Biden Speech From Oval Office Withdrew from Reelection to Unite Democrats

[thaibeachlovers]

26 minutes ago, stevenl said:

At no point did I claim she was democratically elected.
So your comment has no bearing on my post.

If you did not mean that she was democratically elected, just what does

 

51 minutes ago, stevenl said:

You're really worried when you start complaining about the democratic process in the opposing party.

 

mean?

Either she was democratically elected or she was not.

[BigStar]

1 minute ago, Eric Loh said:

Voters in the primary cast ballots for delegates to the convention who were pledged to Biden but who are now 'unbound'by Biden withdrawal

 

A legalism convenient for the elites. Harris hasn't received a single vote from the actual voters.

 

2 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

That will allow them to vote for another person at the DNC.

 

Oh, only at the DNC, heh heh.😁 NO primary and primary debate to vet candidates and allow voters to choose the best, which Kamala obviously isn't.

[JonnyF]

9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

A very odd thing to say in a thread discussing President Biden’s televised speech.

 

But it it’s at least puts the all your other comments in this thread into their correct context, uninformed off topic nonsense.

 

Call that a speech?

 

He was barely able to read from a teleprompter. 

[Eric Loh]

Just now, BigStar said:

 

A legalism convenient for the elites. Harris hasn't received a single vote from the actual voters.

 

 

Oh, only at the DNC, heh heh.😁 NO primary and primary debate to vet candidates and allow voters to choose the best, which Kamala obviously isn't.

Your comprehension of the matter is abysmal. 

[BigStar]

28 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Country, the constitution, democracy and freedom first and above personal ambitio

 

Actually a threat by the party dons to invoke the 25th Amendment and forcibly remove him. Hence he didn't mention the specific reason he suddenly changed his mind, adamant before. If he was the best then, why not now? If he's doing such a great job now, why not continue?

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

Call that a speech?

 

He was barely able to read from a teleprompter. 

Opinions differ.

 

Meanwhile you confirming you hadn’t watched a speech you were engaged in discussing is a matter of record in the thread.

 

 

[thaibeachlovers]

17 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

When a week before he claimed only god could stop him.

 

I wonder what he'll say next week?

 

This man's for turning... 

This man's for turning... 

 

"twisting in the wind" could have been written just for Joe.

[Chomper Higgot]

Just now, BigStar said:

 

Actually a threat by the party dons to invoke the 25th Amendment and forcibly remove him. Hence he didn't mention the specific reason he suddenly changed his mind, adamant before. If he was the best then, why not now? If he's doing such a great job now, why not continue?

You have a credible link to this threat of the 25th Amendment?

[BigStar]

1 minute ago, Eric Loh said:

Your comprehension of the matter is abysmal. 

 

Merely means you like the Dem machine, 'cause it's them. Typical liberal assertions of unquestioned superiority won't get you anywhere. Meanwhile, Harris is even worse than Biden.

[thaibeachlovers]

4 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Call that a speech?

 

He was barely able to read from a teleprompter. 

IMO in places he didn't. He's so far gone one wonders how they are going to pretend he's capable of being POTUS till January?

 

At what point do the interests of the country trump the desires of a confused old man to be important? Lets have Harris show us what a Harris presidency will look like, or is that why they have to prop Biden up for a few more months, as they know if she does take over it'll be a Trump landslide?

[BigStar]

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You have a credible link to this threat of the 25th Amendment?

 

Highly credible insider placed highly in the admin. Didn't dare reveal his name for obvious reason. But the fake news relies on anonymous sources all the time, and you love it when they do.

[JonnyF]

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Meanwhile you confirming you hadn’t watched a speech you were engaged in discussing is a matter of record in the thread.

 

 

Oh dear, Chomps is doing her best lawyer impersonation. 

 

"A matter of record in this thread" 😃.

 

I think you might be taking this all a bit too seriously 😙.

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

Just now, JonnyF said:

 

Oh dear, Chomps is doing her best lawyer impersonation. 

 

"A matter of record in this thread" 😃.

 

I think you might be taking this all a bit too seriously 😙.

 

 

Sorry Jonny, just pointing out facts.

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, BigStar said:

 

Highly credible insider placed highly in the admin. Didn't dare reveal his name for obvious reason. But the fake news relies on anonymous sources all the time, and you love it when they do.

That’ll be a no then.

[thaibeachlovers]

5 minutes ago, BigStar said:

 

Actually a threat by the party dons to invoke the 25th Amendment and forcibly remove him. Hence he didn't mention the specific reason he suddenly changed his mind, adamant before. If he was the best then, why not now? If he's doing such a great job now, why not continue?

If they remove him, Harris has to be put in place, and I bet that is the last thing they want voters to see.

[JonnyF]

1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

IMO in places he didn't. He's so far gone one wonders how they are going to pretend he's capable of being POTUS till January?

 

It's certainly not very democractic to have someone in his condition pretending to run the country. It makes you wonder who is.

 

1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

 

At what point do the interests of the country trump the desires of a confused old man to be important? Lets have Harris show us what a Harris presidency will look like, or is that why they have to prop Biden up for a few more months, as they know if she does take over it'll be a Trump landslide?

 

Exactly. It would be a perfect opportunity for her to showcase her skills, if she had any.

 

Actually I take that back, I'm sure she has skills. Willie Brown would attest to that. But not the type required for President. 

[EVENKEEL]

37 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Ok watched the speech.

 

A true statesman.

 

Country, the constitution, democracy and freedom first and above personal ambition.

 

 

 

Guess Biden telling the American the reason he's not running again would be embarrassing.

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

It's certainly not very democractic to have someone in his condition pretending to run the country. It makes you wonder who is.

 

 

Exactly. It would be a perfect opportunity for her to showcase her skills, if she had any.

 

Actually I take that back, I'm sure she has skills. Willie Brown would attest to that. But not the type required for President. 

More snide innuendo.

 

You’re on a roll 

[BigStar]

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Opinions differ.

 

Only the most brainwashed wouldn't believe his eyes and ears:

 

 

It's like that dialog in 1984:

 

How many fingers am l holding up?

 

Four.

And if the Party says there are not four,
but five, then how many?

Five.

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

4 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Guess Biden telling the American the reason he's not running again would be embarrassing.

Not quite as embarrassing as you trying to produce evidence he didn’t do just that.

[BigStar]

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That’ll be a no then.

 

Still a yes. Seems obvious, really.

[riclag]

So dishonest, So corrupt, So incompetent, So disenfranchising!

So Dem Democracy!

Before she changed her mind ,Aoc says Joe is running ,case closed ,

as others In the Dem party such as 

Marianne Williamson calls out the sham perpetrators.

 

 

Edited July 25 by riclag

[JonnyF]

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

More snide innuendo.

 

You’re on a roll 

 

That she had an affair with the married Big Willie Brown who later admitted helping her get political positions is a matter of fact.

[EVENKEEL]

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Not quite as embarrassing as you trying to produce evidence he didn’t do just that.

Also embarrassing for those who kept telling the Americans that Biden is focused and sharp. 

 

 

[BigStar]

12 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Actually I take that back, I'm sure she has skills. Willie Brown would attest to that. But not the type required for President. 

 

As Maxine Waters just said, Harris did everything right to get where she is.

[Eric Loh]

11 minutes ago, BigStar said:

 

Merely means you like the Dem machine, 'cause it's them. Typical liberal assertions of unquestioned superiority won't get you anywhere. Meanwhile, Harris is even worse than Biden.

 I meant no disrespect to you. What I am saying given the history of primaries for Presidential candidate, your knowledge is shallow. There were no primaries prior to 1972. Then it was brokered conventions before 1972. Will that mean that US weren't a democracy until 1972 ? Most other developed countries do not have primaries. Are they undemocratic? This is just Rep talking point that has little merit. 

[riclag]

9 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

That she had an affair with the married Big Willie Brown who later admitted helping her get political positions is a matter of fact.

Willie was asked about kharris becoming POTUS,Its Historic .

 

Asked about the convention ,

Its not a open process!

 

[JonnyF]

4 minutes ago, riclag said:

Willie was asked about kharris becoming POTUS,Its Historic .

 

Asked about the convention ,

Its not a open process!

 

 

An interesting watch. So basically they will drop all their Democratic principles and processes if they think Harris can beat Trump.

 

Just as I thought. 

[BigStar]

1 minute ago, Eric Loh said:

 I meant no disrespect to you. What I am saying given the history of primaries for Presidential candidate, your knowledge is shallow. There were no primaries prior to 1972. Then it was brokered conventions before 1972. Will that mean that US weren't a democracy until 1972 ? Most other developed countries do not have primaries. Are they undemocratic? This is just Rep talking point that has little merit. 

 

Irrelevant, of course, and mere gaslighting. The USA does have televised primaries because they're a great democratic way for voters to judge the candidates for themselves and then vote accordingly. Kamala, deeply unpopular, is merely being installed by the party machine. Tulsi Gabbard destroyed her in the only primary she was in. And so would other better Dem candidates today.

 

But your rules don't obligate the DNC to install Kamala. There's time for a primary to let the real voters decide. IF they wanted real democracy as those hypocrites claim, they'd hold a primary. They want their DEI woman in there. She'll do what they tell her to do, just like Biden.

 

[Eric Loh]

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

An interesting watch. So basically they will drop all their Democratic principles and processes if they think Harris can beat Trump.

 

Just as I thought. 

Doesn't bother me. Harris can beat Trump all I matter. Is there a quivering in your post that Harris will beat Trump.