Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:


I agree. I can provide you with numerous statements by specialists, in the fields of infectious diseases, virology and vaccine development, who have negative views on the Covid response. They have been censored for four years and their views were never taken into account. What is your take on that?

Bring it on. If they have been censored, it's for good reasons.

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Roo Island said:

Bring it on. If they have been censored, it's for good reasons.


We have now established that the prerequisite is not to be a doctor and/or scientist, but to be a doctor and/or scientist who says the things which will not get them censored.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, rattlesnake said:


We have now established that the prerequisite is not to be a doctor and/or scientist, but to be a doctor and/or scientist who says the things which will not get them censored.

Link...or BS

  • Confused 1
Posted
2 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Like I said, no conspiracy theories.

 

"Anthony Fauci, who led the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases throughout the pandemic, said the decision to close schools was correct – but they should have reopened sooner."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/06/19/us-covid-anthony-fauci-one-year-schools-closure-mistake/

https://archive.ph/nlDpt

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, john donson said:

why this dude is not in prison for mass fraud and death of millions of people

 

lab leak, illegal involvement in the gain of function, lying to congress, getting 'royalties' for live for lying, cheating

Got any actual evidence to support your claim that Fauci committed crimes? I doubt it. Your nonsense about royalites for instance. By law, NIH researchers are allowed to receive royalties for research they do. Most of the royalties actually go directly to the government. 

https://www.science.org/content/article/bad-math-nih-researchers-didn-t-pocket-710-million-royalties-during-pandemic

  • Haha 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Bring it on. If they have been censored, it's for good reasons.

 

What would they be?

Posted
10 hours ago, rattlesnake said:


I agree. I can provide you with numerous statements by specialists, in the fields of infectious diseases, virology and vaccine development, who have negative views on the Covid response. They have been censored for four years and their views were never taken into account. What is your take on that?

 A pity that reality has proven these alleged experts wrong. The data on  the actual results of covid vaccination is overwhelmingly positive.

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, riclag said:


You can help stop the spread by getting the vaccine! Fauci & Mayor of DC go spreading disinformation . Start watching the door to door knocking  from 2:30 on.The guy towards the end shut the fear mongers of fauci & bowers down, they walked away with their tails between their legs.

 

 

 

June 2021 and he still didn't know FA!!? 

  • Love It 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, placeholder said:

 A pity that reality has proven these alleged experts wrong. The data on  the actual results of covid vaccination is overwhelmingly positive.

 

And some of the data is outright frightening. The guy at 4:55 was spot on.

  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
10 hours ago, rattlesnake said:


For every link I would post, there would be 10 "fact checks" or Wikipedia entries asserting why it is crazy conspiracy.

 

As you very rightly said in your previous post, censorship is always for good reason… Good reason usually decided unilaterally in a top-down manner. The same "good reason" which censored criticism of school closures or concerns that Astrazeneca vaccines can cause blood clots.

Link? Or BS...

  • Haha 1
Posted
10 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

be a doctor and/or scientist who says the things which will not get them censored.

 

There were a few at the beginning speaking out  and to their credit are still speaking out despite being threatened with their medical licence,censored,defamed de-bunked and called fringe conspiracy theorists..bravo to all those who spoke out.

 

Now a few years later there are also others that were all for the "treatments"  but have since changed their tune after they themself or  someone they know was injured somehow they too are now "fringe" 🤢

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, riclag said:


You can help stop the spread by getting the vaccine! Fauci & Mayor of DC go spreading disinformation . Start watching the door to door knocking  from 2:30 on.The guy towards the end shut the fear mongers of fauci & bowers down, they walked away with their tails between their legs.

 

 

Sad times when some don't understand science and don't listen to doctors. Vaccine hesitancy killed thousands.

 

I could put up dozens of these. Social media. One of the top problems in society today.

 

https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/09/09/1035489298/tiktok-covid-vaccination-megan-blankenbiller-hospital

 

Before Dying, An Unvaccinated TikTok User Begged Others Not to Repeat Her Mistake

Posted
7 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

 

Like I said, no conspiracy theories.

 

"Anthony Fauci, who led the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases throughout the pandemic, said the decision to close schools was correct – but they should have reopened sooner."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/06/19/us-covid-anthony-fauci-one-year-schools-closure-mistake/

https://archive.ph/nlDpt

 

The point I was making was that those who voiced criticism of lockdowns were censored, in the name of the fight against "conspiracy theories" or "disinformation". Therefore, it is notable when those who were at the helm of this censorship end up de facto admitting that the people they censored were actually right.

Mark Zuckerberg Says Facebook Censored ‘True’ Covid Claims at Request of Health Establishment

Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook parent company Meta, said in a recent interview that the scientific “establishment” asked the social media site to censor “misinformation” related to Covid-19 that ultimately turned out to be true.


https://www.nationalreview.com/news/mark-zuckerberg-says-facebook-censored-true-covid-claims-at-request-of-health-establishment/

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
1 minute ago, rattlesnake said:

 

The point I was making was that those who voiced criticism of lockdowns were censored, in the name of the fight against "conspiracy theories" or "disinformation". Therefore, it is notable when those who were at the helm of this censorship end up de facto admitting that the people they censored were actually right.

Mark Zuckerberg Says Facebook Censored ‘True’ Covid Claims at Request of Health Establishment

Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook parent company Meta, said in a recent interview that the scientific “establishment” asked the social media site to censor “misinformation” related to Covid-19 that ultimately turned out to be true.


https://www.nationalreview.com/news/mark-zuckerberg-says-facebook-censored-true-covid-claims-at-request-of-health-establishment/

Zuckerberg only cares about making money. Hardly a credible source.

 

https://www.npr.org/2021/07/13/1015483097/an-ugly-truth-how-facebook-enables-hate-and-disinformation

 

Reporters Reveal 'Ugly Truth' Of How Facebook Enables Hate Groups And Disinformation

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

The point I was making was that those who voiced criticism of lockdowns were censored, in the name of the fight against "conspiracy theories" or "disinformation". Therefore, it is notable when those who were at the helm of this censorship end up de facto admitting that the people they censored were actually right.

Mark Zuckerberg Says Facebook Censored ‘True’ Covid Claims at Request of Health Establishment

Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook parent company Meta, said in a recent interview that the scientific “establishment” asked the social media site to censor “misinformation” related to Covid-19 that ultimately turned out to be true.


https://www.nationalreview.com/news/mark-zuckerberg-says-facebook-censored-true-covid-claims-at-request-of-health-establishment/

Still waiting for you to connect the below. 

 

"Anthony Fauci, who led the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases throughout the pandemic, said the decision to close schools was correct – but they should have reopened sooner."

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

Zuckerberg only cares about making money. Hardly a credible source.

 

https://www.npr.org/2021/07/13/1015483097/an-ugly-truth-how-facebook-enables-hate-and-disinformation

 

Reporters Reveal 'Ugly Truth' Of How Facebook Enables Hate Groups And Disinformation

 

You are completely missing the point. Facebook complied to government-steered censorship, which was multifaceted. Another example from the UK:

Ministers' had 'chilling' secret unit to curb lockdown dissent

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/government-secret-unit-covid-lockdown-b2350647.html

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:


Okay, I will simplify to the extreme.

 

2020-2021:
Government says "close schools for most of the year".

Critics say "it will do more harm than good, they should be reopened".

Government says "it is anti-science speech and misinformation".

2024:

Government says "we should not have closed schools for most of the year".

Let me dumb it down even further: Your initial post:

 

"That's the interview where Fauci finally admits that closing schools for a year during Covid was a mistake. It only took Mister I Am The Science 4 years to admit that 'conspiracy theorists' (and Trump) were right."

 

You reference to Conspiracy theorists is nothing to do with the statement made by Fauci. That's you trying to make something of nothing.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Let me dumb it down even further: Your initial post:

 

"That's the interview where Fauci finally admits that closing schools for a year during Covid was a mistake. It only took Mister I Am The Science 4 years to admit that 'conspiracy theorists' (and Trump) were right."

 

You reference to Conspiracy theorists is nothing to do with the statement made by Fauci. That's you trying to make something of nothing.


And your response was:

There were no conspiracy theories around closing schools, it happened in most countries in the world. The fact that they are now saying it was a mistake to keep them closed for so long says what?

You thought I was referring to an actual conspiracy, when I was only referring to the term "conspiracy theorist" and its use as a lever of censorship. This initial misunderstanding has led you astray in your subsequent interpretations.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...