Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png.f042890ab064bbf5197a78dd82f451d8.png

 

Huw Edwards is the latest in a long line of high-profile controversies at the BBC, raising the persistent question: will they ever learn from their mistakes? This familiar refrain greets scandal after scandal at the BBC. Lessons had to be learned after the prolific sexual abuse by Jimmy Savile was finally exposed. Again, they needed learning after the corporation was found to have covered up "deceitful behaviour" by journalist Martin Bashir to secure his Panorama interview with Princess Diana.

 

The circumstances surrounding Huw Edwards' downfall aren't entirely clear-cut

 

Lessons were the order of the day after Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross made their infamous prank call to actor Andrew Sachs. Yet, to the average licence-fee payer, dismayed but perhaps no longer shocked by the news of yet another scandal, these words risk ringing a little hollow.

 

This time, it’s Huw Edwards in the frame, and once again, the BBC itself. The corporation knew in November that their star news presenter had been arrested on suspicion of serious offences. It continued to employ him for the following five months until his resignation in April. Last year, he was the BBC’s highest-paid journalist, receiving between £475,000 and £479,999, following a £40,000 salary increase. This week, he pleaded guilty at Westminster Magistrates’ Court to three counts of making indecent images of children, bringing to a shameful end an illustrious career as the face of some of Britain’s biggest news events.

 

If it feels like we’ve been here before, that’s probably because we have. The roll call of names is now depressingly familiar. Former BBC entertainer Rolf Harris was convicted of a string of historic indecent assaults on girls in 2014. Chris Langham, star of BBC comedy The Thick of It, was found guilty of possessing child pornography in 2007. Stuart Hall, star of BBC show It’s a Knockout, was jailed in 2013 after admitting historical indecent assaults of 13 girls, one as young as nine. Savile’s offending, revealed in 2012, was of a different order of magnitude, as was the failure of the BBC (and other organisations) to put an end to his decades-long spree of sex crimes, despite opportunities to do so arising.

 

Edwards’ case is different, but the fact that the BBC finds itself here again raises the inevitable question of why it seems to be so plagued by scandals. One answer, say insiders, lies in the way stars are treated at the corporation. "People like Edwards at the BBC become demigods," says Robin Aitken, former BBC journalist and author of the book Can We Trust The BBC? "They think they’re above the rules."

 

No manager, not even the director-general, is considered bigger than the on-screen talent. This leads to excessive reverence towards the big names, he suggests. Very often, BBC managers are reluctant to take on criticism of their big stars. I think there is a problem there, managing these big stars and their behaviour. If their behaviour is bad in any way, is the BBC sufficiently tough, and does it take sufficient action? I suspect not.

 

Meirion Jones, a former BBC journalist whose Newsnight investigation into Savile was pulled, agrees the BBC treats its celebrities and star presenters "in a way that makes them think they’re almost gods." He says: "We saw that with Savile, we saw it with Russell Brand, we’ve seen it again with Edwards. There’s a feeling they are not constrained by the same rules that affect ordinary people working at the BBC."

 

Jimmy Savile

 

But this culture of invulnerability doesn’t only enable bad behaviour from on-screen talent, he indicates. It also seems to permeate those higher up in the corporation. In the recent past, Jones has been approached by BBC staffers telling him that when complaints are made to senior managers, it’s the complainants who are dealt with. "They end up leaving," he says. "That then means the managers tend to line up with the big names in thinking they’re all-powerful, and ordinary people who work at the BBC are not."

 

A common complaint is quite how many of these senior managers are employed by the broadcaster, according to one former senior BBC news correspondent. "The BBC as an organisation is very top-heavy," he says. "The thing you’ll always hear from people at the coalface is, ‘Why are there so many managers, and what the hell do they do?’" Another BBC insider puts it equally bluntly: "Management is incapable of managing."

 

This view is arguably borne out by the apparently botched handling of crisis after crisis, and what some see as a culture of cover-ups. This, indeed, was the flavour of Lord Dyson’s damning report into the Bashir affair. The review said that several senior figures knew about the duplicity the journalist deployed to land his interview with Diana and still did nothing about it.

 

The circumstances surrounding Edwards’ downfall aren’t entirely clear-cut. While the BBC now admits it had been "made aware in confidence" in November of Edwards’ arrest, it points out that no charges had been brought against him at this time and stresses that it had "been made aware of significant risk to his health."

 

In an interview on Thursday, Tim Davie, director-general of the BBC, defended the decision not to sack Edwards back then, despite knowing that the presenter’s arrest involved the most serious category of indecent images of children. He said the corporation had taken "difficult decisions in a fair and judicious manner." But there have also been accusations by BBC employees that Edwards sent them inappropriate messages. Two complainants have said that they couldn’t report this behaviour to BBC managers. While the BBC says it always treats "the concerns of staff with care" and "would always urge any staff members to speak to us if they have any concerns," these revelations will prove uncomfortable for them.

 

"There isn’t an open whistleblower culture," says Jones. Instead of swiftly addressing concerns and getting to the bottom of them – or what Tim Davie might call "getting a grip" – there’s a sense that a proactive approach is neglected in favour of a process that is at best slow and lumbering, and at worst, wilfully blind to possible wrongdoing. Naturally, other broadcasters are not immune from scandal. In recent years, ITV had its Phillip Schofield moment to contend with; Fox News had its Roger Ailes sexual harassment scandal (which also exposed a culture of cover-ups at the station and was turned into the film Bombshell, starring Nicole Kidman). So-called black swan events can happen anywhere. What’s notable is the frequency with which they seem to happen at the BBC.

 

"What we’ve seen is how these black swans are now white swans," says PR guru Mark Borkowski. "It’s a constant flurry. We look at yet another scandal and shake our heads."

 

Huw Edwards, the former News at Ten anchor, resigned from the corporation in April this year on what he said were "health grounds," three months before pleading guilty in court to making indecent images of children. Jonathan King, the music svengali and a regular BBC face throughout the 1980s and 1990s, was convicted of sexually abusing five teenage boys in 2001. Despite this, BBC director-general Mark Thompson was forced to apologise to him a decade later, in 2011, after he was cut out of a Top of The Pops repeat.

 

Jonathan King. The music svengali, a regular BBC face throughout the 1980s and 1990s, was convicted of sexually abusing five teenage boys in 2001. Despite this, BBC director general Mark Thompson was forced to apologise to him a decade later, in 2011, after he was cut out of a Top of The Pops repeat.

 

img alt

 

Chris Langham, the star of The Thick of It, was found guilty on 15 charges of downloading child sex abuse images and videos in 2007 and jailed for ten months, reduced to six months on appeal. He was arrested two years prior after video files were discovered on a computer, a laptop, and an external hard disk drive at his home.

 

img alt

 

Dave Lee Travis, in 2012, two former BBC employees claimed the former DJ and presenter had sexually assaulted several women during his tenure at the station. Two years later, he was eventually found guilty of indecently assaulting a female researcher working in the mid-1990s and given a three-month suspended sentence.

 

img alt

 

Rolf Harris, Operation Yewtree swooped on the Australian painter in March 2013; a year later, he had been found guilty of all twelve counts of indecent assault levelled at him; six of the charges related to a sexual relationship between Harris and one of his daughter’s friends when she was between the ages of thirteen and fifteen.

 

img alt

 

Jimmy Savile, the Savile sexual abuse scandal rocked the BBC in 2012, sparking "the worst crisis" in the broadcaster’s history and an enormous public backlash which saw trust in the organisation collapse. Hundreds of allegations of sexual abuse and recollections from witnesses surfaced a year after Savile’s death.

 

img alt

 

Stuart Hall, the It’s A Knockout and football presenter, was found guilty of sexually assaulting young girls and was sentenced to fifteen months in prison in 2013. An additional conviction for indecent assault came the following year, by which time his jail time had been extended to thirty months.

 

img alt

 

The risk of so many scandals is, of course, a loss of trust. For the publicly-funded BBC, this is particularly serious. "When you’ve got such a massive organisation, there’s enormous bureaucracy and there are always going to be people doing things management don’t know anything about until it becomes too late," says the former BBC news correspondent. "The question is, what do they do when they do have a whiff of scandal?" Many feel that what they do is not what needs to be done. "The BBC doesn’t tend to handle these things very well. It’s not nimble, it’s not like any sort of private organisation where there’s someone strong in charge who can react," says the former correspondent.

 

So do they ever learn their lessons? Will they now? "The sort of lessons they do learn is to be more receptive to staff mental health and bullying in the workplace," says the former BBC correspondent. "But they haven’t learned how to deal with someone committing sex offences in their private life. It is very tricky. I’m sure there’ll be an inquiry, and they’ll say lessons have been learned. Who knows whether they will be?"

 

Credit: Daily Telegraph  2024-08-03

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

 

Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

 

Posted
34 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

Is it just a coincidence that these 'sort' of people work for the BBC, or is it the BBC attracts these sort of people?

 

From what I've seen of the protests of the past few years, that's just the kind of graduates that journalism (and other liberal arts) universities are pumping out.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

No mention if poor old Frank Bough? Leading sports presenter, then lead anchor on the new Breakfast TV in 80s... His downfall quite tame compared to most at the beeb - caught with couple of prostitutes dressed in a full set of Webbing, doing lines of Charlie with a big black d il do stuck up his orifice... If memory serves me correct...  

Posted
3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

No coincidence. It's a leftist organization. Hence lots of degenerates pretending to be wholesome. 

Give it a rest flexible Jonny. Have a look at the Tory party appointees to top positions at the Beeb.

"a leftist organization (sic)"!

You cannot be serious. Far right Farridge is given more air time by Auntie Beeb than the whole Dimbleby family.

The mere fact that those on the right think it's "leftist" and those of us on the left think it's too partial to the right must prove BBC is impartial.

  • Confused 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Red Forever said:

Give it a rest flexible Jonny. Have a look at the Tory party appointees to top positions at the Beeb.

"a leftist organization (sic)"!

You cannot be serious. Far right Farridge is given more air time by Auntie Beeb than the whole Dimbleby family.

The mere fact that those on the right think it's "leftist" and those of us on the left think it's too partial to the right must prove BBC is impartial.

 

I can see why you'd be such a big supporter of the BBC and it's big names over the years.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Lokie said:

No mention if poor old Frank Bough? Leading sports presenter, then lead anchor on the new Breakfast TV in 80s... His downfall quite tame compared to most at the beeb - caught with couple of prostitutes dressed in a full set of Webbing, doing lines of Charlie with a big black d il do stuck up his orifice... If memory serves me correct...  

Sounds like the average BBC employee, or any lawyer, accountant...  Good old Frank!

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
20 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

No coincidence. It's a leftist organization. Hence lots of degenerates pretending to be wholesome. 

Nonsense. They are all of a particular era where such things were, while not necessarily acceptable, tolerated.

Bill Wyman, David Bowie, Led Zeppelin, Stephen Tyler - the list pedophile celebrities extends far beyond the BBC. And no doubt the list of people you have never heard of who were doing the same is many times greater again. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...