President Kamala Harris

[Yellowtail]

 

Laura: Kamala Harris is trying to 'turn the page' on reputation as 'open border zealot' | Watch (msn.com)

[bunnydrops]

On 9/26/2024 at 6:38 AM, Yellowtail said:

Sixteen leftist Nobel laureates...

OK, do you want to match with 16 from the right?

[Yellowtail]

On 9/28/2024 at 10:01 AM, bunnydrops said:

OK, do you want to match with 16 from the right?

That's hilarious 

[Sigmund]

I don't really like Trump.

 

But my pension manager in Europe and his colleagues who know their stuff were all unanimous. Under Trump's term, all the yields in investment portfolio's (that pay our pensions), made profits like never before.

 

Trump is a businessman who knows how to make money for him and for others.  Consequently he does not need to generate wars to sell weapons and get kickbacks from the arms lobby. He knows the semiology of the markets and thus knows what political orientations to take and decisions to make.

 

One may not like the individual, but compared to Harris, he knows that making money, doing business and making profit for all, definately does not match with generating and funding wars all over the world like the Biden Harris and cronies are doing since their arrival at office.

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, Sigmund said:

I don't really like Trump.

 

But my pension manager in Europe and his colleagues who know their stuff were all unanimous. Under Trump's term, all the yields in investment portfolio's (that pay our pensions), made profits like never before.

 

Trump is a businessman who knows how to make money for him and for others.  Consequently he does not need to generate wars to sell weapons and get kickbacks from the arms lobby. He knows the semiology of the markets and thus knows what political orientations to take and decisions to make.

 

One may not like the individual, but compared to Harris, he knows that making money, doing business and making profit for all, definately does not match with generating and funding wars all over the world like the Biden Harris and cronies are doing since their arrival at office.

The US stock market doubled in value under Biden, but crashed under Trump.

 

Your pension manager must be losing his marbles.

[Yellowtail]

10 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

The US stock market doubled in value under Biden, but crashed under Trump.

 

Your pension manager must be losing his marbles.

Yeah, the rich are doing great under Biden.

[newnative]

11 hours ago, Sigmund said:

I don't really like Trump.

 

But my pension manager in Europe and his colleagues who know their stuff were all unanimous. Under Trump's term, all the yields in investment portfolio's (that pay our pensions), made profits like never before.

 

Trump is a businessman who knows how to make money for him and for others.  Consequently he does not need to generate wars to sell weapons and get kickbacks from the arms lobby. He knows the semiology of the markets and thus knows what political orientations to take and decisions to make.

 

One may not like the individual, but compared to Harris, he knows that making money, doing business and making profit for all, definately does not match with generating and funding wars all over the world like the Biden Harris and cronies are doing since their arrival at office.

       I can't speak to European pension fund performance but my USA stock portfolio, with mostly American stocks, has been doing great under Biden/Harris.  This year it is up $25,000, 12.82%, and recently has been hitting all-time highs.  For the past two years, it's up $51,000, 29.94%.  I started my stock portfolio in 2021, with money inherited from a family trust.  I don't know how it would have fared under Trump but I'm happy with what Biden/Harris has delivered.  

     

[Berkshire]

14 hours ago, Sigmund said:

I don't really like Trump.

 

But my pension manager in Europe and his colleagues who know their stuff were all unanimous. Under Trump's term, all the yields in investment portfolio's (that pay our pensions), made profits like never before.

 

Trump is a businessman who knows how to make money for him and for others.  Consequently he does not need to generate wars to sell weapons and get kickbacks from the arms lobby. He knows the semiology of the markets and thus knows what political orientations to take and decisions to make.

 

One may not like the individual, but compared to Harris, he knows that making money, doing business and making profit for all, definately does not match with generating and funding wars all over the world like the Biden Harris and cronies are doing since their arrival at office.

Hmmmm....I'm guessing this has to do with the massive corporate tax cut enacted by the Paul Ryan congress that Trump signed into law.  This artificially juiced the stock market but raised the budget deficit in the trillions.  And these tax cuts didn't exactly "trickle down" to the US economy as many of these companies conducted stock buybacks which helped their shareholders.  Had nothing to do with Trump's perceived "business acumen." 

Edited Monday at 03:34 AM by Berkshire

[newnative]

12 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Yeah, the rich are doing great under Biden.

       And, if you're a Republican, you should be thrilled with that.  Republicans for years have been pushing the 'trickle down' theory to support their tax cuts that mostly benefit the rich.  When the rich get richer, the benefits will trickle down to the rest of us, according to the theory  

       So, if the rich are, indeed, 'doing great under Biden', if 'trickle down' actually works, then millions of regular voters, Democrats and Republicans, should be doing great, too, with all that money trickling down to them, and they should be rewarding the Democrat ticket in the November election with their votes.  Umm.  Hang on.  Maybe the Republicans shouldn't be too thrilled . . .  

[radiogeneris]

Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Alejandro Mayorkas have put Americans last.

 

 

[gargamon]

31 minutes ago, radiogeneris said:

Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Alejandro Mayorkas have put Americans last.

 

 

Oh. Sue. Where do you get all these wierd names?

[radiogeneris]

Some fun facts about the Democrat plan to steal elections using "overseas" ballots:

 

-Through the UOCAVA/overseas program, you can register to vote online without providing ID, SSN, or proof of citizenship/address.

 

-You can register in any state, at any address, and no one verifies whether you have ever actually lived there.

 

-Many states allow you to send your ballot via email.

 

-A recent Democrat memo announced their plan to collect 9 million overseas Democrat votes. According to a federal government report, there are only 2.8 million eligible voters overseas.

 

-In 2020, the number of civilian UOCAVA votes inexplicably doubled from their normal average.

 

-The Democrats have spent 6 figures on the "vote from abroad" program the rake in more unverified civilian overseas ballots this year.

 

-In 2020, just 44,000 votes across Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin votes won Joe Biden the presidency. Democrats only need a handful of fraudulent overseas votes to steal this election.

 

link to the DNC memo announcing this plan: https://democrats.org/news/dnc-announces-innovative-six-figure-investment-in-democrats-abroad-to-ensure-engagement-of-key-voters-living-outside-u-s/

[thaibeachlovers]

1 hour ago, radiogeneris said:

Some fun facts about the Democrat plan to steal elections using "overseas" ballots:

The Dems are becoming increasingly desperate to win, IMO. Not surprising when considering the lemon candidate they got imposed on them, a person that never won any vote by the citizens to say that they wanted her as POTUS.

As time goes by the awful truth about her becomes more and more obvious, despite them keeping her hidden as much as possible.

[newnative]

6 hours ago, radiogeneris said:

Some fun facts about the Democrat plan to steal elections using "overseas" ballots:

 

-Through the UOCAVA/overseas program, you can register to vote online without providing ID, SSN, or proof of citizenship/address.

 

-You can register in any state, at any address, and no one verifies whether you have ever actually lived there.

 

-Many states allow you to send your ballot via email.

 

-A recent Democrat memo announced their plan to collect 9 million overseas Democrat votes. According to a federal government report, there are only 2.8 million eligible voters overseas.

 

-In 2020, the number of civilian UOCAVA votes inexplicably doubled from their normal average.

 

-The Democrats have spent 6 figures on the "vote from abroad" program the rake in more unverified civilian overseas ballots this year.

 

-In 2020, just 44,000 votes across Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin votes won Joe Biden the presidency. Democrats only need a handful of fraudulent overseas votes to steal this election.

 

link to the DNC memo announcing this plan: https://democrats.org/news/dnc-announces-innovative-six-figure-investment-in-democrats-abroad-to-ensure-engagement-of-key-voters-living-outside-u-s/

        You should have kept going with your red underlining and continued with 'If your state requires further information, your election official will contact you.'  That's the key part that you neglected to highlight.

        I registered on-line to vote in Virginia.  In filling out the form, I first had to select the last voting precinct in Virginia where I had been registered to vote.   They also required my last address where I lived in Virginia when I was registered to vote.  I couldn't remember my condo number since I had moved so often doing condo flips but I did remember the street address and I figured that would be enough information.

      Wrong.  That's when 'If your state requires further information . . .' came into play.  They emailed me back and told me they needed the condo number before they could process my voter application and allow me to vote.  So, after a search, I finally did find the condo number and resubmitted my application, which was approved, and I was sent out a voter ballot.

       You also highlighted the fact that a voter application will be accepted, even if an applicant doesn't include social security number, driver's license, etc.  Yes, likely so.  The application will be accepted for processing but, like my first try, not necessarily approved if there is not enough information to determine if you are eligible to vote.  

       It would have been nice if I could have then voted by email but only a few states allow this, so far.  I had to print my ballot, fill out the ballot, put the ballot in an envelope and seal it, print out and then fill out and sign a form swearing I am who I am and eligible to vote, paste this form to the envelope, put the first envelope into a second envelope, print out and paste the address form of where the ballot is to be sent to the second envelope, seal the envelope, and then go to the post office and mail it.  Since I am overseas, I also had to pay to mail the ballot, as I don't live anywhere near a US Embassy to drop it off.

      That's what I went through in order to vote.  I, for one, think the process should be easier than that, not made more difficult, so more voters don't just give up and decide not to even bother to vote--too much trouble.    If Republicans are worried that making voting easier favors Democrats, perhaps they should look at both their platform and the Presidential candidate they have been fielding for 3 elections.