mentioned is your opinion not fact. you think that it has the earmarks of russian bla bla bla. that's it. you think it. doesn't make it so. 

 

very damning that for years dems blabbed on about laptop this and laptop that as bs. numerous threads on here with loads of comments from dems going on and on about how the laptop is not real or russian garbage. now we know it is true and the laptop is real. it exists and has damning information on it. 

 

those are the facts. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
candide Star Member

candide

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

hahah it's not my memory that he said that. 

 

ok. 

 

plus 404 on your link. 

I guess your memory is Jim Jordan's tweet editing the testimony. 😀

 

No 404 about this link, I just checked. Plenty of other articles available, too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roo Island Platinum Member

Roo Island

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, stoner said:

 

again you did not answer. is the information provided in the link correct or not ? that's all that matters. 

I asked you for the information and all you provided was a link to a dodgy media outlet. I've yet to see definitive proof of what was on the laptop. Just a bunch of conspiracy theories from wacky right wing media outlets

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roo Island Platinum Member

Roo Island

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

what you mentioned is your opinion not fact. you think that it has the earmarks of russian bla bla bla. that's it. you think it. doesn't make it so. 

 

very damning that for years dems blabbed on about laptop this and laptop that as bs. numerous threads on here with loads of comments from dems going on and on about how the laptop is not real or russian garbage. now we know it is true and the laptop is real. it exists and has damning information on it. 

 

those are the facts. 

 

 

Not the facts at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stoner Star Member

stoner

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

I asked you for the information and all you provided was a link to a dodgy media outlet. I've yet to see definitive proof of what was on the laptop. Just a bunch of conspiracy theories from wacky right wing media outlets

 

was the dodgy link not also put up by the US government site ? 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roo Island Platinum Member

Roo Island

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, stoner said:

 

was the dodgy link not also put up by the US government site ? 

By a committee run by nutter Republicans. And just a copy from Faux News. Wow...missed that one I guess?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stoner Star Member

stoner

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

I've yet to see definitive proof of what was on the laptop.

 

coming soon don't worry. now that it is established that the laptop is in fact real and is being used as evidence against the felony charged fiend addict son of the president. (see how i did that)

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stoner Star Member

stoner

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

By a committee run by nutter Republicans. And just a copy from Faux News. Wow...missed that one I guess?

 

your opinion noted. no i did not miss that. as i am fully aware and my response has shown so. smh. 

 

 

Edited by stoner
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roo Island Platinum Member

Roo Island

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

coming soon don't worry. now that it is established that the laptop is in fact real and is being used as evidence against the felony charged fiend addict son of the president. (see how i did that)

They did an extensive review of the laptop. It's passed through so many hands that there is no way to verify what is or was on it.

 

P.S. you won't read that on Faux News

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stoner Star Member

stoner

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

They did an extensive review of the laptop. It's passed through so many hands that there is no way to verify what is or was on it.

 

P.S. you won't read that on Faux News

 

Let the excuses been. You sound like a trumper now. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roo Island Platinum Member

Roo Island

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, stoner said:

 

hahah it's not my memory that he said that. 

 

ok. 

 

plus 404 on your link. 

https://www.politicususa.com/2023/04/21/jim-jordan-just-got-busted-with-evidence-of-his-hunter-biden-lies.html/amp

 

Jim Jordan Just Got Busted With Evidence Of His Hunter Biden Lies

 

Jim Jordan and House Judiciary Republicans got caught editing witness interviews to smear the Sec. of State and push their Hunter Biden laptop scandal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
candide Star Member

candide

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, stoner said:

 

hahah it's not my memory that he said that. 

 

ok. 

 

plus 404 on your link. 

Here's Jim Jordan's tweet. You can easily see on the second page that he put together two unrelated parts of the transcript (one being from the part I posted before).

 

Lol! It's so obvious. The loser is not even able to edit it properly. 😀

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roo Island Platinum Member

Roo Island

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, candide said:

Here's Jim Jordan's tweet. You can easily see on the second page that he put together two unrelated parts of the transcript (one being from the part I posted before).

 

Lol! It's so obvious. The loser is not even able to edit it properly. 😀

 

 

Jordan is a horrible politician. Stunning anyone likes him

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""