Jump to content

Trump's pick of JD Vance a hopefully fatal mistake for his maga fascist movement


Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, susanlea said:

That's how people from the left argue these days. When they disagree with people they pull out the fascist card etc. It just makes them look stupid.

Yet most left here when discussing issues pull out the supported fact card.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You think JD Vance will be the GOP nominee in 2028?

 

What are you drinking?

If Trump takes power again he won't ever leave the white house while alive although he may move the white house to Margarine Lardo.

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

If Trump takes power again he won't ever leave the white house while alive although he may move the white house to Margarine Lardo.

Stop trolling.

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Yes, but under Project 2025, people that cannot afford Medicare Advantage will be subsidizes. 

 

And you know that Biden and now Kamala both want to mean test Social Security, so wealthy business owners like you won't get it. 

 

What is evil is people like you that misrepresent the truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

You obviously haven't actually studied the Project 2025 agenda. It's a blueprint for American fascism. You're one of those "it can't happen here (USA)" denialists. Of course it can. It is happening. Even defeating Trump won't be the end of their movement.

Racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump said he wins, there won't be any more elections.

 

He also said he would be a dictator from Day One.

Both statements are not true, but that's all you have. 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

So, do you approve of Project 2025?

We have already talked about this. Yes, there are good things in Project 2025.

 

And I have debunked your objections. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TedG said:

We have already talked about this. Yes, there are good things in Project 2025.

 

And I have debunked your objections. 

I have plenty of objections about Project 2025's Fascist agenda.

 

It is so bad, Trump had to order the head of the project to be fired.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I have plenty of objections about Project 2025's Fascist agenda.

 

It is so bad, Trump had to order the head of the project to be fired.

You have yet to explain how it’s fascist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TedG said:

You have yet to explain how it’s fascist. 

Giving the president operational control over DOJ prosecutions is a Fascist policy. It means that POTUS can imprison political opponents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I have plenty of objections about Project 2025's Fascist agenda.

 

It is so bad, Trump had to order the head of the project to be fired.

Once again you know all the party buzz words... but where is the substance of your accusations... what is fascist and why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

You mean like joe and the cabal are doing to trump???

There is no evidence that Joe Biden has operational control over DOJ.

 

If so, explain why DOJ is prosecuting Hunter Biden.

 

Explain why there was a Republican DOJ prosecutor investigating Joe Biden over classified documents.

 

You seem very confused.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

There is no evidence that Joe Biden has operational control over DOJ.

 

If so, explain why DOJ is prosecuting Hunter Biden.

 

Explain why there was a Republican DOJ prosecutor investigating Joe Biden over classified documents.

 

You seem very confused.

Does the Attorney General report to, and serve at the pleasure of the President, yes or no? 

 

When the President makes comment to the press, the AG knows how they are to proceed. 

 

"Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?"

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""