Jump to content

Southport Stabbing: Child Killed and Several Injured in Taylor Swift-Themed Workshop Attack


Social Media

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

This is what we have to put up with. Mobs like this protesting about a film.

Imagine if you and the Wife fancied going to this Cinema youi would have to face this lot

 

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/8/2024 at 9:58 AM, Will B Good said:

Have I slipped into a parallel universe?

WhatsApp Image 2024-08-08 at 09.14.17 (1).jpeg

 

It seems every newspaper was given this one photo and told to run it. Similar to when every newspaper was carrying the Photo of Aylann Kurdi dead on a Turkish beach.

 

Note the pre printed signs and how many people there REALLY are in this photo . This is The Socialist Worker Rent a mob. Hope not hate gave a list of 100 supposed sites the "Far Right" would turn up to and then SWP mobilised (which they are very good at) and had people turn up and take the pre printed placards. Popular belief is the motive for turning up is the cash handout to the SWP Doleites*

 

All the entity giving this photo to the MSM have done is legitamise the SWP who are a Trotskyite Marxist organisation dedicated to overthrow of capitalism. Perhaps that was the intent.

 

Who paid for these placards?

 

A propaganda coup was staged and you fell for it. The "Far Right" didn't turn up because the list of 100 locations was a false flag by Hope not Hate, and they have admitted such.

 

*contrary to the name, members of the SWP don't actually work.

Edited by mokwit
  • Confused 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes a company produced all these placards and made a lot of money there's no way thousands want or welcome Refugees one of the big reasons was Starmers promise was to stop the boats well 800 came over a thousand crossed at the weekend with two Dying in the process. You bragged we welcome Refugees in your placards well this is what your welcoming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BarraMarra said:

Yes a company produced all these placards and made a lot of money there's no way thousands want or welcome Refugees one of the big reasons was Starmers promise was to stop the boats well 800 came over a thousand crossed at the weekend with two Dying in the process. You bragged we welcome Refugees in your placards well this is what your welcoming.

 

 

555555

 

Tories had 14 years to do something about legal and illegal immigration.....Starmer has had......???

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, James105 said:

 

...long enough to make an impact.  The 2 illegal immigrant deaths are Labour's responsibility now.   Had Reform been in power there would be 2 less dead people in the channel as they would have made an impact on this.  


Been polishing your crystal ball again?

Farage, the man who rarely bothers turning up for any official parliamentary business (he'd rather be out grifting) would have sprung in to action and stopped all small boat crossings in four weeks............if only more people (er, a LOT more) had voted for his party. Got it.

Edited by josephbloggs
  • Sad 2
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


Been polishing your crystal ball again?

Farage, the man who rarely bothers turning up for any official parliamentary business (he'd rather be out grifting) would have sprung in to action and stopped all small boat crossings in four weeks............if only more people (er, a LOT more) had voted for his party. Got it.

But he can't think beyond his car salesman handbook...Talk rollox so folk believe it.

Oh, you believe it..........:unsure:

  • Like 1
  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

Doesn't really need a crystal ball does it?  Labour in charge:

1. Remove any kind of deterrent.

2. Have a reputation from the criminal people smugglers as "the friendly man".

3. Appoint a home secretary that advertises on social media that "refugees are welcome". 

4. Literally do nothing other rename border force to border control or whatever.

5. Grant 100,000 illegal immigrants asylum (or in Labour terminology - process 100,000 claims).  

 

If people are allowed a free vote in 5 years time I imagine more people will make the effort to vote for anyone but this tyrannical Labour regime, especially the ones who didn't vote this time as they didn't think it would make any difference whether it was Tory or Labour.  

 

 

What do you mean if people are allowed a free vote in five years time?

 

Have you lost touch with reality?

 

 

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, James105 said:

 

...long enough to make an impact.  The 2 illegal immigrant deaths are Labour's responsibility now.   Had Reform been in power there would be 2 less dead people in the channel as they would have made an impact on this.  

Every promise Reform and the carpet bagging carnival barker Farage made in the run up to the election was made in the full knowledge that they would never have to deliver any of it.

 

And you believed their ‘promises’.

 

You didn’t go I their website did you? 
 

There’s an odds on chance they stole your data if you did.

 

 

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, transam said:

But he can't think beyond his car salesman handbook...Talk rollox so folk believe it.

Oh, you believe it..........:unsure:


I literally have no clue what you are on about. 

As someone else said recently, you are barely coherent these days. Are you talking about Farage? And what do I believe? Certainly not a single word that leaves his frog-like face.

Edited by josephbloggs
  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What do you mean if people are allowed a free vote in five years time?

 

Have you lost touch with reality?

 

 


He must read some really out there conspiracy sites, that's all I can say - some of his claims are beyond ludicrous.

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What do you mean if people are allowed a free vote in five years time?

 

Have you lost touch with reality?

 

 

 

The PM is a tyrant e.g

 

1. The use of police to create a visible threat to any dissent and show trials for dissenters. 

2. The use of surveillance to create paranoia

3. Social fragmentation of the population and pitting groups against each other using the imaginary "far right". 

 

He is ticking all the tyrannical boxes and he knows his government is built on a house of cards with only 20% share of the electoral vote.  I think the UK is on a very dark path.   

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


I literally have no clue what you are on about. 

As someone else said recently, you are barely coherent these days. Are you talking about Farage? And what do I believe? Certainly not a single word that leaves his frog-like face.

Good afternoon Joseph, Well, I am not surprised, you rarely understand anything, but don't worry, you crack on the best you can........:clap2:

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


1. The use of the police to put an end to rioting, property damage, arson, attacks on a completely innocent community and violent assault of the police officers, by rightwing thugs.

2. A product of your own paranoia.

3. Division in society, what are you on about? Tens of thousands of law abiding people up and down the country have taken to the streets to peacefully protest against the ‘far right’ thugs committing crimes listed in #1 above. This is not division, it’s unity of the general public against rioters committing crimes, many of whom already had previous criminal records.

 

Once again you are here defending the rioters and blaming everyone except the rightwing rioting thugs. 
 

Communities uniting against rightwing thuggery is far from ‘on a very dark path’, except of course for the rightwing thugs.

 

Give it up already, it’s over. Justice is coming for the rioters, the looters, the arsonists, and those who incited this rightwing mayhem.

 

1. Tyranny always starts with the pretense of "security" and your "safety" and then escalates from there.   

2. Just saying what I am seeing.  

3. There are more then tens of thousands of people in the UK.  There is no "far right", hence the reason no "far right" turned up to the supposed 100 organized riots by the "far right" which was a hoax (misinformation if you will) by the "far left".   "Far right" just a divisive term used by the tyrant to cause division and justify his tyrannical actions.   He won't even define what he considers to be "far right" as to do so in the context of the recent rioting would mean describing them as disaffected working class white people who get angry when little girls get murdered, not the swastika tattooed thugs that spring to mind when that term is used.   Whatever the white people did on the streets it pales into insignificance when compared to what the 2nd generation immigrant did to those girls.

  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

1. Tyranny always starts with the pretense of "security" and your "safety" and then escalates from there.   

2. Just saying what I am seeing.  

3. There are more then tens of thousands of people in the UK.  There is no "far right", hence the reason no "far right" turned up to the supposed 100 organized riots by the "far right" which was a hoax (misinformation if you will) by the "far left".   "Far right" just a divisive term used by the tyrant to cause division and justify his tyrannical actions.   He won't even define what he considers to be "far right" as to do so in the context of the recent rioting would mean describing them as disaffected working class white people who get angry when little girls get murdered, not the swastika tattooed thugs that spring to mind when that term is used.   Whatever the white people did on the streets it pales into insignificance when compared to what the 2nd generation immigrant did to those girls.

1. The rightwing banging on about the threat from immigrants is a perfect example.

 

2. I don’t dispute you believe your fears, but that doesn’t make them well founded.

 

3. Of course there’s a far right in the UK, please at least try to make sensible arguments:

 

https://crestresearch.ac.uk/download/2268/17-001-02.pdf

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

1. Tyranny always starts with the pretense of "security" and your "safety" and then escalates from there.   

2. Just saying what I am seeing.  

3. There are more then tens of thousands of people in the UK.  There is no "far right", hence the reason no "far right" turned up to the supposed 100 organized riots by the "far right" which was a hoax (misinformation if you will) by the "far left".   "Far right" just a divisive term used by the tyrant to cause division and justify his tyrannical actions.   He won't even define what he considers to be "far right" as to do so in the context of the recent rioting would mean describing them as disaffected working class white people who get angry when little girls get murdered, not the swastika tattooed thugs that spring to mind when that term is used.   Whatever the white people did on the streets it pales into insignificance when compared to what the 2nd generation immigrant did to those girls.


Ah, "second generation immigrant" is the new dehumanising term. "Immigrant" doesn't work for you because he isn't one, so it's now "second generation immigrant". Just keep on dehumanising and shoe-horning people in to your nice little generic categories. 


How far do you want to go back? WIll you looking for "third generation immigrants" next to justify your prejudices?

And what about the white boy who killed 14-year old Nathaniel Shani with a machete? Have you looked in to his immigration status - where was he from originally, what about his parents and grandparents? Oh and he wasn't named for legal reasons as he is a minor. I don't remember see you lot asking questions about the secrecy there, or coming out on to the streets to "protect our children" - because that is what it's all about, right, the children?

Technically I am a second generation immigrant as my dad arrived in England as a 15 year old. I was born in Southport, I am white, I have an "English" name. That must be troubling for you....


 

Edited by josephbloggs
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

1. The rightwing banging on about the threat from immigrants is a perfect example.

 

2. I don’t dispute you believe your fears, but that doesn’t make them well founded.

 

3. Of course there’s a far right in the UK, please at least try to make sensible arguments:

 

https://crestresearch.ac.uk/download/2268/17-001-02.pdf

What about Muslim crooks, terrorists are there any.........?

Well there must be, a Muslim bloke was nicked the other day on terrorism charges....

 

  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


Ah, "second generation immigrant" is the new dehumanising term. "Immigrant" doesn't work for you because he isn't one, so it's now "second generation immigrant". Just keep on dehumanising and shoe-horning people in to your nice little generic categories. 


How far do you want to go back? WIll you looking for "third generation immigrants" next to justify your prejudices?

And what about the white boy who killed Nathaniel Shani with a machete? Have you looked in to his immigration status - where was he from originally, what about his parents and grandparents? Oh and he wasn't named for legal reasons as he is a minor. I don't remember see you lot asking questions about the secrecy there, or coming out on to the streets to "protect our children" - because that is what it's all about, right, the children?

Technically I am a second generation immigrant as my dad arrived in England as a 15 year old. I was born in Southport, I am white, I have an "English" name. That must be troubling for you....


 

Oh, Welsh..........😂 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, transam said:

What about Muslim crooks, terrorists are there any.........?

Well there must be, a Muslim bloke was nicked the other day on terrorism charges....

 

 

This man is a bigoted ISIS supporter. He was arrested in 2016. How can an ISIS supporter get out of prison?  When do you think they'll let Axel Rudakubana, a British Christian terrorist, out of jail?   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CashMoon said:

 

This man is a bigoted ISIS supporter. He was arrested in 2016. How can an ISIS supporter get out of prison?  When do you think they'll let Axel Rudakubana, a British Christian terrorist, out of jail?   

 

Yes, my point was questioning CHiggy because as soon as far right is mentioned he starts dribbling, yet never says anything about his Muslim friends, because they are all nice people.

He dodges my questions about them, he says he never watches news videos put forward because they could be doctored...............😂.....🤣

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, transam said:

Yes, my point was questioning CHiggy because as soon as far right is mentioned he starts dribbling, yet never says anything about his Muslim friends, because they are all nice people.

He dodges my questions about them, he says he never watches news videos put forward because they could be doctored...............😂.....🤣

 

Naturally, he wants to stay on topic. The stabbing in Southport had nothing to do with Muslims. It was a lie by low IQ right wing extremists with intelligence problems. It's about a Christian Englishman born in England who kills 3 people and injures 10. It is a big loser to trigger Muslim hatred even for the crime committed by a British Christian murderer. Or are you saboteurs? Are you trying to sabotage the issue?  

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CashMoon said:

 

Naturally, he wants to stay on topic. The stabbing in Southport had nothing to do with Muslims. It was a lie by low IQ right wing extremists with intelligence problems. It's about a Christian Englishman born in England who kills 3 people and injures 10. It is a big loser to trigger Muslim hatred even for the crime committed by a British Christian murderer. Or are you saboteurs? Are you trying to sabotage the issue?  

 

 

No, brain-dead yobs came out of the woodwork to cause trouble, that's it. My points to another because for many YEARS has defended Muslims, now you can't tell me that Muslims didn't come out of their woodwork shouting "Allah Akbar", because they did....

Muslim terrorism stuff is alive and well in the UK, as well as white yobs....🤗

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, transam said:

No, brain-dead yobs came out of the woodwork to cause trouble, that's it. My points to another because for many YEARS has defended Muslims, now you can't tell me that Muslims didn't come out of their woodwork shouting "Allah Akbar", because they did....

Muslim terrorism stuff is alive and well in the UK, as well as white yobs....🤗

 

Low iQ far right threatening them with genocide must have forced them out. Maybe they don't want to die innocently like the Jews? 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...